Author: Andr

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Radiocarbon Chronology of the Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic of Crimea, Ukraine, in the Archaeological and Palaeoecological Contexts, 116-137

Yanevich A.A.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-116-137
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-116-137
UDK:902.65(477.75)”632/634”

ABSTRACT

Current corpus of the C14 dates of the final periods of Stone Age of Crimea allows to clarify, and, probably, to revise their chronology. Simultaneously, C14 dates in the proposed chronological scheme correspondence and can be tested by the dates of the paleoecological determinations (geologic, palinologic, microfaunistic and malakofaunistic). Also they are confirmed with the stratigraphic position of the cultural layers.

Shan-Koba culture is the earliest among the 5 accepted cultural phenomena of the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Crimea. Its first stages belong to Allerod and, probably, Bolling, more early warming of the Final Pleistocene. At the same time, the final stage of the Shan-Koba culture is dated as the end of the Boreal.

The bearers of the Sviderian culture are known in the second part of the Drias III and the first part of the Preboreal, Shpan-Koba bearers are known in Preboreal and Boreal. The first stage of the Kukrek culture in Crimea is dated as the first half of the Preboreal, it’s final stage – as the beginning of Atlantikum. Murzak-Koba culture development in the Mountain Crimea belongs to the second half of Boreal and beginning of the Atlantikum.

Two Neolithic cultures are known in Atlantikum: Olexiivka culture in plain Crimea and Tash-Air culture in Mountain Crimea.

Coexistence of the bearers of the several cultures in the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Crimea, sometimes on the same territory, in particular, in the Mountain Crimea, reflect complicated ethno-cultural processes. Some cultures have stabile areal and numerous sites – for example, Shan-Koba, Murzak-Koba and Tash-Air cultures of the Mountain Crimea, Kukrek and Olexiivka culture of the Plain Crimea etc. At once, Sviderian and Span cultures are represented by few sites. They are evidences of the periodical migrations of the some groups of the Northern Ukrainian hunters (Sviderian) or the Steppe hunters of the South of Ukraine (Shpan culture) to Crimea.

