Category: Без рубрики

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Anna Radchenko¹, Simon Rsdchenko ²
Archaeology on paper: scientific professional publications in Ukraine and whst is (not) happening to them
¹ PH “Akademperiodyka” of the NAS of Ukraine
²Museum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger
¹ORCID: 0000-0002-0276-6398
²ORCID: 0000-0003-2970-5373
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-3783-6277

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The paper examines the three most highly ranked periodical publishing bodies dealing with Ukraine's archaeological content — Arheologia, Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, and EMINAK. Focusing on academic papers as the main way to present research outcomes, it provides a scientometric study of these periodicals to examine processes in Ukrainian archaeology to the extent they are expressed in publications. The paper perceives scientometric research as a reliable way to spot internal and external trends of the journal, and compare them to their analogies in the publishing bodies abroad, tracing the directions for future modification and development.

We applied conventional and self-developed tools to perform a coherent study of Ukrainian journals, revealing trends and approaches in authorship, thematic choices, and titling creativity of published papers. These methods showed a coherence and fascination in material-based study and material publication of Ukrainian journals, especially compared to European ones. Moreover, a comparatively low level of titling creativity emphasizes the undertheorization of the data and an established tradition to focus on empirical work instead of the interpretational publication. In contrast to the European writing model, Ukrainian authors follow a fixational approach to presenting material instead of analytical and synthetic. In addition, the metadata are often selected in order to exclude external readers rather than include them, as European scholars aim to do.

This paper draws the connection between such state of the art, the low quantity of theoretical and methodological research in Ukraine, and the relatively low topicality of academic papers published by Ukrainian archaeologists in their domestic periodicals. We claim that the absence of consistent and rigorous theoretical work affects the overall level of scholarly publishing in Ukrainian archaeology and leads to an increase in the thematic and methodological gap between Ukrainian and European archaeology. Moreover, in our view, this is a symptom of social unawareness and passivity of Ukrainian archaeology as a discipline, which might lead to severe empiricism and problems for the field shortly. In the paper's final part, we provide some general reflections on the matter and advice on how Ukrainian archaeological academic journals can contribute to overcoming the current crisis.

Keywords: scientometric analysis, bibliometrics, peer-reviewed journal, citation, word frequency, science theory, archaeology.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Chechulina, I.O. 2025. Archaeology on paper: scientific professional publications in Ukraine and whst is (not) happening to them. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Bibliometriia: Leidenskyi manifest dlia naukometrii. 2017. Filosofska dumka, 6, 93-98 (in Ukrainian).

Velenteichyk, T.M., Radchenko, A.I., Mryglod, O.I. 2023. A Scientometric Study of “Science and Science of Science” Journal: to the 30th Anniversary of the Edition. Nauka naukozn, 3 (121), 5-40 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2023.03.005 

Zalizniak, L.L. 2019. Ukrainska arkheolohiia: stan i perspektyvy (subiektyvne vrazhennia pro obiektyvnyi stan). ADIU, 4. 388-395 (in Ukrainian).

Kotlyarevsky, Ya.V., Radchenko, A.I., Melnikov, O.V., Semenyuk, E.P. 2018. Strategic priorities in measuring the publication and publishing works in scholarly research activity. Sci. innov., 14 (5), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine14.05.005

Minakov, M.A., Radchenko, S.B. 2024. The structure of archaeological knowledge and the concept of archaeological culture: the perspective of actor-network theory. Arheologia, 4, 104-124. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2024.04.104

Palyenko, S.V. 2016. V.F. Henynh y formyrovanye kyevskoho tsentra teoretycheskoi arkheolohyy. Kratkie soobshchenyia Instytuta arkheolohyy 242, 232-243 (in Russian).

Radchenko, A., Radchenko, S. 2024. «Arheologia» of Ukraine: creativity, monopolization and scientometric analysis. Arheologia, in print (in Ukrainian).

Radchenko, S., Radchenko, A. 2024. Archaeology on paper: scientific publications in Ukraine and what is (not) happening to them. Abstracts. International Scientific Conference "Archaeology, museum and monument studies in education and research" (October 3-4, 2024, Kyiv, Ukraine, AMMS 2024), 42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14203344

Radchenko, A.I. 2018. “Notes of the Ukrainian Mineralogical Society”: History and Perspectives. Proc. Ukrainian Mineral. Society, 15, 19-28 (in Ukrainian).

