Author: Andr

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Protection and Museuming of Chinese Historical Objects, 200-204

Shuan Li, Peng Chan, Ivashko Julia V.
Kyiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-200-204
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-200-204
UDK: [069:351.853](510)

ABSTRACT

The article raises the problem of museuming objects of European heritage of North (German) National Romanticism in China. The example of the former Governor's residence, and later the China’s Government House of Guest, shows how the historic site has been transformed into a monument of national importance and at the same time a museum object. The specifics of the preservation of historical sites in Qingdao are characterized.

In Art Nouveau in China the international tendencies of European Art Nouveau interlaced with traditional Chinese architecture and gave the birth to the original Art Nouveau in China.

It is necessary to mark that the A.N. from one part of China to another differed so considerable. For example, the A.N. objects in German colony Qingdao differ from such objects at Russian settlement in Harbin, Shenyang and Dalyan. In Qingdao A.N. arose the original appearance in representative buildings – the original Chinese interpretation of North (German) National Romanticism. These objects are similar to the objects of National Romanticism in Northern Europe but they included the combination of European and Chinese traditions.

The most famous architects of German National Romanticism who worked in Qingdao were Lazarowicz Werner (the author of the Gouverneur House, built in 1907) and Curt Rothkegel (the author of the Christian Gospel church, built in 1908-1910). President Mao lived in the Governor's house in 1957, and since 1999 the building has been granted the status of a museum and monument of national importance, while fully preserving the authenticity of architecture and furniture.

Key words: preservation, museum, historical sites, Qingdao, governor's residence.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Shuan, L., Peng, Ch., Ivashko, Y.V. 2019. Protection and Museuming of Chinese Historical Objects (Zberezhennia i muzeiefikatsiia istorychnykh obiektiv v Kytai). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 200-204 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Levoshko S.S. 2000. Russkaya architektura I gradostroitelstwo v Severo-Vostochnoj Azii v XX vieke: vektory vzaimovlijanij. Rossija, Kitai, Japonia v Severo-Vostochnoj Azii: problem regionalnogo vzaimodeistvija v XXI veke. Мaterialy mezdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii 18–19 sentiabria 2000 g. Vladivostok. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://nature.web.ru/db/msg.html?mid=1185858
Levoshko, S.S. 2001. Russkaya architektura v kulturnom pogranichie Dalnego Vostoka. Manchzurija, 1900–1940-e gody. Vtoryje Kryshanovskiye chtenija: materialy mezdynarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Vladivostok: 2001. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://lib.rin.ru/doc/i/73319p.html
Linke, D. 2005. Tsingtau — Deutsche Stadt am Gelben Meer 1897–1914. Ein Kapitel deutscher Kolonialgeschichte in China. Kolme K Verlag: Auflage.
Sadowski, L. 2008. Architektura europejska w Chinach od połowy XIX wieku do 1937 roku. Sztuka Dalekiego Wschodu. Studia, Warszawa. S.145–154.
Sadowski, L. 2009. Architektura koncesji zachodnich w Szanghaju w latach 1860–1914. Sztuka Chin, Warszawa. S. 43–51.
Sadowski L. 2010. Architektura miast Kolei Południowo-Mandżurskiej w latach 1898–1945. Łódź (tekst w internecie).
Sadowski, L. 2011. The Japanes “overseas” architecture in North-East China 1905–1945. Art of Japan, Japanism and Polish-Japanese Art Relations, Kraków. S. 277–284.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Makau — ośrodek jezuickiej aktywności na Dalekim Wschodzie w latach 1565–1762. Architektura znaczeń, Warszawa. S. 102–113.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Zbiory Muzeum Wojskowego w Pekinie. Non Sensistis Gladios, Łódź. S. 335–348.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Harbin. The Center of Civilisation at the Northern Part of Manchzurija. Poland-China: Art and Cultural Heritage, Kraków. S. 171–183.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Zachodnie dzielnice w miastach Dalekiego Wschodu. Lublin, 2011.
Sadowski, L. 2013. Harbin. The Center of Civilisation at the Northern Part of Manczurija. Poland-China: Art and Cultural Heritage, Beijing (po chińsku). S. 156–164.
Sadowski, L. 2014. Polish Architects in China in the beginning of 20th Century. The Second International Conference of Polish and Chinese Art. China-Poland, Art and Cultural Heritage, Tainan. S. 131–142.
Warner, T. 1994. Deutsche Architektur in China. Architekturtransfer. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Quingdao. Quingdao: Quingdao Publishing House.
Yuan, Binjiu 2009. German architecture in Qingdao. Quingdao: China Architecture and Building Press.
Sun, Wei, Qing, Jun 2011. Qingdao German Governor’s House Museum (Qingdao Guest House). Quingdao: China book press.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Modern Methodological and Scientific Concepts of Exhibition Planning on the Example of the Museums of a Historical Profile in China, 190-199

Markina Lisa A.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-190-199
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-190-199
UDK: 069.5(510)

ABSTRACT

The modern methodological and scientific concepts of exposition planning in the museums of а historical profile on the territory of China are a certain nationalist influence on the Society of China, which is built on the multicultural concept, which formulates globalizing, sociocultural, socio-pedagogical, and most importantly historical vision in the museum audience.

The modern methodological and scientific concepts an exhibition in the museums of а historical profile in China are a certain nationalist influence on Chinese society, built on a multicultural concept that formulates globalization, sociocultural, socio-pedagogical, and most importantly, historical audiences.

The notion of «museum exhibition», in Chinese, is called «博物馆的陈列品» («Bówùguǎn de chénliè pǐn») and has the meaning of a scientific combination of cultural relics, examples and auxiliary exhibits that reflect the processes of development and the laws of society, natural history, science and the technique or value of a particular subject, and the combination of science, art, and technology that can be observed by people.

The relevance of the article is the vision of historians, museum historians, and designers of modern tendencies, aimed at showing methodological and scientific basis, about planning of exposition on the example of а historical profile museums on the territory of China.

In the history of the Modern Chinese Museum of China, this problem is presented by scientific research – Zhou Shiki, Wang Yun, Zhang Len, Chen Duanyzhi, Lucy Pei, Gow Hujfen and others.

The aim is to highlight modern methodological and scientific concepts of exposition planning on the example of historical museums and to study innovative and innovative tendentions in the museums of historical profile in China.

Thus, the article presents an analysis of the study of modern methodological concepts of exposures planning in museums of а historical profile. Analyzing the development of research of methodological and scientific concepts, we show the relevance of these problems, among Chinese musealists, historians and designers. We can say that among the museums of а historical profile, there is a trend of nationalist, multicultural, socio-cultural, socio-pedagogical and historical vision. In addition, we can say that the data of methodological and scientific concepts combine the principle: «sence and forms»of the exposition and «vision of space» in the museum.