Key words: Crimea, Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic, Radiocarbon chronology.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Yanevich, A.A. 2019. Radiocarbon Chronology of the Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic of Crimea, Ukraine, in the Archaeological and Palaeoecological Contexts (Radiovuhletseva khronolohiia finalnoho paleolitu, mezolitu ta neolitu Krymu v arkheolohichnomu ta paleoekolohichnomu kontekstakh). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 116-137 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Bader, O. N. 1940. Izucheniye epipaleolita Krymskoy yayly. SA, 5, s. 93-110. (in Russian)
Bader, O. N. 1957. Nekotoryye pamyatniki paleolita i mezolita v vostochnoy chasti Gornogo Kryma. Istoriya i arkheologiya drevnego Kryma, Kiyev: Izd-vo AN USSR, s. 7-25. (in Russian)
Bader, N. O. 1976. Nekotoryye itogi rabot pod navesom Buran-Kaya v svyazi s issledovaniyami rannego mezolita Kryma. Vostochnaya Yevropa v yepokhu kamnya i bronzy. Moskva: Nauka, s. 27-37. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N. 1940. K voprosu o neolite Kryma. KSIIMK, IV, s. 26-31. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S.N. 1941. Ob ispol’zovanii ulitok Helix v pozdnepaleoliticheskoye vremya (po materialam Krymskoy paleoliticheskoy ekspeditsii v 1935-1936 gg.). MIA, 2, s. 140-141. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N. 1969. Paleolit Kryma. Priroda i razvitiye pervobytnogo obshchestva. Moskva: Nauka, s. 142-154. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N., Stanko, V. N., Koyen, V. Yu. 1994. Final’nyy paleolit i mezolit Gornogo Kryma. Odessa: Vest’. (in Russian)
Bibikova, V. I. 1959. Fauna iz navesa Fat’ma-Koba. KSIA AN USSR, 8, s. 122-124. (in Russian)
Bibikova, V. I. 1982. Ostatki rechnoy vydry (Lutra lutra) iz rannegolotsenovykh otlozheniy Kryma. Vestnik zoologii, 2, s. 8-12. (in Russian)
Bonch-Osmolovskiy, G.A. 1934. Itogi izucheniya krymskogo paleolita. Trudy II mezhdunar. konf. Assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda Yevropy. V, Moskva-Leningrad: Gos. Nauchn.-tekhn. gorno-geologo-neftyanoye izd-vo, s. 114-183. (in Russian)
B’yadzhi, P., Kiosak, D. 2017. Novyye daty dlya final’nogo paleolita i mezolita Gornogo Kryma. Chelovek v istorii i kul’ture, 3, Odesa: Irbis, s. 187-197. (in Russian).
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1951. Epipaleoliticheskaya stoyanka Kukrek v Krymu. KSIIMK, 36, s. 87-95. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1957. Mezoliticheskaya stoyanka Syuren’ II (raskopki 1954-1955 gg.). KSIA AN USSR, 1957, 7, s 7-8. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1961. K voprosu o sviderskoy kul’ture v Krymu (stoyanka Syuren’ II). KSIA AN SSSR, 82, s. 143-149. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1966. K voprosu o svyazyakh naseleniya Kryma v epokhu mezolita. MIA, s. 144-154. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1971. Kamennyy vek Kryma: nekotoryye itogi i problemy. MIA, 173, s. 117-161. (in Russian)
Voyevodskiy, M. V. 1940. K voprosu o razvitii epipaleolita v Vostochnoy Yevrope. SA, 5, s. 144-149. (in Russian)
Gammerman, A. F. 1934. Rezul’taty izucheniya chetvertichnoy flory po ostatkam drevesnogo uglya. Trudy II mezhdunar. konf. Assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda Yevropy. V, Moskva- Leningrad: Gos. Nauchn.-tekhn. gorno-geologo-neftyanoye izd-vo, s. 60-74. (in Russian)
Haskevych, D.L. 2002. Trapetsiyi zi struhanoyu spynkoyu: deyaki zakonomirnosti vynyknennya ta poshyrennya. Arkheolohiya ta etnolohiya Skhidnoyi Yevropy: materialy i doslidzhennya, 3. Odesa: Druk, s. 73-74. (in Ukrainian)
Herasymenko, N.P. 2004. Rozvytok zonalʹnykh landshaftiv chetvertynnoho periodu na terytoriyi Ukrayiny. Avtoreferat dysertatsiyi d. h. n. IHN NANU. (in Ukrainian)
Gromova, V.I., Gromov V.I. 1937. Materialy dlya izucheniya paleoliticheskoy fauny Kryma v svyazi s nekotorymi voprosami statigrafii. Trudy sovetskogo otdeleniya Mezhdunarodnoy assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda, 1, s. 52-93. (in Russian)
Danilenko, V. N. 1969. Neolit Ukrainy: Glavy drevney istorii Yugo-Vostochnoy Yevropy. Kiyev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Dvoryaninov, S.A. 1978. O dneprovskikh mogil’nikakh kamennogo veka. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya Severo-Zapadnogo Prichernomor’ya. Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s. 5-16. (in Russian)
Dmitriyeva, Ye. L. 1960. Fauna krymskikh stoyanok Zamil’-Koba II i Tash-Air I. MIA, 91, s. 166-188. (in Russian)
Zhizn’ zhivotnykh. 1971. Moskva: Prosveshcheniye. (in Russian)
Zaytseva, G.I., Timofeyev, V.I., Zagorsk, I., Kovalyukh, N.N. 1997. Radiouglerodnyye daty mezoliticheskikh pamyatnikov Vostochnoy Yevropy. Radiouglerod i arkheologiya: Yezhegodnik Radiouglerodnoy laboratorii, 2, Sankt-Peterburg: Teza, s. 117-127. (in Russian)
Zaliznyak, L. L. 1998. Peredistoriya Ukrayiny X-V tys. do n.e. Kyyiv: Biblioteka ukrayintsya. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L. L. 2005. Finalʹnyy paleolit ta mezolit kontynentalʹnoyi Ukrayiny. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 8, Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L.L. 2010. Periodyzatsiya ta kulʹturna dyferentsiatsiya verkhnʹoho paleolitu Ukrayiny. Arkheolohiya, 2010, 4, s. 3-19. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L. L., Yanevych, O. O. 1987. Svidersʹki myslyvtsi hirsʹkoho Krymu Arkheolohiya, 60, s. 6-16. (in Ukrainian)
Ynozemtsev, YU. Y., Stupyna, L. V., Tyuleneva, N. V., Paryshev, A. A., Maslakov, N. A., Sydorenko, V. B., Rybak, E. N., Melʹnychenko, T.A., Paslavskaya, O. V. 2014. Paleoheohrafyya Severo-Zapadnoho shelʹfa Chernoho morya v holotsene. Visnyk ONU. Ser.: Heohrafichni ta heolohichni nauky . 19, 1, s. 43-51. (in Russian)
Kaspyyskoe more: Hydrolohyya y hydrokhymyya. 1983. Moskva: Nauka. (in Russian)
Kovalyukh, N. M., Tubolʹtsev, O. V. 1998. Pervye radyokarbonnye daty surskoy kulʹtury. Arkheolohichni vidkryttya v Ukrayini 1997-1998 rr. Kyyiv: NAN Ukrayiny, Instytut arkheolohiyi, s. 80-81. (in Russian)
Koyen, V.Yu. 1994. Hirsʹkokrymsʹka kulʹtura (do problemy kulʹturno-istorychnoyi typolohiyi finalʹnoho  paleolitu). Arkheolohiya, 4, s. 5–19. (in Ukrainian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1960. Raskopki peshchery Kara-Koba v Krymu. KSIA AN USSR, 10, s. 17-22. (in Russian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1963. Nekotoryye voprosy istorii neolita Kryma. SA, 3, s. 257-265. (in Russian)
Kolosov, Yu. H. 1971. Neolit Krymu. Arkheolohiya Ukrayinsʹkoyi RSR, 1, Kyyiv: Naukova dumka, s. 129-137. (in Ukrainian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1985. Neolit Kryma. Arkheologiya Ukrainskoy SSR, 1, Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s 150-156. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S. 1994. Mariupol’skaya kul’turno-istoricheskaya oblast’ (Dnepro-Donskoye mezhdurech’ye). Arkheolohichni pam’yatky ta istoriya starodavnʹoho naselennya Ukrayiny, 1, Luts’k. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S. 2002. Neolitizatsiya Ukrainy. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S , Tubol’tsev, O. V. 2001. Novyye pamyatniki epokhi neolita i eneolita u goroda Melitopolya. Problemy arkheologii i arkhitektury, 1, Arkheologiya, Donetsk-Makeyevka: Institut arkheologii NANU, s. 4-27. (in Russian)
Kraynov, D. A. 1960. Peshchernaya stoyanka Tash-Air I kak osnova dlya periodizatsii poslepaleoliti cheskikh kul’tur Kryma. MIA, 91. Moskva-Leningrad: Nauka. (in Russian)
Manyukhin, I. S. 2014. Kul’turno-istoricheskiy podkhod v arkheologii: proshloye i nastoyashcheye. Gumanitarnyye nauchnyye issledovaniya, 3. Available at: http://human.snauka.ru/2014/03/6187 (in Russian)
Manʹko, V.O. 2006. Neolit Pivdeno-Skhidnoyi Ukrayiny. Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Manʹko, V. O. 2013. Finalʹnyy paleolit – neolit Krymu: kulʹturno-istorychnyy protses, Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Man’ko, V. A., Telizhenko, S. A. 2002. Mezolit, neolit i eneolit Podonech’ya: Katalog radiokarbonnykh dat. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Matskevoy, L. G. 1977. Mezolit i neolit Vostochnogo Kryma. Kiyev: Naukova dumka.
Nuzhnyy, D. Yu. 1992. Rozvytok mikrolitychnoyi tekhniky v kamʺyanomu vitsi. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Opredelitel’ ryb i bespozvonochnykh Kaspiyskogo morya. 1. Ryby i molyuski. 2013, Sankt-Peterburg-Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. (in Russian)
Palamarchuk, S. V. 2019. Petrovskaya Balka – pamyatnik zaklyuchitel’nogo etapa kamennogo veka. Materialy po arkheologii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya, 14, Odessa: Irbis, s. 49-71. (in Russian).
Stanko, V. N. 1985. K probleme zapadnykh svyazey mezolita Stepnogo Prichernomor’ya (po materialam poseleniya Beloles’ye). Novyye materialy po arkheologii Severo-Zapadnogo Prichernomor’ya, Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s. 31-45. (in Russian).
Stupak, D. V. 1999. Tekhnolohiya rozkolyuvannya kremenyu svidersʹkoyi kulʹtury Ukrayinsʹkoho Polissya za analizom nukleusiv. VITA ANTIQUA, 2, s. 18-25. (in Ukrainian)
Telehin, D. Ya. 1982. Mezolitychni pamʺyatky Ukrayiny (IХ – VI tysyacholittya do n. e.). Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Telegin, D. Ya., Nechitaylo, A. L., Potekhina, I. D., Panchenko, Yu. V. 2001. Srednestogovskaya i novodanilovskaya kul’tury eneolita Azovo-Chernomorskogo regiona. Arkheologo-antropologicheskiy analiz materialov i katalog pamyatnikov. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Telegin, D. Ya. 1991. Neoliticheskiye mogil’niki mariupol’skogo tipa. Kiyev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Telizhenko, S. A., Yanish, Ye. Yu. 2015. Hospodarsʹka diyalʹnistʹ naselennya Pivdennoho uzberezhzhya Krymu v eneoliti – bronzi (za materialamy stoyanky Ardych Burun). Terra Alustiana, MMXI. Symferopolʹ: Antiqua, s. 38-57. (in Ukrainian)
Tovkaylo, M.T. 2003. Krem’yanyy inventar piznʹoneolitychnykh pamʺyatok Stepovoho Pobuzhzhya. Kam’yana doba Ukrayiny, 2, s. 187-206. (in Ukrainian)
Formozov, A. A. 1954. Issledovaniye stoyanok kamennogo veka v Krymu KSIIMK, 54, s. 62-70. (in Russian)
Formozov, A. A. 1962. Neolit Kryma i Chernomorskogo poberezh’ya Kavkaza. MIA, 102. Moskva: Nauka, s. 89-149. (in Russian)
Chabay, V. P. 2004. Sredniy paleolit Kryma. Kiyev: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1987a. Pozdniy mezolit i neolit Kryma (Voprosy stanovleniya neoliticheskoy kul’tury), Avtoreferat dissertatsiy k. i. n. IA NANU AN USSR. (in Russian)
Yanevych, O.O. 1987b. Etapy rozvytku kulʹtury Kukrek v Krymu. Arkheolohiya, 58, s. 7-18. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1990a. K probleme zapadnykh geneticheskikh svyazey rannego mezolita Gornogo Kryma. Problemy pervobytnoy arkheologii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya (K 100-letiyu osnovaniya Khersonskogo muzeya drevnostey). Tez. dokl., 1. Kherson, s. 27-28. (in Russian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1990b. K vydeleniyu novogo kul’turnogo yavleniya v mezolite Kryma. Problemy issledovaniya pamyatnikov arkheologii Severskogo Dontsa. Lugansk, s. 38-40. (in Russian)
Yanevych, O. O. 1993. Shpansʹka mezolitychna kulʹtura. Arkheolohiya, 1, s. 3-15. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych,  O.  O.  2004.  Tash-Ayirsʹka  neolitychna  kulʹtura  Hirsʹkoho  Krymu  (suchasnyy  stan  doslidzhennya). Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 5, s. 169-191. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O. O. 2007. Oleksiyivsʹka neolitychna kulʹtura Rivnynnoho Krymu. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 10, s .203-222. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O.O. 2008. Khronolohiya piznʹomezolitychnoyi murzak-kobynsʹkoyi kulʹtury Hirsʹkoho Krymu. Doslidzhennya pervisnoyi arkheolohiyi v Ukrayini (Do 50-richchya vidkryttya paleolitychnoyi stoyanky Radomyshlʹ), Kyyiv: PP «Korvin-Press», c. 135-146. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O.O. 2010. Svider Krymu v konteksti finalʹnoho paleolitu ta rannʹoho mezolitu pivdnya  Skhidnoyi Yevropy. Matéryyaly pa arkheolohii Belarusi, 18, s. 56-65. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O. O. 2017. Mys Triytsi 1 – kukretsʹka pamyatka na Pivdennomu berezi Krymu. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 17-18, s. 175-187. (in Ukrainian)
Yanko-Khombakh, V. V., Smyntyna, Ye. V., Kadurin, S. V., Larchenkov, Ye.P., Motnenko, I. V., Kakaranza, S. V., Kiosak, D. V. 2011. Kolebaniya urovnya Chernogo morya i adaptatsionnaya strategiya drevnego cheloveka za posledniye 30 tysyach let. Geologiya i poleznyye iskopayemyye Mirovogo okeana, 2, s. 61-94. (in Russian).
Aksu, A. E., Hiscott, R. N., Mudie, P. J., Rochon, A., Kaminski, M. A., Abrajano, T., Yasar D. 2002. Persistent Holocene Outflow from the Black Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean Contradicts Noah’s Flood Hypothesis. GSA today. A Publication of the Geological Society of America, 12, 5, p. 4-10.
Archaeometry. 37(1), 1995, p. 195-214.
Benecke, N. 1999. Die Tierreste aus dem mesolithischen Abri Span-Koba im Krimgebirge. Beitrage zur Archaozoologie und Prahistorischen Antropologie, II, s. 71-90.
Benecke, N. 2006. Zur Datierung der Faunensequenz am Abri San-Koba (Krim, Ukraine). Beitrage zur Archäozoologie und Prähistorischen Anthropologie, 5, 2006, s. 12-15.
Biagi, Р. 2016. The Last Hunter-Gatherers of the Northern Coast of the Black Sea and their Role in the Mesolithic of Europe: A View from Crimea. Southeast Europe before neolitiisation. Proceedings of the International Workshop within the Collaborative Research Centres sfb 1070 “RessourcenKulturen”, Schloss Hohentübingen, 9 th of May 2014. Tubingen, p. 113-131.
Biagi, P., Zaliznyak, L., Kozlovski, S. K. 2007. Old problems and news perspectives for the radiocarbon chronology of the Ukranian Mezolithic. IGCP (International Geoscience Programme) 521-481 Joint Meeting and Field Trip, Gelendzhik (Russia) – Kerch (Ukraine), September 8-17, 2007. р. 27-29.
Biagi, P., Khlopachev, G. A., Kiosak, D. V. 2014. The radiocarbon Chronology of Shan-Koba rock shelter, a Late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sequence in the Crimean mountains (Ukraine). Diadora, 28, p. 7-20.
Carss, D. N. 1995. Foraging Behaviour and Freeding Ecology of the Otter Lutra Lutra: a selective review. Hystrix, (n.s.) 7 (1-2). p. 179-194.
Cohen, V. 1996. Neolithization of the Crimean mountains (current stage of investigations). Prehistoire Europeenne, 9, p. 417-435.
Cohen, V., Gerasimenko, N., Rekovetz, L., Starkin, A. 1996. Chronostrathigraphie of Rockchelter Skalisty: implementations for the Late Glacial of Crimea. Prehistoire Europeene, 9, р. 326-356.
Cordova, C. E., Gerasimenko, N., Lehman, P. 2011. Late Pleistocene and Holocene paleoenvironments of Crimea: Pollen, soils, geomorphology, and geoarchaeology. Chapter in Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, January, 2011, p. 133-164, DOI: 10.1130/2011.2473(09).
Gorobets, L., Kovalchuk, O., Rekovets, L. 2013. Vertebrates from the Mesolithic site Laspi VII (Crimea, Ukraine). Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Біологія, 3(65), с. 57-59.
Gerasimenko, N. 2004. Vegetetional history of Buran-Kaya III. In: Chabai V. P., Monigal, K., Marks, A. E. (ed.). The Paleolithic of Crimea. III. The Middle Paleolithic and Early Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Crimea, 3, ERAUL, 104, p. 19-34.
Hiscott, R. N., Aksu, A. E., Mudieb, P. J., Marretc, F., Abrajano, T., Kaminski, M. A., Evanse, J., Cakirioglu, A. I., Yasar, D. 2006. A gradual drowning of the southwestern Black Sea shelf: Evidence for a progressive rather than abrupt Holocene reconnection with the eastern Mediterranean Sea through the Marmara Sea Gateway. Quaternary International (2006), doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2006.11.007.
Janevič A. 1995. Die Neolithisierung auf der Krim. Kulturaspekte. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 70, s. 2-35.
Janevic A. 1999. Das Swiderien der Krim. Tanged points cultures in Europe. Libelskie materialy archeologiczne, XIII, Lublin, s. 36-46.
Kertesz, R. 2001. The Mesolithic in the Great Hungarian Plain: A Survey of the Evidence. Proceedings of the International Archaeological Conference held in the Damjanich Museum of Szolnoc, September 22-27, 1996. Budapest, p. 3-51.
Kozlowski, S. K. 2001. Eco-Cultural/Stylistic Zonation of the Mezolithic/Epipalaeolithic in Central Europe. From the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Proceedings of the International Archaeological Conference held in the Damjanich Museum of Szolnoc, September 22-27, 1996. Budapest, p. 261-282.
Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G, Telizhenko, S., Jones, M. K., 2013. The earliest evidence of domesticated wheatin the Crimea at Chalcolithic Ardych-Burun. Journal of Field Archaeology, 38, 2, p. 120-128.
Nuzhnyi, D. 1998. The Ukrainian Steppe as a region of intercultural contacts between atlantic and mediterranean zones of european Mesolithic. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 5, p. 102-119.
Ostrauskas, T. 1999. Velyvasis paleolitas ir mesolitas Pietu Lietuvoje. Lietuvos archeologija, 16, р. 7-17.
Salavert, A., Messager E., Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute G., Lebreton V., Bayle G., Crépin, L., Puaud, S., Péan, S., Yamada, M., Yanevich, Y. 2014 First results of archaeobotanical analysis from Neolithic layers of Buran Kaya IV (Crimea, Ukraine). Environmental Archaeology, 20(3), DOI: 10.1179/1749631413Y.0000000016 .
Schild, R. 1965. Pozny paleolit Krymu a Cykl mazowszanski. Archeologia Polski, X, 2, p. 431-473.
Schild, R., Pazdur, M. F., Vogel, J. C. 1999. Radiochronology of the tanged point technocomplex in Poland. Tanged points cultures in Europe. Lubelskie materialy archeologiczne, XIII, Lublin, р. 13-16.
Yanevich, A.A. 1998. The Neolithic of the mountainous Crimea. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 5, p. 146-159.
Zaitseva, G.I., Timofeev, V.I., Zagorska, I., Kovaliuk, N.N. 2000. Radiocarbon dates of the Mesolithic sites in Eastern Europe. Radiocarbon and Archaeology, 1, 2000, p. 33-52.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
New Study of Fourth Dwelling from Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic Campsite: the results of International Summer School activity, 92-115