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2018. How to assess how wide is an audience of a periodical. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 9, 73-82 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2018.09.073 

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2019. Monopolization of Section of Chemical and Biological Sciences of the NAS of Ukraine periodicals. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 10, 63-69 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2019.10.063 

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2020. Journals of NAS of Ukraine in physical, engineering and mathematical sciences: monopolization level. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 11, 51-58 (in Ukrainian).  https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2020.11.051 

Radchenko, А.I., Mryglod, O.I. 2019. “Mineralogical Journal (Ukraine)”: 40 Years of History. Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), 41 (1), 3-14 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.41.01.003 

González-Ruibal, A., ed., 2013. Reclaiming archaeology. Beyond the tropes of modernity. London: Routledge, 392 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068632  

Greenberg, R., Hamilakis, Y., 2023. Archaeology, coloniality and modernity: a response. Forum Kritische Archäologie, 12, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41380 

Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; de Rijcke, Sarah; Rafols, Ismael. 2015. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520 (7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a 

Radchenko, S. 2024. Are We Metamodern? The Structure of Today’s Archaeology from the Perspective of Cultural Studies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 57 (2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2025.2452292

Radchenko, S., Radchenko, A. 2024. Ukrainian archaeological theory outside of the garden wall. Presentation at the Nordic TAG 2024 Conference, Turku, March 6—8, 2024. URL: https://sites.utu.fi/nordictag2024/wp-content/uploads/sites/1259/2024/03/NordicTAG-2024-Abstract-book-UPDATED.pdf

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Yaroslav Volodarets-Urbanovych¹
Early Medieval Jewelry from the Kherson Local History Museum : stolen heritage
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-1560-3608

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The report presents information about a number of archaeological finds of early Middle Ages from funds and exposition of the Kherson Local History Museum. This jewellery entered the museum’s collection in different years. It was possible to author to get acquainted with these materials in 2018 and 2019. A part was published almost immediately, others later — during 2024 and 2025. Work on processing part of the collection was stopped by the global Covid-2019 pandemic. And on February 24, 2022, a full-scale invasion of russian troops began, including in the south of Ukraine, with the occupation of Kherson. In November 2022, during the robbery by the russian occupiers of the Kherson Local History Museum, a number of items (including jewellery of the early Middle Ages) were taken in an unknown direction. Their further fate is unknown.

All archaeological finds can be divided into four groups according to ethnocultural affiliation and general dating.

 

1. Аnthropomorphic pendant from «Oleshkovsky Pіski» (Fig. 2; 3). Archaeological find belongs to the circle of «Black Sea-Caucasian» pendants of Alans or Bulgarians, it under discussion could be dated to the 4th— 7thcc. It entered the collection of Viktor Goshkevich (the founder and funder of the museum) back in 1900 or 1905.
2. Finds of strap adornments by «Heraldic» style (second half of the 6th— 7thcc.) from three points — Novooleksiivka, Novochornomor’ia and Kalanchak (Fig. 4—7), in total of 12 archaeological finds. This jewellery entered the museum’s collection in the 1960s and early 1970s, thanks to the works of Israel Ratner (an employee-archaeologist of the museum).
3. Buckle of early Byzantine time from Heroiske village (Fig. 8). This find belongs to the circle of very famous produces of the «Syracuse» type. Similar buckles date back to the last quarter of the 6th— 7thcc. This jewel also entered the museum’s collection thanks to the works of Israel Ratner.
4. Jewellery findings from Pravi Solontsi Hoard, which belongs to the assemblages of the Martynivka circle. The complex comprises 20 whole and fragmented metal items and 1 bead of nontranslucent glass (Fig. 9; 10). The items existed in starting from the end of the 6th/ turn of the 6th—7th cc. to the middle / third quarter of the 7th c.

The report presents the most complete information about those finds that have been processed and data about which may be lost. It should be hoped that attracting the attention of the world public and the work of the relevant services will be able to return the stolen heritage of Ukraine during the full-scale invasion, including from the collection of the Kherson Local History Museum.

Keywords: The Kherson Local History Museum, Early Middle Ages, Slavs, nomads, jewelry.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Volodarets-Urbanovych Y.V. 2025. Early Medieval Jewelry from the Kherson Local History Museum : stolen heritage. VITA ANTIQUA,16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

References:

Aibabin, A. I. 1990. Khronologiia mogilnikov Kryma pozdnerimskogo i rannesrednevekovogo vremeni. Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii, I, s. 3-86, 175-241.

Veimarn, E. V., Aibabin, A. I. 1993. Skalistinskii mogilnik. Kiev: Naukova dumka.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2014. Pronyzky epokhy rannoho serednovichchia zi slov’ianskykh pam’iatok pivdnia Skhidnoi Yevropy. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 2 (13), s. 35-49.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2024. Vizantiiska priazhka typu «Syrakuzy» iz Heroiskoho yak marker kulturnykh kontaktiv. Skhodoznavstvo, 94, s. 3-28. https://doi.org/10.15407/skhodoznavstvo2024.94.003.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2025. Znakhidky detalei reminnykh ozdob «heraldychnoho» stylia rannoho serednovichchia iz kolektsii Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu. Arkheolohiia, 3, s. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2025.03.052.