Key words: methodology, concepts, exposition, the museums of historical profile, China.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Markina, L.A. 2019. The Modern Methodological and Scientific Concepts of Exhibition Planning on the Example of the Museums of a Historical Profile in China (Suchasni metodolohichno-naukovi kontseptsii planuvannia ekspozytsii na prykladi muzeiv istorychnoho profiliu v Kytai). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 190-199 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Fùzhènlún. 1957. Bówùguǎn xué gàilùn. Běijîng: Shângwù yìn shűguǎn.
Wénhuà bù wénwù shìyè guǎnlǐ jú zhǔbiân. 1985. Zhôngguó bówùguǎn xué gàilùn. Běijîng: Wénwù chűbǎn shè.
Zhôushìqí. 2018. Kuà shíkông de lìshǐ wénhuà zàixiàn: Zhôngguó bówùguǎn chénliè yìshù 60 nián.
Lǐxuéqín, lǚwényù. 2006.20 Shìjì zhôngguó xuéshù dàdiǎn: Kǎogǔ xué, bówùguǎn xué.
Wánměi lùnwén wǎng. 2017. Bówùguǎn zhǎnpǐn chénliè zhǎnlǎn de shèjì qiǎn xî.
Wáng yún, dânwèi. 2016. Shânxî dàxué: Bówùguǎn chénliè zhǎnlǎn shèjì yìshù fçnxî.
Bówùguǎn chénliè zhǎnshì guì nèi shèjì yánjiű. 2015. Today China Forum (05): Nánjîng yìshù xuéyuàn xuébào (měishù yǔ shèjì).
Dài xiě shuòshì lùnwén. 2017. Bówùguǎn zhǎn chén shèjì de xíngshì yǔ kôngjiân bùjú yánjiű.
Haixin Jin, Shizhong Wu, Yijun Chen. 2015. Dângdài bówùguǎn chénliè shèjì de xùshì xìng yìshù tèzhçng.
Pân lì, shîguânghǎi. 2017. Zhìhuì wénbó: Gâoxiào bówùguǎnlǐlùn yǔ shíjiàn.
Mèngqìngjîn. 2011. Dàlián lǐgông dàxué: Xiàndài bówùguǎn gôngnéng yǎnbiàn yánjiű.
Bówùguǎn guǎn lǐ bànfǎ. 2015.
Laura Pozzi (University of Warsaw). Its Museum(s): Making the Shanghai History Museum / Shanghai Revolution Museum.
Hóng bó wǎng. 2019. Guânjiàn: Rúhé zài “yán” shàng zuò wénzhâng? Bówùguǎn yán xué rè xià de lěng sîkǎo.
Huìzhǎn huódòng cèhuà gôngsî dàxíng zhǎn shì shèjì chéngxù. 2018.
Wèilìshî. 2019. Chénliè bówùguǎn lùnwén. Shànghǎi zìrán bówùguǎn chénliè yìshù de yìngyòng.
Qúzhôu wǎnbào. 2019. Bówùguǎn chénliè shî: Ràng wénwù “dòng” qǐlái.
MuseumWeek. 2018. Bówùguǎn yǔ chéngshì: «Zhuânfǎng shànghǎi shì lìshǐ bówùguǎn guǎnzhǎng hú jiâng».

External reviews:  DOWNLOAD

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                       ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Living Museums of Prehistoric times in Ukraine (statement of a question), 185-189

Chymyrys Marharyta V.¹, Olenych Andrii M.^2 
1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
² Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-185-189
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-185-189
УДК: 069.5(477)”632/634”

ABSTRAT

The task of any science is to disseminate scientific knowledge in society. Archeology aims to cover various aspects of the material culture of the past in various ways. In this direction, it interacts closely with museum and educational institutions (museums, schools, festivals), interacting with other applied sciences. The task of which is to maximize the spread of scientific knowledge in society. Here are very relevant forms of filing: various institutions (open-air museums, highly specialized museums), complexes (museum complexes), and exhibitions (temporary). The museum is a traditional and effective platform for these tasks.

However, in recent centuries, the requirements for the museum have changed significantly. Traditionally, it was considered as a place of storage, provided for the availability of funds, storage facilities, restoration offices, etc. Exposure work is only an important component here. The challenges facing contemporary museums give rise to their other forms, the so-called living museums. The first living museum (Skansen Museum) was created in Sweden in the late 19th century. In fact, this museum, which was focused on the presentation of samples of folk architecture and gave impetus to the emergence of such institutions.

In Ukraine, the term “museum-scansen”, “living museum”, “open-air museum” is widely used to refer to such museums. However, these concepts functionally denote the same variety of museums, or in general the widest possible range of museum museums. It should be noted that such museums can still be distributed on a number of grounds.

One such feature is the distribution of museums over the periods they present, and this raises the big question: “Are there any museums that are aimed only at Stone Age and is it even possible and rational?”

Key words: open-air museum, Living museum, scansen, Stone Age.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Olenych, A.M, Chymyrys, M.V. 2019. Living Museums of Prehistoric times in Ukraine (statement of a question) (Zhyvi muzei pervisnoi doby v Ukraini (postanovka pytannia)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 180-184 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Abramova, Z.A. 1971. Liasko — pamiatnik paleoliticheskogo naskal'nogo iskusstva. V: Vasilevskyi, R.S. (red.). Pervobytnoe iskusstvo. Novosibirsk, s. 53-80.
Bashkatov, Yu.Yu., Terpylovskyi, R.V. 2011. Do istorii skanseniv u Yevropi. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 5, s. 7-16.
Borysenko, Yu.S. 2017. Stanovlennia ta rozvytok muzeinykh zakladiv prosto neba na ukrainskykh zemliakh (kinets XIX – 80-ti rr. XX st.). Pytannia kulturolohii, 33, s. 119-130.
Kozii, H. 2009. Pershomu v Ukraini Muzeiu prosto neba – 45. Kraieznavstvo, 1-2, s. 128-134.
Petrauskas, A.V., Petrauskene, A.O., Koval, O.A. 2013. Stvorennia muzeiu-skansenu «Drevlianskyi Hrad». Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 10, s. 124-132.
Pronenko, I.V. 2017. Suchasnyi rozvytok muzeiv-skanseniv v ukrainskii muzeinii strukturi. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi ta vsesvitnoi istorii, 20, s. 91-97.
Remeshylo-Rybchynska, O.I. 2017. Arkhitekturno-prostorova orhanizatsiia arkheolohichnykh muzeiv pid vidkrytym nebom (na prykladi Plisneskoho istoryko-kulturnoho zapovidnyka). Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika» (Seriia: Arkhitektura) 878. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, s. 30-39.
Samoilenko, L.H., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2016. Mezhyrich settlement: What will be future of our past? (Mezhyritska stoianka: yake maibutnie v nashoho mynuloho?). Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Istoriia. 4 (131), s. 62-69. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223
Tikhonov, V.V. 2013. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po formirovaniyu i razvytiyu etnograficheskikh muzeev. Irkutsk.
Fedorova, L.D. 2010. Natsionalnyi Muzei Narodnoi Arkhitektury Ta Pobutu Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy, 7, 728 s.: il. [online]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Natsionalnyj_m_arkh
Shmelev, V.G. 1983. Muzej pod otkry`ty`m nebom: Ocherki istorii vozniknoveniya i razvitiya. Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka.