Shydlovskyi P.S.¹, Tsvirkun O.I.², Péan S.³, Chymyrys M.V.¹, Mamchur B.V.^4
1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
² National University ‘Kyiv-Mohyla Academy’, National Museum of the History of Ukraine
³ Muséum national d’histoire naturelle (France)
4 University of Ferrara (Italy)

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-92-115
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-92-115
UDK: [903.3:378.147](477.46)

ABSTRACT

Mezhyrich is an Epigravettian open air base camp, in the Middle Dnieper basin, dated to 14.9 - 14,3 ka ¹⁴C BP. During the second stage of research from 1976 to 1989 an international group of specialists under supervision of M. Gladkikh – the Head of the Department of Archaeology, Ethnography and Museology of T. Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, carried out the excavations and interdisciplinary research of the site. As the result in 1976 fourth mammoth bone dwelling and a field objects around it were opened. The fourth dwelling was partially excavated and left in place for the purpose of a future museumification. An exploration of the cultural layer of the dwelling unit revealed a number of interesting finds and field objects. The stratigraphic sections within this trench revealed several stages of functioning of this object and several layers of human activity.

Since 2018, the Dwelling 4 has been explored by an expedition involving organizations such as the Department of Archeology and Museum Studies at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (P. Shydlovskyi), National Museum of Natural History, France (S. Péan) with the involvement specialists in the field of zooarchaeology, geology, geomorphology, etc. As the current state of affairs requires a new description of the dwelling elements, one of the goals of the 2018-2019 study was to conduct stationary studies of the filling of the dwelling. This works have to be continue in order to obtain data on structural features and the degree of preservation of cultural remains inside the dwelling, and to carry out restoration work to provide a basis for future museuming of the object.

Key words: Upper Palaeolithic, Epigravettian, household unit, mammoth bone dwelling, lithic technology, mammoth hunters.

Language: English

PDF

Cite as:
Shydlovskyi, P.S., Tsvirkun, O.I., Péan, S., Chymyrys, M.V., Mamchur, B.V. 2019. New Study of Fourth Dwelling from Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic Campsite: the results of International Summer School activity. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 92-115.