Pirogovo. Muzej pod otkry`ty`m nebom. 2019. Istoriya sozdaniya muzeya Pirogovo [online]. Rezhim dostupu: http://pirogovo.org.ua/history.html
EXARC.net. 2019. EXARC Members Archaeological (Open-Air) Museums [online]. Режим доступу: https://exarc.net/members/venues

External reviews: ЗАВАНТАЖИТИ

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Innovative Methods in Museum Pedagogics (оn the example of the orphanage “Perlynka”), 180-184

Ivanova Svetlana V.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-180-184
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-180-184
УДК: 069:37.048.2

ABSTRACT

The article deals with the problems of innovative methods in museum pedagogics and it’s role in the identity formation of the child. It is especially important for orphans whose negative experience destroys the idea of ideological and moral values. A museum complex “The Flow of the Time” functions in the orphanage, containing also exhibits that have information about the spiritual culture of the Ukrainian nation, its ancient and modern history. The openness and accessibility of the museum creates special conditions for the cultural development of children-orphans. Involvement in the museum pedagogy of individually oriented methods aimed at enhancing the intellectual and creative abilities of the individual, allows to broaden the horizons of pupils, raise their cultural level, and promote their socialization. The introduction of innovative technologies makes it possible to turn a museum in an orphanage into a development center for an orphaned child.

One of the main tasks of our museum work is the development of children creative competences. All museum’s work is aimed at involving children in the creative process, when the desire to create and the desire to learn and recognize the new are mutually interconnected. The museum’s social partnership allows to expand the range of museum work. Participation in archeological expeditions and searching with the Military Club promotes the involvement of children in active research work. Under the direction of the Republican Small Academy of Sciences, a virtual museum was created and placed on the site of the orphanage “Perlynka”. In addition, the museum was included to the all-Ukrainian project “Museum Planet”. Communication with students of the Odessa National University I.I. Mechnikova and the participation in various joint events is important for the social development of the orphan child.

Key words: museum pedagogy, competence approach, creative groups.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Ivanova, S.V. 2019. Innovative Methods in Museum Pedagogics (оn the example of the orphanage “Perlynka”) (Innovatsiini metodyky v muzeinii pedahohitsi (na prykladi dytiachoho budynku «Perlynka»)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 180-184 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Ivanova, S.V. 2016. Kompetentnostnyj podhod v muzejnoj pedagogike. Visnyk Odeskogo istoriko-krayeznavchogo muzeju, 15, s. 64-67. (in Russian)
Ovcharuk, O.V. (ed.). 2004. Kompetentnisnyj pidhid u suchasnij osviti: svitovij dosvid ta ukrayinski perspektyvi. Kiyiv.: K.I.S. (in Ukrainian)
Rudenko, S.B. 2012. Pro mozhlivosti sociokulturnogo vykoristannya muzejnyh pam’yatok u suchasnyh umovah. Visnik Derzhavnoyi akademiyi kerivyih kadriv kultury i mystetstv, 3, s. 79-83. (in Ukrainian)
Savchenko, O.Ya. 2004. Uminnya vchitisya yak klyuchova kompetentnist zagalnoyi serednoyi osvity. In: Ovcharuk, O.V. (ed.). Kompetentnisnyj pidhid u suchasnij osviti: svitovij dosvid ta ukrayinski perspektyvi. Kiyiv.: K.I.S, s. 34 – 52. (in Ukrainian).

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Challenges for the Modern Museum: how to understand and prepare, 174-179

Lowak Victoria B.
trainer for Museum Marketing and Communication

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-174-179
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-174-179
УДК: 069:378

ABSTRACT

The main components that determine the development of a modern museum are communication, interaction and participation. Each of them is heterogeneous, complex and multidimensional.

Communication includes a wide range of components, beginning with various forms of information transfer, communication between the exponent and the audience, interaction through various media forms and ending with marketing communication and branding. Interaction involves not only the involvement of analogue and electronic media in the exposition of the museum, but also the use of related media (website, blog, apps) as separate forms interaction. In other words, the modern museum functions both in the classical off-line mode as well as on-line. Participation is not only about various ways of active involvement of visitors at all phases of preparation and “consumption” of a museum’s “product”, but also about exhibition design, visitor research and evaluation of exhibitions.

To be capable to implement its own individual goals in today’s challenging and quickly changing environment and in accordance with global trends (communication, interactivity and partisanship), a museum needs qualified staff. Today museum’s stuff is required not only to possess fundamental knowledge about the work with the collection - collection, preservation, research, interpretation and exhibition, but also needs to have a number of new competences, including communication, marketing and project management skills. Therefore, the effective education of modern museum specialists requires thorough theoretical training as well as broad interdisciplinary orientation and integration into the actual museum practice..

Key words: communication, interactivity, participation, museum management, museum marketing.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Lowak, V.B. 2019. Challenges for the Modern Museum: how to understand and prepare (Vyklyky dlia suchasnoho muzeiu: zrozumity ta pidhotuvatysia). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 174-179 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Ahapova, D. 2016. Muzeina komunikatsiia v dusi kultury uchasti. V: Hrubrina, Yu., Morozova, L., Pylypchuk, T. ta in. (up.). Kult chy kultura: uchasnytski praktyky v muzeiakh. K: Vydavets Cherednychenko A.M., s. 66-98. (in Ukrainian)
Borysova, T. 2015. Marketynh nekomertsiinykh orhanizatsii u rozrizi sfer diialnosti: teoriia i praktyka. Ternopil: Aston. (in Ukrainian)
Kotler, N., Kotler, F., Kotler, V. 2010. Muzeinyi marketynh i stratehiia: formuvannia misii, zaluchennia publiky, zbilshennia dokhodiv i resursiv. K: VD «Stylos». (in Ukrainian)
Fer, M. 2016. Partysypatsiia yak zasib vid muzeinoi dementsii. V: Hrubrina, Yu., Morozova, L., Pylypchuk, T. ta in. (up.). Kult chy kultura: uchasnytski praktyky v muzeiakh. K: Vydavets Cherednychenko A.M., s. 18-41. (in Ukrainian)
Chernobai, Yu. M., Bryndza, V. O. 2014. Proekt stratehii zbalansovanoho rozvytku muzeiu. 2014. Naukovi zapysky Derzhavnoho pryrodoznavchoho muzeiu, 30, s. 3-22. (in Ukrainian)
Iureneva T. 2007. Muzeevedenie: Uchebnik dlia vysshei shkoly. M: Akademicheskii Proekt. (in Russian).
Dauschek, A. 2016. Museumsmanagemant als Aufgabe zwischen Ökonomie und kultereller Praxis – ein Rückblick. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 43-51.
Döring, J. 2016. Digitale Exponate – ein neues Medium. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 85-93.
Geyer, H. 2008. Kulturbezug des Kulturmarketing. In: Geyer, H., Manschwetus, U. 2008. Kulturmarketing. München, Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag, S. 3-12.
Föhl, P., Glogner-Pilz, P. 2017. Kulturmanagement als Wissenschaft: Grundlagen – Entwicklungen – Perspektiven. Einführung für Studium und Praxis. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Lockstone, L. 2011. Major case study: Shape shifters – the role and function of modern museum. In: Museum Marketing: Competing in the Global Marketplace. New York: Routledge, p. 61-68.
New Territory for Art: From the iPhone to the Brooklyn Museum [online]. https://www.aandbscotland.org.uk/uploads/research/New_Territory_for_Art_-_iphone_to_Brooklyn_Museum.pdf
. Edinburgh: Arts & Business Scotland. [Application date October 16, 2019].
Rainer, W., Kirmeier, J. 2016. Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation als Koordinaten der Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 7-16.
Rentschler, R. 2011. Museum Marketing: no longer a dirty word. In: Rentschler, R., Hede, A. 2011. Museum Marketing: Competing in the Global Marketplace. New York: Routledge, p. 12-20.