References:
Adovasio, J., Lenz, B. 1996. Mikrostratigrafiya yamy 4 i zhilishcha 4. Appendix 2. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o raskopkakh pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1995 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1995/96, p. 43-47.
Gladkikh, M. 1977. Nekotoryye kriterii opredeleniya kul’turnoy prinadlezhnosti pozdnepaleoliticheskikh pamyatnikov. In: Problemy paleolita Vostochnoy i Tsentral’noy Yevropy. Leningrad: Nauka, p. 137-143.
Gladkikh, М. 1999. Drevneyshaya arkhitektura po arkheologicheskim istochnikam epokhi paleolita. VITA ANTIQUA, 1. Kiev, p. 29-33. https://vitaantiqua.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/004VA01-gladkikh.pdf
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1979a. Nova sporuda z kistok mamonta v Mezhyrichi. Visnyk AN URSR, 9. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, p. 50-54.
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1979b. Otchet o raskopkakh Mezhirichskogo pozdnepaleoticheskogo poseleniya v 1978 godu. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1978/106, 44 p.
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1982. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1979-1981 gg. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1979-81/143, 35 p.
Haesaerts, P., Péan, S., Valladas, H., Damblon, F., Nuzhnyi, D. 2015. Contribution à la stratigraphie du site paléolithique de Mezhyrich (Ukraine), L’anthropologie, 119 (4). Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérior en Ukraine: Mezhyrich, p. 364-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2015.07.002
Kornietz, N.L. 1995. Otchet o rabote pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1994 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #114.
Kornietz, N.L., Gladkikh, M.I., Velichko, A.A., Antonova, V.G., Gribchenko, Yu.N., Zelikson, Ye.M., Kurenkova, Ye.I., Khalcheva, T.A., Chepalyga, A.L. 1981. Mezhyrich. In: Arkheologiya i paleogeografiya pozdnego paleolita Russkoy ravniny. Moscow: Nauka, p. 106-119.
Kornietz N.L., Suntsov Yu.V., Soffer O. 1996. Otchet o raskopkakh pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1995 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1995/96.
Nuzhnyi, D. 2002. Verkhnʹopaleolitychni pamiyatky typu Mezhyrich ta yikh mistse sered epihravettsʹkykh kompleksiv Serednʹoho Dnipra. Kamiyana doba Ukraiyny, 1. Kyiv: Shlyakh, p. 57-81.
Nuzhnyi, D. 2008. The epigravettian variability of the middle Dnieper river basin. In: Doslidzhennya pervisnoyi arkheolohiyi v Ukrayini. Proceedings of the international conference. Kyiv: Korvin-Press, p. 96-134.
Nuzhnyi, D.Yu., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2015. Variabilité de l’industrie lithique entre les structures de l’ha bitation n° 1 de Mezhyrich, site du Paléolithique supérieur d’Ukraine. L’Anthropologie, 119 (4). Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérior en Ukraine: Mezhyrich, p. 394-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2015.07.003
Péan, S., Prat, S., Nuzhnyi, D. (eds). 2015a. Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérieur en Ukraine: Mezhyrich. L’Anthropologie, 119 (4).
Pidoplichko, I. 1969. Pozdnepaleoliticheskiye zhilishcha iz kostey mamonta na Ukraine. Kiev: Naukova dumka.
Pidoplichko, I. 1976. Mezhirichskiye zhilishcha iz kostey mamonta. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 239 p.
Samoilenko, L.H., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2016. Mezhyrich settlement: What will be future of our past? Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, History, 131 (4), p. 62-69. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223
Shydlovskyi, P. 2013. Doslidzhennya ta problemy zberezhennya Mezhyritsʹkoho poselennya myslyvtsiv na mamontiv. Pratsi Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu pamyatkookhoronnykh doslidzhenʹ,  8. Kyiv, p. 567-581. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1188708
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Priadko, D. 2012. Doslidzhennya pizniopaleolitychnoho poselennya Mezhyrich. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2011. Kyiv, p. 474-475. https://www.academia.edu/29957239/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Semenova, A. 2013. Doslidzhennya hospodarsʹkykh obyektiv Mezhyritsʹkoyi stoyanky. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2012. Kyiv, p. 368-370. https://www.academia.edu/19142872/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S. 2014. Doslidzhennya dilyanky na pivdenʹ vid pershoho mezhy ritsʹkoho zhytla. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2013. Kyiv, p. 268-270. https://www.academia.edu/30571251/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Lyzun, O. 2015. Doslidzhennya hospodarsʹkoyi yamy №6 na Mezhyritsʹkiy stoyantsi. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2014. Kyiv, p. 259-261. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1202444
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Haesaerts, P., Lyzun, O. 2016. Doslidzhennya zony aktyvnoyi hospodarsʹkoyi diyalʹnosti pershoho HPK Mezhyritsʹkoyi stoyanky. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2015. Kyiv, p. 210-213. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1205919
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Crépin, L., Tsvirkun, O. 2018. Investigating a Prehistoric mammoth bone dwelling: from field and lab research to education. Quaternary Perspectives, 25 (2), p. 18-19. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2631382
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Tsvirkun, O. 2019. Archaeological context of Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic settlement with mammoth bone dwelling structures. Quaternary Perspectives, 26 (1), p. 11-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333534353_
Snider, J. 1994. Restavratsionnaya rabota na stoyanke Mezhirich. Appendix 6. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1993 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE №129, p. 40-43.
Soffer, O. 1993. Vozrast stoyanki po dannym radiouglerodnogo analiza (C 14). Appendix 3. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1992 godu. Kiev: Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE, p. 25-27.
Soffer, O., Adovasio, J.M., Kornietz, N.L., Velichko, A.A., Gribchenko, Yu.N., Lenz, B.R., Suntsov, V.Yu. 1997. Cultural stratigraphy at Mezhirich, an Upper Palaeolithic site in Ukraine with multiple occupations. Antiquity, 71 (271), 48-62.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Experience in the Implementation of Experimental Studies in Stone Age Archaeology: education, science and museum studies, 78-91

Ryzhov S.M.¹, Stepanchuk V.M.², Vetrov V.S.³, Naumenko O.O.¹, Pogorilets O.H.^3
1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
²Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
³Mezhibizh State Historical and Cultural Reserve

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-78-91
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-78-91
UDK: [902:378].001.4

ABSTRACT

At the present stage, research in archaeology is inextricably linked with the testing and verification of various methods. One of these methods in archaeology include experiment. At the same time, in the process of research work there is a need to train young scientists who are able to master new methods of processing and interpretation of archaeological material.

For the last 5 years, experimental sites and an experimental laboratory have been established on the basis of the Department of Archaeology and Museum Studies at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv and the State Historical and Cultural Reserve “Mezhibizh” with the participation of the Institute of Archaeology of NAS of Ukraine. Experimental research methodology was developed and an electronic database was created using the latest technologies of material fixation, processing and visualization.

At this stage, an experimental program for the study and reconstruction of the ancient stone knapping methods and techniques in the Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine is being implemented.

The methodological aspects of carrying out the experimental program “The first techniques and technologies of the early prehistory of Ukraine” are presented in the paper.