External reviews: ЗАВАНТАЖИТИ

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Attic Black-glazed Pottery from the Collection of Exposition of the Archaeological Museum of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, 166-172

Chechulina Iryna O.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-166-172
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-166-172
UDK:[904.23:069.5]”652”

ABSTRACT

Finds of Attic tableware and ceremonial ware in the North Black Sea region are mass, and that is why they are so important since they provide information for detailed chronology of ancient material. The collection of finds from Olbia, which is exhibited in the Archaeological Museum of IA NASU, is quite numerous. The investigated part of the material includes Attic black-glazed pottery, which was found in Olbia in different years at different sites of excavations, from 1962 to 2000. Some finds, unfortunately, have only museum archive numbers, so we are not able to trace their origin. All the ceramic material is well preserved, all necessary parts are properly restored, and they are exhibited in the main hall dedicated to archeology of the Iron Age of Ukraine.

The vast majority of the studied collection consists of vessels for drinking wine – eleven vessels of the sixteen studied, dating from the Athenian Agora from 500 to 325 BC.

Pottery for wine are represented by cups and kantharos in various types. These are the cup – «bolsal» 420 BC – two examples; cup-kantharos 340–325 BC – two examples; two Hellenistic kantharos with an applique ornament IV BC and one kantharos – micro form; cup-skyphos 410 BC; stemmed dish 500 BC; cup “delicate class” 430 BC and a stemmed cup of the middle of the 5th BC.

Open types of pottery include a bowl with an outturned rim 420 BC and fish plate 350–325 BC.

Rare finds of the pottery of the closed forms are oynohoya with relief ornament of the V century BC and a Hellenistic pelika with an applique ornament.

All the above forms have direct analogies in the material from the Athenian Agora and finds of Attic black-glazed ware from other cities in the Northern Black Sea. These forms belong to the ceremonial tableware demonstrate an active trade relations of the Olbio Polis with the Attic region during the classical time.

Key words: Attic black lacquer ceramics, Olbia, museum collection, Northern Black Sea coast, antiquity, classical period, Hellenistic period.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Chechulina, I.O. 2019. Attic Black-glazed Pottery from the Collection of Exposition of the Archaeological Museum of IA NAS of Ukraine (Poperednii analiz attychnoi chornolakovoi keramiky z ekspozytsii Arkheolohichnoho muzeiu IA NAN Ukrainy). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 166-172 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Buiskykh, A.V. 2015. Yuzhnyi temenos Olvyy Pontyiskoi. Vestnyk drevnei istoryy, 2, s. 6-21. (in Russian)
Kozub, Yu.I. 1979. Peredmistia Olvii. Arkheolohiia, 29, s. 3-34. (in Russian)
Levy, E.Y. 1940. Pryvoznaia hrecheskaia keramyka iz raskopok Olvyy v 1935, 1936 hh. Olvyia, 1, s. 105-126. (in Russian)
Nazarchuk, V.Y. 2014. Chernolakovaia keramyka. V: Krizhytskyi, S.D., Leipunskaia, N.A. y dr. Zhylie doma Tsentralnoho kvartala Olvii. MAIET, 13, s. 312-356. (in Russian)
Papanova, V.A. 2000. Chernolakovaia keramyka iz semeino-rodovoho uchastka nekropolia Olvii. Starozhytnosti Stepovoho Prychornomoria i Krymu, 8, s. 194-216. (in Russian)
Papanova, V.A. 1993. Nekropol Olvii. Istoryia issledovanyia, itohy raskopok. Berdiansk: Hortypohrafyia. (in Russian)
Parovych-Peshykan, M. 1974. Nekropol Olvii ellinisticheskoho vremeni. Kiev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Rusiaeva, A.S., Nazarchuk, V.Y. 2006. Atticheskaia keramika. MAIET, 2, s. 169-177. (in Russian)
Farmakovskyi, B.V. 1911. Pamiatnyky antychnoi kulturi, naidennie v Rossyy. IAK, IV (42), s. 134-143. (in Russian)
Chechulina, I.O. 2016. Shtampovanyi ornament na attychnii chornolakovii keramitsi z Olvii. Arkheolohiia (2), s. 29-38. (in Ukrainian).
Alexandrescu, P. 1966. La necropole tumulaire (Fouilles 1955-1961). Histria, II.
Alexandrescu, P. 1978. Le ceramique d’epoqye archaique et classique (VII–IV s). Histria, IV.
Bozkova, A. 1997. A Pontic Pottery Group Hellenistic Age. Archaeologia Bulgarica, 2, p. 8-17.
Handberg, S., Peterson, J.H. 2010. Black-glossed pottery. Black Sea Studies 13, p. 187-196.
Rotroff, S.I. 1991. Attic West Slope Vase Painting. Hesperia, Vol. 60, No. l.
Rotroff, S.I. 1997. Hellenistic Pottery. Athenian and Imported Wheelmade Table Ware and Related Material. The Athenian Agora, XXIX.
Sparkes, B.A., Talcott, L. 1970. Black and Plain Pottery of the 6th, 5th and 4th Centuries B.C. The Athenian Agora XII.
Thompson, H.A., Thompson, D.B., Rotroff, S.I. 1987. Hellenistic pottery and terracottas. Princeton, N.J: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Finds of Young Archaeologist Mug, 159-165

Peresunchak O.S.
History teacher of communal institution "Zavalliysky Lyceum" of Gayvoron district council of Kirovograd region

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-159-165
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-159-165
UDK: [902.2:371.385.4](477.65)

ABSTRACT

The publication is dedicated to the coverage of the activity of the Junior Archeologist Student Circle, which operates on the basis of the communal institution “Zavalliysky Lyceum of the Gayvoron District Council of the Kirovograd region, and which will celebrate the 20th anniversary next year. This children’s association was created with the purpose of interest of young people in the ancient history of the region, education of the younger generation of respect for the monuments of history and cultures, deepening knowledge of the history of Ukraine. It was possible to combine the work of the students with the study in the archeology section of the Kirovograd Small Academy of Sciences of the student youth, which in turn made it possible to achieve some practical and theoretical successes. As a result of a systematic survey of the territory of Middle Pobuzhye, new archeological monuments were discovered, numerous archaeological material were collected and were threatened with destruction as a result of man-made activities. In general, in the territory of the region the circles surveyed settlements, mounds and other objects of different time intervals, starting from the Neolithic period of the Cossack period. Circumstances were constantly reported to the relevant scientific institutions by the founders, and the found artifacts were transmitted for further work by archaeological scientists.Еffective cooperation was established between scientists and young researchers of Pobuzhye. Soon, such cooperation extended beyond the borders of Ukraine. This article is perhaps the first attempt to share experience in the educational process of exploring the archeology students of the Middle Pobuzhye and to introduce into art circulation artifacts that were partially disclosed, as well as those that were not previously known to a wide range of scientists. We hope that this will help attract the attention of scientists to our region, as well as help protect and preserve the cultural heritage of the past.