Key words: experimental studies, experimental map, technique, technology of knapped stone, Lower Paleolithic.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Ryzhov, S.M., Stepanchuk, V.M., Vetrov, V.S., Naumenko, O.O., Pogorilets, O.H. 2019. Experience in the Implementation of Experimental Studies in Stone Age Archaeology: education, science and museum studies (Dosvid vprovadzhennia eksperymentalnykh doslidzhen v arkheolohii kamianoho viku: osvita, nauka ta muzeieznavstvo). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 66-77 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Bandrivskyi, M., Hnatiuk, R., Stepanchuk, V. 2018. Nove nyzhnopaleolitychne mistseznakhodzhennia Skhidnytsia II u pivnichno-skhidnii chastyni Beskydiv. Materialy i doslidzhennia z arkheolohii Prykarpattia i Volyni 22, s. 223–235. (in Ukrainian).
Hyria, E.Yu., 1997. Tekhnolohycheskyi analyz kamennykh industryi: metodyka mykro-makroanalyza drevnykh orudyi truda. Chast 2. Sankt-Peterburh. (in Russian).
Korobkova, H.F., Shchelynskyi, V.E., 1996. Metodyka mykro-makroanalyza drevnykh orudyi truda. Chast 1. Arkheolohycheskye yzyskanyia. Sankt-Peterburh. (in Russian).
Ryzhov, S.M., 2004. Kremiani vykhody Kanivskoho Prydniprovia. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, s. 112–119. (in Ukrainian).
Semenov, S.A., 1957. Pervobytnaia tekhnyka. Materyaly i issledovanyia po arkheolohyi SSSR. Lenynhrad. (in Russian).
Semenov, S.A., 1963. Razvitie tekhnyky v kamennom veke. Leninhrad: Nauka. (in Russian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Pohorilets, O.H., 2012. Medzhybizh: nyzhnopaleolitychna pamiatka na skhid vid Karpat. Arkheolhiia 4, s. 5–13. (in Ukrainian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Karmazynenko, S.P., 2013a. Davnia liudyna. Paleoheohrafiia ta arkheolohiia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Karmazynenko, S.P., Muan, A.-M., 2013b. Pervye itohy izuchenyia nizhnepaleoliticheskikh mestonakhozhdenyi Medzhybozha. Medzhybizh i problemy vyvchennia nyzhnoho paleolitu Skhidnoievropeiskoi rivnyny, s. 22–48. (in Russian).
Stepanchuk V.M., Vetrov V.S., Skorikov V.A. 2017. Doslidzhennia nyzhnoho paleolitu rivnynnoi Ukrainy, ohliad potochnykh danykh. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, vyp. 17—18, s. 48—65. (in Ukrainian).
Anderson, P.C. 1980. A testimony of prehistoric tasks: Diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges. World Archaeology 12, pp. 181–194. doi:10.1080/00438243.1980.9979791
Andrefsky Jr., W. 2008. Lithic technology, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Andrefsky, W. 2005. Macroscopic approaches to analysis. doi:10.2307/2694821
Andrefsky, W. 2008. Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499661
Ascher, R. 1961. Experimental Archeology. American Anthropologist 63, pp. 793–816. doi:10.1525/aa.1961.63.4.02a00070
Audouze, F., Bodu, P., Karlin, C., Julien, M., Pelegrin, J., Perlès, C. 2017. Leroi-Gourhan and the chaîne opératoire: a response to Delage. World Archaeology 49, pp. 718–723. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1416012
Balme, J., Paterson, A. 2006. Archaeology in practice: a student guide to archaeological analyses. Blackwell Pub.
Boëda, E., 2005. Paléo-technologie ou anthropologie des Techniques? Noûs 1, pp. 46–64.
Bril, B., Smaers, J., Steele, J., Rein, R., Nonaka, T., Dietrich, G., Biryukova, E., Hirata, S., Roux, V. 2012. Functional mastery of percussive technology in nut-cracking and stone-flaking actions: Experimental comparison and implications for the evolution of the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, pp. 59–74. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0147
Clarkson, C., O’Connor, S. 2013. An Introduction to Stone Artefact Analysis. In: Archaeology in Practice: A Student Guide to Archaeological Analyses. pp. 151–206. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.015
Coles, J.M. 1979. Experimental archaeology. London: Academic Press.
Cotterell, B., Kamminga, J. 1987. The Formation of Flakes. American Antiquity 52, pp. 675–708. doi:10.2307/281378
Coupaye, L. 2015. Chaîne opératoire, transeCts et théories : quelques réflexions et suggestions sur le parcours d’une méthode Classique. In: André Leroi-Gourhan, L’homme Tout Simplement: Mémoires et Postérité d’André Leroi-Gourhan. pp. 69–84.
Crabtree, D.E. 1982. An Introduction to the Technology of Stone Tools. Occasional Papers of the Idaho Museum of Natural History 28. Pocatello.
Delage, C. 2017. Once upon a time…the (hi)story of the concept of the chaîne opératoire in French prehistory. World Archaeology 49, pp. 158–173. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1300104
Dibble, H.L., Rezek, Z. 2009. Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force. Journal of Archaeological Science 36, pp. 1945–1954. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.004
Dibble, H.L., Whittaker, J.C. 1981. New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation. Journal of Archaeological Science 8, pp. 283–296. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(81)90004-2
Eren, M.I., Lycett, S.J., Patten, R.J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J.,  O’Brien, M.J. 2016. Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology.  Ethnoarchaeology. doi:10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
Flores, J.R., Paardekooper, R. 2014. Experiments Past. Histories of Experimental Archaeology. Sidestone Pres.
Foulds, F.W.F. 2013. Experimental Archaeology and Theory: Recent Approaches to Archaeological Hypotheses. doi:10.13140/2.1.4272.7203
Frick, J.A., Herkert, K. 2014. Lithic Technology and Logic of Technicity, Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte.
Stone, P.G., Planel, P.G. 2004. The Constructed Past Experimental archaeology, education and the public, First Edit. ed, One World Archaeology. Routledge.
Geribàs, N., Mosquera, M., Vergès, J.M. 2010. What novice knappers have to learn to become expert stone toolmakers. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, pp. 2857–2870. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.026
Goodale, N., Andrefsky, W. 2015. Lithic Technological Systems and Evolutionary Theory. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139207775
Goodyear, A.C. 1993. Tool Kit Entropy and Bipolar Reduction: A Study of Interassemblage Lithic Variability among Paleo-Indian Sites in the Northeastern United States. North American Archaeologist 14, pp. 1–23. doi:10.2190/HN4D-3MNN-5NRX-QPC8
Grace, R. 1972. Interpreting the Function of Stone Tools, 1–33.
Hecht, E.E., Gutman, D.A., Khreisheh, N., Taylor, S. V., Kilner, J., Faisal, A.A., Bradley, B.A., Chaminade, T., Stout, D. 2015. Acquisition of Paleolithic toolmaking abilities involves structural remodeling to inferior frontoparietal regions. Brain Structure and Function 220, pp. 2315–2331. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0789-6
Herrygers, C. 2002. A Comparative Analysis of Wood Residues on Experimental Stone Tools and Early Stone Age Artifacts: A Koobi Fora Case Study A Comparative Analysis of Wood Residues on Experimental Stone Tools. McNair Scholars Journal 6, pp. 65–75.
Holmes, W.H. 1894. Natural history of flaked stone implements. In: Wake, C. S. (Ed.), Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, Schulte, Chicago. pp. 120–139.
Hranicky, W.J. 2002. Experimental Archaeology. In: Lithic Technology in the Middle Potomac River Valley of Maryland and Virginia. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 252–271. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0615-7_11
Hughes, R.E., Ryzhov, S. 2018. Trace element characterization of obsidian from the Transcarpathian Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 19, pp. 618–624. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.03.030
Hurcombe, L. 2014. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. doi:10.4324/9780203827536
Inizan, M.-L., Roche, H., Tixier, J. 1992. Technology of knapped stone. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée 127.
Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., Tixier, J. 1999. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone, CREP, Nanterre.
Johnson, L. 1978. A history of flint-kinapping experimentation, 1838-1976. Current Anthropology 19, pp. 337–372.
Keeley, L.H. 1974. Technique and methodology in microwear studies: A critical review. World Archaeology 5, pp. 323–336. doi:10.1080/00438243.1974.9979577
Keeley, L.H. 1980. Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KimballKeeley, L.H., Toth, N. 1981. Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature 293, pp. 464–465. doi:10.1038/293464a0
Key, A., Dunmore, C.J., Hatala, K.G., Williams-Hatala, E.M. 2017. Flake morphology as a record of manual pressure during stone tool production. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 12, pp. 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.023
Key, A., Merritt, S.R., Kivell, T.L. 2018. Hand grip diversity and frequency during the use of Lower Palaeolithic stone cutting-tools. Journal of Human Evolution 125, pp. 137–158. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.006
Key, A.J.M., Lycett, S.J. 2011. Technology based evolution? A biometric test of the effects of handsize versus tool form on efficiency in an experimental cutting task. Journal of Archaeological Science 38, pp. 1663–1670. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.032
Kononenko, N., Torrence, R., White, P. 2015. Unexpected uses for obsidian: Experimental replication and use-wear/residue analyses of chopping tools. Technical Reports of the Australian Museum, Online 54, pp. 254–269. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.010
Korobkova, G.F. 2008. S.A. Semenov and new perspectives on the experimental-traceological method. In: British Archaeological Reports – International Series; 1783 / Proceedings of the International Congress, Verona (Italy), 20-23 April 2005. pp. 3–8.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1993. Gesture and Speech (October Books). The MIT Press.
Leroi-Gourhan, A.B.-A.M. 1964. Le Geste et la Parole, tome 1: Technique et Langage. Albin Michel.
Millson, D.C.E. 2011. Experimentation and interpretation: the use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past. Papers from a session held at the annual Theoretical Archaeology Group TAG Conference in Southampton England Dec 2008. Oxbow Books.
Moclán, A., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. 2018. An experimental study of the patterned nature of anthropogenic bone breakage and its impact on bone surface modification frequencies. Journal of Archaeological Science 96, pp. 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.007
Muller, A. 2017. The role of experimental knapping in empirically testing key themes in the evolution of lithic technology: reduction intensity, efficiency and behavioural complexity. School of Social Science.
Newcomer, M.H.H., Sieveking, G.D.G. 1980. Experimental Flake Scatter-Patterns: a New Interpretative Technique. Journal of Field Archaeology 7, pp. 345–352. doi:10.1179/009346980791505392
Nonaka, T., Bril, B., Rein, R. 2010. How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution 59, pp. 155–167.  doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006
Odell, G.H. 1996. Stone Tools. Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. doi: 10.1525/aa.1999.101.4.852
Odell, G.H. 2003. Lithic Analysis. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. doi:10.1080/2052546.2003.11949321
Odell, G.H. 2004. Tool Function. In: Lithic Analysis. pp. 135–245.
Outram, A.K., 2008. Introduction to experimental archaeology. World Archaeology 40, рр. 1–6. doi:10.1080/00438240801889456
Phillips, P. 1988. Traceology (microwear) studies in the USSR. World Archaeology 19, pp. 349–356. doi:10.1080/00438243.1988.9980045
Pitts, M., Keeley, L.H. 2006. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. Man 16, p. 480. doi:10.2307/2801305
Putt, S.S. 2015. The origins of stone tool reduction and the transition to knapping: An experimental approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2, pp. 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.01.004
Rosania, C.N., Boulanger, M.T., Biró, K.T., Ryzhov, S., Trnka, G., Glascock, M.D. 2008. Revisiting Carpathian obsidian. Antiquity 82, pp. 1986–1988.
Ryzhov, S. 2014. Obsidian outcrops in Ukrainian Transcarpathians and their use during the paleolitic time. Eraul 138, pp. 117–133.
Ryzhov, S. 2018. Archaeological and geological studies of obsidians in Ukrainian Transcarpathia. Archeometriai Műhely XV, pp. 225–230.
Ryzhov, S., Karmazinenko, S. 2015. Velykyj Sholes: Preliminary Results on a New Site of the Lower Palaeolithic in Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In: Yamada, M. and, Ryzhov, S. (Eds.), Archaeology and Geology of Ukraine in Regional Context. Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Meiji University, pp. 65–83.
Ryzhov, S., Stepanchuk, V., Sapozhnikov, I. 2005. Raw material provenance the Palaeolithic of Ukraine: state of problem. Current approaches and first results. Archeometriai Muhely 4, pp. 17–25.
Ryzhov, S.M., Karmazinenko, S., Bondar, K., Matviishyna, Z., Veklych, Y., Tymofeieva, Z. 2017. Preliminary results of geo-archaeological research in the new Lower Paleolithic site of Velykyj Sholes in Ukranian Transcarpathia. XІ International Scientific Conference “Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment” 11–14 October 2017, Kyiv, Ukraine. EAGE, pp. 168–173. doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201800092
Schiffer, M.B. 2013. Contributions of Experimental Archaeology. In: Experimental Laws and the Modern Era of Flint-knapping Experiments. pp. 43–52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_4
Schiffer, M.B., Skibo, J.M. 1987. Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28, pp. 595–622. doi:10.1086/203601
Semenov, S.A. 1964. Prehistoric technology an experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts fom traces of manufacture and wear. Adams and Dart, Bath.
Shea, J.J., Klenck, J.D. 1993. An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic microwear analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 20, pp. 175–194. doi:10.1006/jasc.1993.1013
Shinde, V. 2015. An experimental study of the technology of stone tool manufacture. Bulletin of deccan college post graguate and research indstitute, 47–48, pp. 311–320.
Shott, M.J. 2003. Chaîne Opératoire and Reduction Sequence. Lithic Technology 28, pp. 95–105. doi:10.1080/01977261.2003.11721005
Speth, J.D. 1972. Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking: Some Comments. American Antiquity 37, pp. 34–60. doi:10.2307/279229
Stemp, W.J., Watson, A.S., Evans, A.A. 2016. Surface analysis of stone and bone tools. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties 4, pp. 1-25. doi:10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/013001
Stepanchuk, V., Ryzhov, S., Rekovets, L., Matviishina, Z. 2010. The Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine: Current evidence. Quaternary International, 223–224, pp. 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2009.12.006
Stout, D., Hecht, E., Khreisheh, N., Bradley, B., Chaminade, T., Grafman, J. 2015. Cognitive Demands of Lower Paleolithic Toolmaking. PLoS ONE 10, pp. 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121804
Preliminary report on obsidian petrography from the Transcarpathian region in Ukraine. Natural Resource Environment and Humans, 4, pp. 21–37.
Swanson, E.H. 1975. Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools. Walter de Gruyter.
Toth, N. 1987. Behavioral inferences from Early Stone artifact assemblages: an experimental model. Journal of Human Evolution 16, pp. 763–787. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(87)90023-6
Venditti, F., Tirillò, J., Garcea, E.A. 2016. Identification and evaluation of post-depositional mechanical traces on quartz assemblages: An experimental investigation. Quaternary International 424, pp. 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.046
Venditti, F., Cristiani, E., Nunziante-Cesaro, S., Agam, A., Lemorini, C., Barkai, R. 2019. Animal residues found on tiny Lower Paleolithic tools reveal their use in butchery. Scientific Reports 9 (1), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49650-8
Whittaker, J.C. 1994. Flintknapping making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Words, K.E.Y., Audouze, F. 2002. Leroi-Gourhan, a philosopher of technique and evolution. Journal of Archaeological Research 10, pp. 277–306. doi:10.1023/A:1020599009172
Young, R.W. 2003. Evolution of the human hand: The role of throwing and clubbing. Journal of Anatomy, pp. 165–174. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00144.x