Key words: Middle Pobuzhya, culture of line-ribbon ceramics, Trypillian culture, anthropomorphic plastic, Bronze Age, Chernyakhiv culture.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Peresunchak, O.S. 2019. Finds of Young Archaeologist Mug (Znakhidky hurtka «Iunyi arkheoloh»). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 159-165 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Videiko, M.Yu. 1987. Otchet ob arkheolohycheskoy razvedke v Hayvoronskom rayone Kyrovohradskoy oblasty v 1987 hodu. NA YA NANU, 1987/37a.
Hopkalo, O.V. 2007. Pro deyaki rezulʹtaty ta perspektyvy doslidzhennya chernyakhivsʹkoho kostyuma. Arkheolohiya. 2007. №2. S. 48-56.
Kyosak, D., Bruyako, Y., Denysyuk, V. 2014. Kompleks arkheolohycheskykh pamyatnykov «Kamennoe-Zavalʹe» v Srednem Pobuzhʹe. Raboty 2011-2012 hh. Tyragetia, s.n. vol. VIII [XXIII], nr.1.
Kiosak, D.V. 2016. «Stepovyy vplyv» na pam’yatky typu Sabatynivka I (za materialamy poselennya Shamrayi). Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Kiosak, D.V. 2018. Hnyla Skelya – nove poselennya kul’tury liniyno-strichkovoyi keramiky. Arkheolohiya, etnolohiya ta okhorona kul’turnoyi spadshchyny Pivdenno-Skhidnoyi Yevropy: zbirka naukovykh robit prysvyachena 25-richchyu kafedry arkheolohiyi ta etnolohiyi Odes’koho national’noho universytetu im. I.I. Mechnikova. Odesa: ONU.
Kiosak, D., Lytvynchuk, YU., Peresunchak, O. 2013. Kam’yane Zavallya 1 – trypil’s’ke poselennya etapu BI na pivnochi Odeshchyny. Drevnee Prychernomor’e. Vypusk X. Odessa: FLP «A.S. Frydman».
Mahomedov, B.V. 1987. Chernyakhovskaya kul’tura Severo-Zapadnoho Prychernomor’ya. K.: Naukova dumka.
Orlyk, O.P., Sokolyuk, I.A., Zasyadʹvovk, R.P. 2009. Akty visual’noho obstezhennya terytoriyi Hayvorons’koho rayonu Kirovohrads’koyi oblasti. Kirovohrad.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2012. Novi trypil’s’ki poselennya na Pivdennomu Buzi. Zemledel’tsy i skotovody drevney Evropy. Kyev, Sankt-Peterburh.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2012. Pam’yatky arkheolohiyi Hayvoronshchyny. Materialy IV oblasnykh krayeznavchykh Kutsenkivs’kykh chytan’. Kirovohrad: Lysenko V.F.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2015. Poselennya trypil’s’koyi kul’tury Topoli. MASP. Vyp. ХІІІ. Odessa.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2016. Chernyakhivs’ke poselennya Bila Skelya (Kam’yane-Zavallya) na Seredn’omu Pobuzhzhi. Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2018. Artefakty ta mistseznakhodzhennya doby bronzy na terytoriyi Seredn’oho Pobuzhzhya. Arkheolohiya, etnolohiya ta okhorona kul’turnoyi spadshchyny Pivdenno-Skhidnoyi Yevropy: zbirka naukovykh robit prysvyachena 25-richchyu kafedry arkheolohiyi ta etnolohiyi Odes’koho national’noho universytetu im. I.I. Mechnikova. Odesa: ONU.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2018. Novi pam’yatky arkheolohiyi v baseyni r. Mohylyanka. Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Peresunchak, O.S., Burdo, N.B. 2015. Kolektsiya plastyky iz ran’otrypil’s’koho poselennya Mohyl’na III. Kul’turnyy kompleks Kukuten’-Trypillya ta yoho susidy. Zbirka naukovykh prats’ pam’yati V. Krutsa. Lviv: Astrolyabiya.
Peresunchak, O.S., Tupchiyenko, M.P. 2018. Monety ryms’koho chasu z muzeynoho zibrannya Zavallivs’koho navchal’no-vykhovnoho ob’yednannya «Zahal’noosvitnya shkola I – III stupeniv» Hayvorons’koho rayonu yak vidobrazhennya osoblyvostey hroshovykh vidnosyn imperiyi z varvars’kym svitom. Materialy mizhnarodnoyi konferentsiyi «Aktual’ni problemy numizmatyky u systemi spetsial’nykh haluzey istorychnoyi nauky». Pereyaslav-Medzhybizh.
Rudʹ, V., Peresunchak, O., Sobchuk, V. 2018. Zvit pro robotu Skhidno-Podil’s’koyi arkheolohichnoyi ekspedytsiyi na terytoriyi Kirovohrads’koyi oblasti u 2017 r.: obstezhennya pam’yatok arkheolohiyi Kazavchyns’koyi sils’koyi rady Hayvorons’koho rayonu. Kyyiv, Kropyvnyts’kyy.
Tsvek, O.V. 2006. Poselennya skhidnotrypil’s’koyi kul’tury (korotkyy narys). K.: Instytut arkheolohiyi NANU.
Tsybeskov, V.P. 1971. Nekotorye ytohy yssledovanyya Berezovskoho poselenyya. MASP. Vyp. 7. Odessa.
Petrequin, P., Errera, M., Voinea, V., Tsonev, T., Turkanu, S., Serbanescu, D., Kiosak, D., Peresunchak, O., Polischuk, L. et Chernakov, D. 2017. Des Alpes a la mer Noire (Bulgarie, Romanie et Ukraine). Jade objets-signes et interpretations sociales des jades alpins dans l’Europe neolithique. Presses universitares de France-Comte Centre de Recherche Archiologique de la Vallee de Ain.
Thomas, S., Posselt, М., Dębiec, М., Kiosak, D.,Tkachuk, T. 2016. Prospections magnetometriqeues sur des sites de la culture Cucuteni – Trypillia sur le cours du Dnistre et tu Boug de sud neamt county museum complex Cucuteni eneolithic art museum of Piatra-Neamt cucuteni culture international research centre cucuteni culture within the european neo-eneolithic contex. Proceedings of the International Colloquium „Cucuteni – 130” 15-17 October 2014. Piatra-Neamts..

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
New Explorations of the Trypillia Settlements of Bugh-Dnieper Interfluve: a collection of flint finds, 144-158

Hofmann R.¹, Shatilo L.O.¹, Pichkur Ye.V.^2
1 Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (Germany)
² Archaeological Museum of Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-144-158
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-144-158
УДК:[903.4:552.553](477.46+477.65)”636”

ABSTRACT

As a result of the exploration survey carried out at three different-time Trypillian sites in the interfluve of the Bugh and Dnieper rivers (Chyzhivka, Veselyi Kut and Volodymyrivka), an informative collection of flint artifacts was collected.

The most indicative, both quantitatively and qualitatively, is the lithic collection from the settlement of Volodymyrivka. In total, it contains 121 products and is divided into two categories: production wastes and tools. Cores, flakes, blades and other products represent production wastes (56 items). Among the tools (65 lithics), there are retouched blades and flakes, end scrapers, notched, perforators, chisels, sickle insets, arrowheads and other products with secondary processing. Most of the artifacts found in Volodymyrivka made of local raw material, which is found in sufficient quantities along the banks of the Syniukha River, not far from the settlement, although the collection also contains items made of Volynia-like flint. By the nature of the finds, a full cycle of flint processing took place at the settlement: extraction — primary — secondary treatment of flint. This is evidenced by the presence of outcrops of raw material near the settlement and products made of it, which were found directly at the settlement; the presence in the collection of both production wastes and tools related directly to the process of flint knapping – stone hammers; presence of retouched products and cases of their reutilization or repair. The typology and statistics of products almost completely coincides with the data published earlier on the results of excavations. We have also identified tools that were not previously found on the site – chisels.

The closest analogy to the Volodymyrivka lithic assemblage is the collection of the synchronous Andriivka settlement. Comparison of the two assemblages, taking into account the previously published data, made it possible to take a fresh look at the flint industry of the Volodymyrivka local-chronological group and highlight some of its features.

Key words: Trypillia culture, Chalcolithic, settlements, flint artifacts, Eastern Trypillia, Western Trypillia, archaeo-magnetic survey.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Hofmann R., Shatilo L.O., Pichkur Ye.V. 2019. New Explorations of the Trypillia Settlements of Bugh-Dnieper Interfluve: a collection of flint finds (Novi rozvidky na trypil’s’kykh poselenniakh Buho-Dnistrovs’koho mezhyrichchia: kolektsiia kremianykh znakhidok). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 144-158 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Kruts, V.A., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A.G., Rassman, K., Peters, D. 2011. Tal'yanki: perezagruzka. Geomagnitnaya s`yemka tri desyatiletiya spustya posle rabot. V: Kruts, V.A., Korvin-Piotrovskiy A.G., Ryzhov, S.N., Chernovol, D.K., Chabanyuk, V.V. Poseleniye – gigant Tal'yanki. Issledovaniya 2011 / Talianki – settlement-giant of the Tripolian culture. Investigations in 2011 (Kiev 2011), s. 60–85.
Movsha, T.G. 1984. Khronologiya Tripol'ya-Kukuteni i stepnyye kul'tury epokhi rannego metalla v yeye sisteme. Problemy arkheologii Podneprov'ya: Sb.n.s. Dnepropetrovsk, c. 60–83.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Rassmann, K., Mishka, K., Videiko, M.Yu., Burdo, N.B. 2014. Maydanetskoye: issledovaniya po obnovlennomu planu poseleniya. Stratum Plus, 2, c. 285–302.
Passek, T.S. 1940. Tripol'skoye poseleniye u Vladimirovki. VDI, № 1. s. 212-220
Passek, T.S. 1947. Tripol'skoye poseleniye u Vladimirovki v svete novykh issledovaniy. KSIIMK, Vyp. 21. s. 65-74.
Passek, T.S. 1949. Periodizatsiya tripol'skikh poseleniy. MIA, № 10, 248 s.
Petrun’, V.F. 2004. Vykorystannia mineralnoi syrovyny naselenniam trypilskoi kultury. V: Videiko, M.Yu. (Ed.). Entsyklopediia trypilskoi tsyvilizatsii, T. 1. Kyiv, s. 199-218.
Pichkur, E.V. 2017. Indicators of «Imports» in Trypillian Culture (on materials of «hoards» of flint blades) (Indikatory «importov» v tripolskoy kulture (po materialam «kladov» kremnevykh plastin)). VITA ANTIQUA, 9, HUMAN & LANDSCAPE: Prehistoric Archaeology of Eastern Europe. p. 206-222. https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2017-9-206-221
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2019. Skladovi kremenevoyi industriyi kukutenʹ-trypilʹsʹkoyi spilʹnoty: vydobutok ta poshyrennya kremenyu. Arkheolohiya i davnya istoriya Ukrayiny, 3 (32), s. 37—49. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2019.03.03
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2019a. Comparative analysis of lithic assemblages of Trypillian culture settlements Volodymyrivka and Andriyivka. In: Terpylovskyy R.V., Shydlovskyi P.S. (Eds.). International Scientific Conference «ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEOLOGY IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH» on 75-th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology (October 24 - 25, 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine): Abstracts. K.: Center for Prehistoric Research, p. 37-38.
Ryzhov, S.M. 2007. Suchasnyy stan vyvchennya kulʹturno-istorychnoyi spilʹnosti kukutenʹ-trypillya na terytoriyi Ukrayiny. V: O. Olʹzhych. Arkheolohiya. K., c. 437–477.
Ryzhov, S.N. 2015. Vladimirovskaya lokal'no-khronologicheskaya gruppa zapadnotripol'skoy kul'tury v Bugo-Dneprovskom mezhdurech'ye. Kulʹturnyy kompleks Kukutenʹ-Trypillya ta yoho susidy : Zbirka naukovykh pratsʹ pamyati Volodymyra Krutsa za redaktsiyeyu Oleksandra Dyachenka, Franchesko Menotti, Serhiya Ryzhova, Kateryny Bunyatyan i Slavomira Kadrova. Lʹviv. s. 153-166.
Tsvek, O.V. 1985. Osoblyvosti formuvannya skhidnoho rehionu trypilʹsʹko-kukutensʹkoyi spilʹnosti. Arkheolohiya, Vyp. 51, s. 31–45.
Tsvek, Ye.V. 1989. Bugo-dneprovskiy variant vostochnotripol'skoy kul'tury: K probleme vydeleniya kul'tur i lokal'nykh variantov Tripol'ya. Pervobytnaya arkheologiya: Materialy i issledovaniya: Sb. nauch. tr. / AN USSR. IA. K.: Nauk. dumka, s. 106–117.
Tsvek, Ye.V. 1995. Veselyy Kut – novyy tsentr vostochnotripol'skoy kul'tury. Arkheologicheskiye vesti, № 4, s. 33–44.
Tsvek,O.V. 1999. Struktura skhidnotrypilʹsʹkoyi kulʹtury. Arkheolohiya, № 3, s. 28–40.
Tsvek, O.V. 2006. Poselennya skhidnotrypilʹsʹkoyi kulʹtury (korotkyy narys). K.
Chernysh, Ye.K. 1951. Tripol'skiye orudiya truda s poseleniya u s. Vladimirovki. KSIIMK, Vyp. XL, s. 85-95.
Yakubenko, O. 2004. Volodymyrivka. V: Videyko, M.Yu. (red.). Entsyklopediya trypilʹsʹkoyi tsyvilizatsiyi, T. 2. Kyiv, s. 104.
Chapman, J. 2017. The Standard Model, the Maximalists and the Minimalists: New Interpretations of Trypillia Mega-Sites. Journal of World Prehistory 30, 3, p. 221–237.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B. 2016. Low-Density Urbanism: The Case of Trypillia Group of Ukraine. In: M. Fernández-Götz/D. Krause (Ed.), Eurasia at the Down of History. Urbanization and Social Change. New York, p. 81–105.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B., Hale, D. 2016. Nebelivka: Assembly Houses, Ditches, and Social Structure. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Eds.) Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 117–131.
Chapman, J., Videiko, M.U., Hale, D., Gaydarska, B., Burdo, N., Rassmann, K., Mischka, C., Müller, J., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Kruts, V. 2014. The Second Phase of the Trypillia Mega-Site Methodological Revolution: A New Research Agenda. European Journal of Archaeology. 17, 3, p. 369–406.
Dal Corso, M., Out, W.A., Ohlrau, R., Hofmann, R., Dreibrodt, S., Videiko, M., Müller, J., Kirleis, W. 2018. Where are the cereals? Contribution of phytolith analysis to the study of subsistence economy at the Trypillia site Maidanetske (ca. 3900-3650 BCE), central Ukraine. Journal of Arid Environments 157, p.137–148.
Dergačev, V. 2002. Die äneolithischen und bronzezeitlichen Metallfunde aus Moldavien. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Diachenko, A., Menotti, F. 2017. Proto-Cities or Non-Proto-Cities? On the Nature of Cucuteni–Trypillia Mega-Sites. Journal of World Prehistory 30, 3, p. 207–219.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B. 2016. Nine Questions for Trypillia Megasite Research. In: Borisov, B.D. Studia in Honorem Professoris Boris Borisov. Veliko Trnovo, p. 179–197.
Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W. 2016. Trypillian Subsistence Economy: Animal and Plant Exploitation. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 195–205.
Hofmann, R., Ţerna, S., Ursu, C. E., Brandtstätter, L., Tiede, H., Mainusch, W., Authenrieth, S. 2016. Spatial organization and population size of small Cucuteni-Tripolye settlements: Results of geomagnetic surveys in Baia and Adâncata, Suceava County, Bucovina, Eastern Romania. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 18, p. 157–189.
Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Hofmann, R., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y., Brandtstätter, L. 2016. Pottery Kilns in Trypillian settlements. Tracing the division of labour and the social organisation of Copper Age communities. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 221–252.
Müller, J. 2016. Demography and Social Agglomeration: Trypilla in a European Perspective. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 7–16.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Brandtstätter, L., Ohlrau, R., Videiko, M. Y. 2016a. Chronology and Demography: How Many People Lived in a Mega-Site? In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 133–170.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Kirleis, W., Dreibrodt, S., Ohlrau, R., Brandtstetter, L., Dal Corso, M., Out, W., Rassmann, K., Burdo, N., Videiko, M. Y. 2016b. Maidanetske 2013 – New excavations at a Trypillia mega-site. Studien zur Archäologie in Ostmitteleuropa 16, Bonn.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Ohlrau, R. 2016c. From Domestic Households to Mega-Structures: Proto-Urbanism? In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory  4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 253–268.
Müller, J., Rassmann, K. 2016. Introduction. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 1–5.
Müller, J., Videiko, M. 2016. Maidanetske: New Facts of a Mega-Site. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 71–93.
Nebbia, M., Gaydarska, B., Millard, A., Chapman, J. 2018. The making of chalcolithic assembly places: Trypillia megasites as materialized consensus among equal strangers? World Archaeology, p. 1–21.
Ohlrau, R. 2015. Trypillia Großsiedlungen: Geomagnetische Prospektion und architektursoziologische Perspektiven (MSc thesis Kiel University). Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 17, p. 17–99.
Ohlrau, R. 2018. Maidanets’ke. Development and decline of a Trypillian mega-site in Central Ukraine (PhD Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel).
Ohlrau, R., Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W., Müller, J. 2016. Living on the Edge? Carrying Capacities of Trypillian Settlements in the Buh-Dnipro lnterfluve. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 207–220.
Pichkur, E. 2012. The flint tools of Andreevka, the Tripolian settlement on the Bolshaya Vys River. In: Menotti, F., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A.G. (eds.). The Tripolye culture giant-settlements in Ukraine: formation, development and decline. Oxford: Oxbow Books, p. 169-182.
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2018. Mining and distribution of flint by the tribes of Cucuteni-Trypillian community. VITA ANTIQUA, 10, Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe, p. 105—118. https://doi.org/10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10-105-117 .
Rassmann, K., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Videiko, M. Y., Müller, J. 2016. The new Challenge for Site Plans and Geophysics: Revealing the Settlement Structure of Giant Settlements by Means of Geomagnetic Survey. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 29–54.
Rassmann, K., Ohlrau, R., Hofmann, R., Mischka, C., Burdo, N., Videjko, M. Y., Müller, J. 2014. High precision Tripolye settlement plans, demographic estimations and settlement organization. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 16, p. 63–95.
Videiko, M., Rassmann, K. 2016. Research on Different Scales: 120 Years of Trypillian Large Sites Research. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 17–28.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Brief «Walk-through» in the Archaeological Ceramic Investigations in the Way to a New Approach in Neolithic Ceramics Styles Research, 138-143