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Dialogue of Two Archaeologists 1963-2020: scientific diplomacy (Jan Gurba – Valentina Korpusova), 66-77

Korpusova V.M.
Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-66-77
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-66-77
UDK:[902:394.92](477+439)

ABSTRACT

This article is dedicated to the scientific dialogue of two archaeologists: Dr. J. Gurba (Poland) and Dr. V. Korpusova (Ukraine). This dialogue became possible because of the international exchange program between Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv and Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin. This program provided an opportunity for scientists to share scientific and cultural experience by direct human communication, to spread mutual understanding between people with common values, and provided an opportunity to establish professional contacts and meet new friends. The international exchange program is one of the many areas of work that the Department of Archeology and Museum Studies at Kyiv University is doing. With this program Dr. Gurba came for the internship in 1963-1964. He became a link between Polish and Ukrainian archaeologists, and facilitated the distribution of Ukrainian research achievements in Poland. Many Ukrainian scientists became his friends since then. One of those people is the author of this article, who worked at that time in the Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. This friendship, based on the common shared values and interests, continues through mail for more than half a century (since 1963).

This dialog helps to exchange scientific and cultural information, international publication of scientific articles, and spread of shared values. A special place in this dialogue is dedicated to the prominent scientists connected with the Department of Archeology and Museum Studies of KU: Professor L.M. Slavin (1906-1971), Dr. I.G. Shovkoplyas (1921-1997), and a graduate of KU Dr. V.P. Petrov (Domontovich) (1894-1969), who graduated from the University of Saint Volodymyr (as it was called then) in 1918. These people were my teachers, to whom I have dedicated multiple publications. Many Ukrainian publications of Polish archeologist Dr. Gurba are dedicated to them as well. He also published multiple articles about these people and other Ukrainian scientists and reviews of their work in Poland. Dr. Gurba always supports publication of my articles dedicated to Ukrainian archeologists V.P. Petrov, N.M. Kravchenko, M.I. Vyazmitina in Poland. Long lasting mail communication between Dr. Gurba and Dr. Korpusova is a good example of international exchange program outcomes.