Andriiovych M.P.
University of Bern (Switzerland)

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-138-143
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-138-143
UDK: 903.23”634”

ABSTRACT

The study of ceramic is one of the broadest research areas in archaeological sciences. Over the last two centuries, archaeologists have developed a number of approaches and methods that have had different goals of the studies: from the study of ceramics as an object of art to the reproduction of the manufacture technologies, and the study of pottery as a «mediator» for the study of everyday life of the ancient population.

From the end of the XIX century of the archaeological research scholars looking for different algorithms and strategies in the ceramic studies and attributions. To the end of the XX century, ceramics studies became more complex: from pottery as an object to the technology of the manufacture. Scholars defined methodological groups of the ceramic’s investigation as 1. the description of the technologic information; 2. Form description; 3. Patterns analyses; 4. Reconstruction of the cultural traditions of the pottery. Different methodic together with physical-chemical analyses can prove a theoretical hypothesis. Together with the development of physical methods in archaeological research should also develop the methods of form and pattern analyses and fit to the new archaeological theories’ concepts

The purpose of the article is a brief review of the scientific methods developed at different times in Western and Eastern Europe, North America, and to discover new combinations of research approaches that would allow archaeological ceramic complexes to be explored at a new level. This is especially true of the difficulties encountered in the study of Neolithic utensils, given the incomplete forms of utensils, the relatively small number of finds, and natural damage.

The new paradigm in ceramics investigations is the studies of the raw material of Neolithic cera-mics using natural methods of analysis, such as binocular, p-XRF, spectrographic analyses. The results may open up new knowledge regarding the mobility of the ancient population and the cultural exchange between different groups of the Neolithic population.

Key words: Neolithic, ceramic studies, pottery, migration, cultural exchange.

Language: English

PDF

Cite as:
Andriiovych, M.P. 2019. The Brief «Walk-through» in the Archaeological Ceramic Investigations in the Way to a New Approach in Neolithic Ceramics Styles Research. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 116-137.

References:
Andriiovych, M. 2018. A sign of mobility and cultural exchange? The ceramics with scribble line ornamentation from Lysa Hora cemetery. VITA ANTIQUA, 10, Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe, 43-47. DOI: 10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10-43-47.
Andriiovych, M., Hafner,  A., Shydlovskyi, P. 2019. A sign of mobility and cultural exchange? The ceramics with scribble line ornamentation from Lysa Hora cemetery. In: Beyond Paradigms. 25^th EAA Annual Meeting (Bern, 2019) – Abstract Book, p. 323.
Bobrinskiy, A.A. 1978. The Pottery-Making of Eastern Europe: Sources And Methods of Study, 272 p. (In Russian).
Childe, V.G. 1929. The Danube in Prehistory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Glushkov, I.G. 1996. Ceramics as a historical source. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS, 328 p. (In Russian).
Gorodtsov, V.A. 1901. Russkaya doistoricheskaya keramika. Trudy 11 Arkheologicheskogo syezda  v Kiyeve, p. 576-672. (In Russian).
Heitz, C., Stapfer, R. 2017. Mobility and pottery production, what for? Introductory remarks. In: Mobility and Pottery Production. Archaeological and anthropological perspectives, p. 11 – 39.
Klein, L.S. 2011. Istoriya archeologicheskoy mysli, S.-Pererburg, 694 p. (In Russian).
Kotova, N.S. 2015. Drevneyshaya keramika Ukrainy. Kyiv, 154 p. (In Russian).
Pustovalov, S.Zh. 2001. Classification of Catacomb Ceramics. In: Bronze Age of the Don-Donetsk Region: Materials of the 5^th Ukrainian-Russian Field Archaeological Seminar. Kiev – Voronezh, p. 88 – 95. (In Russian).
Rice, P.M., 1987. Pottery analysis. A Source book, 559 p.
Roberts, B.W., Linden, M.V. 2011. Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability and Transmission.
Shepard, A.O. 1985. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, 414 p.
Stapfer, R. 2017. Special pottery in ‘Cortaillod’ settlements of the Neolithic western Switzerland. In: Mobility and Pottery Production. Archaeological and anthropological perspectives, p. 141 – 167.
Stapfer, R., Heitz, C., Hinz, M., Hafner, A. 2019. Interdisciplinary examinations carried out on heterogeneous coarse ceramics from Neolithic lakeside settlements in the Northern Alpine Foreland (3900-3500 BCE): Analysis strategy and preliminary results from a test series using pXRF, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 25, p. 217 – 238.
Tsetlin, Y.B. 2012. Ancient Ceramics. Theory and Methods of Historical-and Cultural Approach. Moscow: IA RAS, 395 p. (In Russian).
Tsetlin, Y.B. 2017. Ceramics. Concepts and Definitions of the Historical-and-Cultural Approach. Moscow: IA RAS. 346 p. (In Russian).
Voyevodskiy, M.V. 1936. K izucheniyu goncharnoy tekhniki pervobytno-kommunisticheskogo obsh chestva na territorii lesnoy zony Yevropeyskoy chasti RSFSR. Sovetskaya arkheologiya, T. 1, p. 51-79. (In Russian).
Wendrich, W., Barnard, H. 2008. The archaeology of mobility. Definitions and research approaches. In: H. Barnard and W. Wendrich (eds.) The Archaeology of Mobility. Old World and New World Nomadism. Costen Advances Seminar Series 4. Los Angeles: Costen Institute of Archeology, University of California, p. 1-21.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Odessa Dimension of Higher Archaeological Education in the second half of the XIX^th and First Half of the XX^th Century: history, scientific schools, traditions, 60-65

Levchenko V.V.
Odessa National Maritime University

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-60-65
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-60-65
UDK: [902:378](477.74)

ABSTRACT

On the basis of the interdisciplinary approach, the study of the main stages and problems of the development of higher archaeological education in Odessa in the second half of the nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century was conducted. In the nineteenth century the leading center for scientific research on archeology in Odessa was traditionally the Novorossiysk University. In its walls, the accumulation of scientific research in the field of classical archeology and the emergence of the process of institutionalization of archaeological education and science in Odessa. Since 1920 there have been changes in the field of higher education for the training of archaeologists. The elements of the reform of higher education of the Soviet era of the 1920s and 1930s were traced, with its experiments in the field of archaeological education, the process of restoration of historical faculties in 1934 and the revival of the imperial system of higher education during the German-Romanian occupation of Odessa. The Soviet archaeological science in the first post-revolutionary years, which grew up on the foundation of pre-revolutionary archaeology, received organizational continuity, manifested itself in the formation of the state of the Odessa Archaeological Institute and the Odessa State Historical and Archaeological Museum, where during the 1921-1933 biennium the main forces of the Odessa archaeologists were united, and their leading specialists subsequently became part of the Department of History of the Ancient World and the Archeology of the Open 1934 Historical Faculty of the Odessa State University. The process of institutionalization of archaeological research in Odessa took place in difficult socio-political and socio-economic conditions and did not become stable. Despite the cataclysms of the first post-revolutionary times, the constant transformation of the network of universities and scientific institutions, the persecution and death of many specialists, the staff of Odessa scientists was able to promote the development of higher archaeological education in Odessa.

Key words: archaeology, Odessa, higher education, science, archaeological scientists.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Levchenko, V.V. 2019. The Odessa Dimension of Higher Archaeological Education in the second half of the XIX^th and First Half of the XX^th Century: history, scientific schools, traditions (Odeskyi vymir vyshchoi arkheolohichnoi osvity u druhii polovyni KhIKh – pershii polovyni KhKh st.: istoriia, naukovi shkoly, tradytsii). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 60-65 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Borovoy, S.Ya. 1979. K istorii sozdaniya Odesskogo arkheologicheskogo instituta i yego arkheograficheskogo otdeleniya. Arkheograficheskiy yezhegodnik za 1978 god. Moskva, s. 96-101. (in Russian).
Dlozhevskiy, S.S. 1921. Organizatsiya Arkheologicheskogo instituta v Odesse: Istoricheskaya spravka. Narodnoye prosveshcheniye, 2-5, s. 57-63. (in Russian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2008. Odesʹkyy humanitarno-suspilʹnyy instytut (1920–1921): do pytannya spadkoyemnosti tradytsiy universytet·sʹkoyi osvity. Zapysky istorychnoho fakulʹtetu. Odesa. Vyp. 19, s. 207-216. (in Ukrainian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2010. Istoriya Odesʹkoho instytutu narodnoyi osvity (1920–1930 rr.): pozytyvnyy dosvid nevdaloho eksperymentu / Vidp. red. V.M. Khmarsʹkyy; nauk. red. T.M. Popova. Odesa: TES. (in Ukrainian).
Levchenko, V.V. Levchenko G.S. 2012. Muzey izyashchnykh iskusstv Imperatorskogo Novorossiyskogo universiteta: fondy, personalii, sud’ba. Voprosy muzeologii. SPb, 2 (6), s. 105-113. (in Russian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2016. Korotka istoriya Odesʹkoho arkheolohichnoho instytutu: vid zarodzhennya ideyi do yiyi realizatsiyi za initsiatyvoyu «znyzu» ta likvidatsiyi «zverkhu» (do 95-richchya vid dnya zasnuvannya). Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk XI, s. 291-299. (in Ukrainian).
Muzychko, O.Ye. 2012. Odesʹkyy oseredok arkheolohichnoyi pedahohiky naprykintsi ХІХ – 20 -kh rokakh ХХ st. Arkheolohiya i davnya istoriya Ukrayiny. Vyp. 9, s. 177-180. (in Ukrainian).
O nauchnoy rabote istorikov Odessy i Kiyeva. Istorik-marksist, 1941, 6, s. 140-147. (in Russian).
Okhotnikov, S.B. 2010. Arkheologiya v Odesse. In: 185 let Odesskomu arkheologicheskomu muzeyu (1825–2010). Odessa: SMIL. (in Russian).

External reviews: DOWNLOAD