Key words: archeology, educational exchange program, Ukraine, Poland, correspondence, Department of Archeology and Museology KNU.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Korpusova, V.M. 2019. The Dialogue of Two Archaeologists 1963-2020: scientific diplomacy (Jan Gurba – Valentina Korpusova) (Dialoh dvokh arkheolohiv 1963-2020: naukova dyplomatiia (Ian Hurba – Valentyna Korpusova). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 66-77 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Ber, V. 1945. Istorychni korinnya ukrayinsʹkoyi natsiyi. Chas. (Fyurt), №8, s.8-9. (in Ukrainian).
Ber, V. 1946. Arkheolohichna konferentsiya v Avhsburzi. Chas. (Fyurt), ch. 5(19), s. 4. (in Ukrainian).
Gurba, J.S. 2007. Profesor L.M. Slavin u polʹsʹkiy arkheolohiyi. Arkheolohiya, №1, s. 51-52. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2008 (Uporyadnyk, avtor vstupu, ta prymitok). Viktor Petrov (Domontovych) u dokumentakh ta spohadakh suchasnykiv. Ukrayinska biohrafistyka, Vyp. 4. – S. 306-339. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 1996. L.M. Slavin – direktor Instituta arkheologii Ukrainy. Mir Olvii. Kiev, s. 24-31. (in Russian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2001. V.P. Petrov yak istoriosof. Muzeyni chytannya. Materialy naukovoyi konferentsiyi, hrudenʹ 2000 r., m. Kyiv. s. 6-12. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2002a. Ob odnoy osobennosti khristianskogo pogrebalnogo obryada srednevekovogo naseleniya Vostochnogo Kryma. Sugdeya, Surozh, Soldayya v istorii i kulture Rusi – Ukrainy. Materialy nauchnoy konferentsii (16-22 sentyabrya 2002 g.). Kiyev-Sudak: Natsionalnyy zapovednik «Sofiya Kiyevskaya», s. 132-137. (in Russian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2002b. V. Petrov (Domontovych): etnohenetyka yak svoboda samovyyavlennya. Slovo i Chas, № 10 (502), S. 17-25. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2007. Lazar Moyseyovych Slavin – dyrektor Instytutu arkheolohiyi Akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny. Arkheolohiya, №1, s. 31-39. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2008. Iz ostannoho zhyttyepysu Viktora Platonovycha Petrova (Domontovycha): «Vin buv lyudynoyu poklykannya, a ne vyznannya». Ukrayinska biohrafistyka, Vyp. 4, s. 340-365. (in Ukrainian).
Korpusova, V.M. 2016. Ivan Havrylovych Shovkoplyas – lyudyna poklykannya. Ukrayinska biohrafistyka, Vyp. 13, s. 81-92. (in Ukrainian).
Petrov, V. 2013. Rozvidky. V 3 t. Uporyad., avtor peredmovy ta prymitok V. Bryukhovetsʹkyy. Kyiv: Tempora, 1703 s. (in Ukrainian).
Gurba, J. 2004. «Archeologiczne Listy» na 70-lecie Instytutu Archeologii NAN Ukrainy 1934-2004. Jerzy Libera і Anna Zakościelna (eds.) Instytut Archeologii UMCS w Lublinie, R. 21, Nr 1(60).
Gurba, J. 2005. Straty osobowe archeologii polskiej w czasie II wojny światowej (próba uzupełnień). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie – Sklodowskiej, Lublin-Polonia, Vol. LX, s. 257-264.
Gurba, J. 2008. Profesor Lazar M. Slawin w Polskiej archeologii. Archeologia Polski, t. LIII:, z. 1, s. 145-147.
Hensel, W. 1974. L’ethnogenesologie. Slavia Antiqua, t. ХХІ, s. 1-4.
Korpusowa, W. 1998. Pamieci Marii Wiazmitiny – ukrainskiego badacza Sarmatow I Scytow. Archeologia Polski Środkowowschodniej. ІІІ – Lublin – Chelm – Zamość, s. 310-312.
Lepecki, M. B. 1936. W blaskach wojny (wydanie II). Lwow – Warszawa.

External reviews: DOWNLOAD

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Archaeological Museums of Institutions of Higher Education of Ukraine: cultural and educational aspects of activity, 53-58

Moskalenko A.V.
National University of Culture and Arts of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-53-58
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-53-58
UDK: [902:069:378](477)

ABSTRACT

Archaeological  museums  of  higher  educational  institutions  are  not  a  new  phenomenon  at  the Ukrainian territory and their origins reach the beginning of the 19th century. However, their number has increased significantly by the present stage. The phenomenon that shifts from quantitative to qualitative, influencing, in addition to the educational and scientific process in the university space, the cultural processes of the modern urban environment, requires scientific understanding and explanation.

The article describes the main formation stages of archaeological museums at higher educational institutions on the territory of modern Ukraine. The author determines when and under what historical conditions the appearance of most university’s archaeological museums took place. The author thinks there were both objective and subjective premises and causes for this. The author conducts a comparative analysis of the territorial, cultural and chronological affiliation of archaeological collections that underline designated museums.

The author describes the main activities of university’s archaeological museums. The special attention is paid to the systematization of the current directions and ways of cultural and educational activities of these museums. The comparative analysis of the cultural and educational activities of these institutions with the similar work of other core museums is carried out.

The author comes to conclusions about the specificity, trends of the establishing and functioning of archaeological museums of higher educational institutions of Ukraine. Particular attention is paid to generalizing the specificity of the cultural and educational work and its correlation with other activity areas of these museums. Summarizing, author determines the role of university’s archaeological museums in creating of modern urban cultural space, in general, also indicates their place onto the urban cultural institutions system of archaeological profile, in particular.

Key words: an archaeological museum, institute of high education, cultural and educational activity, excursion, exhibition, archaeological club.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Moskalenko, A.V. 2019. The Archaeological Museums of Institutions of Higher Education of Ukraine: cultural and educational aspects of activity (Arkheolohichni muzei zakladiv vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy: kulturno-prosvitnytskyi aspekt diialnosti). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 53-58 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Arkheolohichnyi muzei [online]. Rezhym dostupu: http://museums.lnu.edu.ua/archeology/ [Data zvernennia 01.11. 2019]. (In Ukrainian).
Istoriia muzeiu. In: Muzei arkheolohii SNU imeni Lesi Ukrainky [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://eenu.edu.ua/uk/structure/muzey-arheologiyi-snu-imeni-lesi-ukrayinki [Data zvernennia 01.11. 2019]. (In Ukrainian).
Muzei arkheolohii universytetu. Istoriia [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://www.univer.kharkov.ua/ua/departments/history/museum/archaeology_and_ethnography_of_the_slobidska_ukraine [Data zvernennia 01.11. 2019] (In Ukrainian).
Kobal, V. 2017. Arkheolohichnyi muzei UzhNU im. profesora Eduarda Balahuri – dzherelo osvity ta nauky kraiu [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://www.uzhnu.edu.ua/uk/news/arheologichnij-muzej-uzhnu-im-profesora-eduarda-balaguri.htm [Data zvernennia 31.10.2019] (In Ukrainian).
Hurtok arkheolohii [online]. Rezhym dostupu: http://historiography.karazin.ua/gurtok-arheologii.html/ [Data zvernennia 01.11. 2019] (In Ukrainian).
Novyny. 21 veresnia 2019 roku. Karazinskyi universytet vkotre vziav uchast v aktsii “Nich nauky” [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://www.univer.kharkov.ua/ua/general/univer_today/news?news_id=9145/ [Data zvernennia 01.11. 2019] (In Ukrainian).
Lokatsiia “Tsikava arkheolohiia” na Misti Profesii u Lvovi [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://clio.lnu.edu.ua/news/lokatsiia-tsikava-arkheolohiia-na-misti-profesiy-u-l-vovi [Data zvernennia 31.10.2019] (In Ukrainian).
Pohoralskyi, Ya. 2007. Arkheolohichnyi muzei Lvivskoho universytetu – 40 rokiv z chasu vidnovlennia diialnosti. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia Lvivskoho universytetu, 10. Lviv. (In Ukrainian).
Samoilenko, I. 2014. Universytetski arkheolohichni zibrannia. Kulturolohichnyi visnyk Nyzhnoi Naddniprianshchyny, s. 30-34. (In Ukrainian).
Samoilenko, I. 2015. Polovi arkheolohichni kolektsii yak osnova muzeinoho zibrannia (na prykladi muzeiu Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu). Scriptorium nostrum, 1-2, s. 99-106. (In Ukrainian).
Samoilenko, L. 2016. Osvita v muzei ta muzeina osvita v istorii Kyivskoho universytetu. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, History, 4 (131), s. 53-61. (In Ukrainian).
Samoilenko, L.H. 2019. About the University Museum studies of Ukraine in general and the Archaeological Museum of Kyiv National University in particular. In: Terpylovskyi, R.V., Shydlovskyi, P.S. (eds.). International Scientific Conference «ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEOLOGY IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH» on the occasion of 75-th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology (October 24 - 25, 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine): Abstracts, Kyiv, p. 60-61.
Samoilenko, L., Shydlovskyi P., 2016. Mezhyrich settlement: What will be future of our past? (Mezhyritska stoianka: yake maibutnie v nashoho mynuloho? Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, History, 4 (131), s. 62-69. (In Ukrainian), http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223 .
Shydlovskyi, I.V. 2012. Istoriia muzeinoi spravy ta zoolohichnykh muzeiv universytetiv Ukrainy. Lviv: LNU im. Ivana Franka (In Ukrainian).
External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects
Implementation of the Specialty “Museum Studies, Monument Studies” at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 39-52

Ivanysko S.I., Shydlovskyi P.S., Synytsia Ye.V.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-39-52
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-39-52
UDK: [069:351.853:378](477.411)

ABSTRACT

Specialty 027 “Museum Studies, Monument Studies” programs have been launched in Taras Shevchenko National University at 2018, based on current educational requirements. Curricula were developed taking into account the practical experience of teachers, graduates and colleagues. When designing the educational program, the project teams proceeded from the fact that in the process of studying the student should:

• a) to acquire knowledge about the specific activities of museum institutions;
• b) to familiarize with the available examples, to study the experience of the leading museums of Ukraine and the world;
• c) to acquire practical skills in various forms of museum work.

A considerable number of classes take place in museum institutions, which allows students to acquire the necessary practical skills, be acquainted with the rather colourful range of equipment used in the field, and directly observe the use of various techniques of museum work. Despite the keen interest in admission to the Master’s degree program among alumni-bachelors of the Faculty of History of the University, as well as graduates of other higher education institutions, as evidenced by the statistics of applications for admission, one of the weaknesses of the educational program is the lack of complexity of groups. The number of students is less than half the licensed volume of recruitment, which is explained by the small number of budget places. However, not only the negative but also the positive aspects caused by the reformatting of the educational process due to the lack of complexity of the groups. The small number of students means that during the classroom, it is about the individual interaction of the teacher with the students.

Teachers of educational programs have practical experience in working in museums and heritage preservation institutions, maintain regular contacts with practitioners, and participate directly in the work of permanent and temporary advisory and expert bodies in the field of museums and protection of monuments. These conditions transform teachers into direct translators from the practical sphere into the educational field the latest trends in heritage protection and museum studies. An important aspect is also a kind of monitoring of the potential labour market and the existence of healthy lobbying links that contribute to the further employment of graduates.

Key words: Museology, Monument Studies, Education, institution of higher education, educational and scientific program.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Ivanysko S.I., Shydlovskyi P.S., Synytsia Ye.V. 2019. Implementation of the Specialty “Museum Studies, Monument Studies” at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Zaprovadzhennia spetsialnosti «Muzeieznavstvo, pamiatkoznavstvo» v Kyivskomu natsionalnomu universyteti imeni Tarasa Shevchenka). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 39-52 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 2016. History, 4 (131). Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/host/10.23.10.100/db/ftp/visnyk/istoriya_131_2016.pdf .
Dovidnyk kvalifikatsiinykh kharakterystyk profesii pratsivnykiv. 2000. Vyp. 81, «Kultura i mystetstvo». Rozdil 2. “Muzeii ta zaklady muzeinoho typu”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0168280-00 .
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu». 2014. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady, 2014, №37-38. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 .
Kruhlyi stil na temu «Kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy: doslidzhennia, muzeiefikatsiia, okhorona ta zberezhennia». 2016. Kyiv: Department of Archaeology and Museology of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.ua/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=302:kruhlyi-stil-na-temu-kulturna-spadshchyna-ukrayiny-doslidzhennia-muzeiefikatsiia-okhorona-ta-zberezhennia&catid=19&Itemid=117 .
Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia «Arkheolohiia ta muzeina sprava v systemi osvity ta nauky». 2019. Kyiv: Department of Archaeology and Museology of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.ua/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=373:konferentsiia-2019&catid=17&Itemid=101 .
MKMS pidpysalo memorandum pro spivpratsiu z istorychnym fakultetom KNU im. Tarasa Shevchenka, March 13, 2020. https://mkip.gov.ua/news/3629.html .
Natsionalnyi klasyfikator Ukrainy. 2005. Klasyfikator profesii DK 003:2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/vb375609-05 .
Natsionalnyi klasyfikator Ukrainy. 2010. Klasyfikator profesii DK 003:2010. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/va327609-10 .
Osvitno-naukova prohrama «Muzeieznavstvo, pam’iatkoznavstvo». Riven vyshchoi osvity: druhyi. 2018. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.ua/home/images/pdf_doc/Op_027_mag_den_2020.pdf .
Osvitno-profesiina prohrama «Muzeieznavstvo, pam’iatkoznavstvo». Riven vyshchoi osvity: pershyi. 2018. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.ua/home/images/pdf_doc/opys027_bakalavry_2018.pdf .
Okhorona pam’iatok. 2019. YouTube channel Paleoethnological Research: Center for Paleoethnological Research. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7Q74aWPLwfjpawhgFcbFqRbedVYoeQ3y .
Polozhennia pro orhanizatsiiu osvitnoho protsesu u Kyivskomu natsionalnomu universyteti imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2018. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://nmc.univ.kiev.ua/docs/Poloz_org_osv_proc-2018.pdf .
Polozhennia pro poriadok realizatsii studentamy Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka prava na vilnyi vybir navchalnykh dystsyplin. 2018. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://nmc.univ.kiev.ua/docs/Poriadok%20vyboru%20dyscyplin%20(03_12_2018).PDF .
Postanova Kabinetu ministriv Ukrainy «Pro zatverdzhennia pereliku haluzei znan i spetsialnostei, za yakymy zdiisniuietsia pidhotovka zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity». 2015. Kyiv: Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/266-2015-%D0%BF .
Samoilenko, L.H. 2006. Muzei Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka: istoriia, dosvid roboty, perspektyvy rozvytku. Visnyk Odeskoho istoryko-kraieznavchoho muzeiu, 3, July 2006. Odesa, s. 61-66. http://www.history.odessa.ua/publication3/stat11.htm .
Samoilenko, L.H. 2012. Sozdanie kafedry` arkheologii i muzeevedeniya v Kievskom universitete. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 9. Istoriia arkheolohii: doslidnyky ta naukovi tsentry. K.: ІA NANU, s. 228-234. http://www.vgosau.kiev.ua/load_period-sb/adiu_09.pdf.
Samoilenko, L.H. 2016. Osvita v muzei i muzeina osvita v istorii Kyivskoho universytetu (Education in Museum and Museum Education in the History of the University of Kyiv). Bulletin of Taras  Shevchenko  National University of Kyiv, History, 4 (131), s. 53-62. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/host/10.23.10.100/db/ftp/visnyk/istoriya_131_2016.pdf#page=53.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Introduction. Bifurcation point, 9-20

Shydlovskyi P.S.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-9-20
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-9-20

ABSTRACT

The time of compiling this collection was marked by several significant events, which deal both global problems and, in particular, our archaeological, monument and museum studies community. More than half of humanity has found itself in voluntary or forced isolation due to the spread of the COVID-19. Nevertheless, this isolation did not cause inaction in the field of education and science in Ukraine, and, under quarantine, we face the problems of further and eternal reforming of the system of domestic science and education. Specific challenges at the global and national levels make us think about the fate and place of spheres involved in the study and preservation of human heritage. In conditions of uncertainty about the future of large communities, world and European institutions, in the general economic crisis and recession, the humanistic principles of modern civilization and specific programs related to educating people to care for the environment and the achievements of previous generations should play a particularly important role.

Significant issues arise in the field of higher education because of attempts to subordinate the educational process to the “requirements of the labor market”. This approach is reflected in the neglect of basic knowledge and “real science”, narrowing the concept of universal education to the development of a set of useful skills that are beneficial to employers in the exploitation of the future employee. This state of domestic science leads to a decrease in the social significance of the scientific worldview and distrust of society and its “elite” to the modern scientific paradigm.

The modern world is at a bifurcation point - a critical breakdown of outdated control systems that can no longer meet the needs of modern human. Clumsy bureaucracies are ineffective due to the fact that they focus most of their activities on maintaining their own existence and reproduction and, in this case, quickly lose out to civil society initiatives. One such research initiative is VITA ANTIQUA, an independent edition funded without budgetary resources. The pages of the magazine constantly raise issues of preservation of archaeological and museum heritage, reveal topical issues of monument protection.

Key words: cultural heritage, higher education, science, bureaucracy, public organizations

Language: English/Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2019. Introduction. Bifurcation point. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 9-20.