Volodarets-Urbanovich, IA. V., Ganoshchenko, V. V. 2020. Antropomorfnaia podveska iz sobraniia Khersonskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia. Prinosi kiem Bielgarskata arkheologiia, X, s. 5-22.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1996a. Detali remennoi garnitury. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 22-36.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1996b. Datirovka dneprovskikh kladov pervoi gruppy metodom sinkhronizatsii s drevnostiami drugikh territorii. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. (red.). Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 58-95.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1999. V-obraznye priazhki, izgotovlennye vmeste s shchitovidnoi oboimoi. V: Ivanov, A. G. (red.). Permskii mir v rannem srednevekove. Archaeologia Permica, I. Izhevsk: Udmurtskii in-t istorii, iaz. i lit. UrO RAN, s. 160-209.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 2001. Evoliutsiia vostochnoevropeiskikh psevdopriazhek. V: Stashenkov, D. A. (red.). Kultury Evraziiskikh stepei vtoroi poloviny I tysiacheletiia n. e. 2. Samara, s. 31-86.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 2004. Srednedneprovskie ingumatsii vtoroi poloviny V—VI v. V: Goriunova, V. M., Shcheglova, O. A. (red.). Kulturnye transformatsii i vzaimovliianiia v Dneprovskom regione na iskhode rimskogo vremeni i v rannem Srednevekove. Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, s. 208-220.

Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. 1996. Dneprovskoe Levoberezhe na zare srednevekovia: dinamika istoriko-kulturnykh protsessov i klady. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 140-148.

Hanoshchenko, V. V., Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2019. Skarb kola Martynivky z Pravykh Solontsiv Khersonskoi oblasti. Arkheolohiia ta davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 32 (3), s. 126-150.

Daskalov, M. 2012. Kolani i kolanni ukrasi ot VI—VII vek (ot dneshna Bulgaria i sasednite zemi). Sofia: Craft House Bulgaria.

Dzneladze, O. 2024. Yuvelirni prykrasy, vkradeni z Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 2 (51), s. 263-273. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2024.02.16.

Zasetskaia, I. P., Kazanskii, M. M., Akhmedov, I. R., Minasian, R. S. 2007. Morskoi Chulek. Pogrebeniia znati iz Priazovia i ikh mesto v istorii plemen Severnogo Prichernomoria v postgunnskuiu epokhu. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha.

Kazanskii, M. M. 2014. Arkheologicheskaia situatsiia v Srednem Podneprove v VII v. V: Oblomskii, A. M. (red.). Problemy vzaimodeistviia naseleniia Vostochnoi Evropy v epokhu Velikogo pereseleniia narodov. Ranneslavianskii mir, 15. Moskva, s. 138-177.

Kazanskii, M. M. 2020. Drevnosti stepnykh kochevnikov postgunskogo vremeni (seredina V — seredina VI v.) v Vostochnoi Evrope. Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii, XXV, s. 90-167.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 1979. Poiasnye nabory Evrazii IV—IX vv. Priazhki. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, E1-02. Moskva: Nauka.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 1983. Antropomorfnye amulety VI—IX vv. na Severnom Kavkaze. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii, 176, s. 43-50.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 2000. Kompiuternaia obrabotka massovogo arkheologicheskogo materiala iz rannesrednevekovykh pamiatnikov Evrazii. Pushchino: ONTI PNTS RAN.

Komar, A. V. 2006. Pereshchepinskii kompleks v kontekste osnovnykh problem istorii i kultury kochevnikov Vostochnoi Evropy VII — nachala VIII v. Stepi Evropy v epokhu srednevekovia, 5: Khazarskoe vremia, s. 7-244, 413-432.

Komar, A. V. 2013. Kochevniki vostochnoevropeiskikh stepei vtoroi poloviny VI — pervoi poloviny VIII v. V: Dosymbaeva, A., Zholdasbekov, M. (red.). Zapadnyi Tiurkskii kaganat. Atlas. Astana: «Service Press», s. 671-821.

Kostenko, A. 2019. Izrail Ratner. Zhyve slovo chasovi nepidvladne. Kherson.

Musiiko, V. V. 2023. Peredmova. V: Honcharova, O. S. (red.). Nenaukovi zapysky: spohady spivrobitnykiv Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu pro okupatsiiu mista. Mykolaiv, s. 4-8.

Oblomskii, A. M., Rodinkova, V. E. 2014. Etnokulturnyi perelom v Podneprove v VII v. n. e. Khronologiia sobytii. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii, 235, s. 381-404.

Ratner, I. D. 1984. Dovidnyk z arkheolohii Ukrainy. Khersonska oblast. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Ratner, I. D., Kostiuk, L. I. 1989. Drevnosti Khersonshchiny. Simferopol: Tavriia.

Rashev, R. 2000. Prabalgarite prez V—VII vek. V. Tarnovo: Faber.

Rodinkova, V. E. 2003. Kulturnye sviazi naseleniia Srednego Podneprovia v VII v. (po materialam zhenskogo ubora). Dissertatsiia k. i. n.

Rodinkova, V. E. 2012. Novaia nakhodka vizantiiskogo serebrianogo sosuda s kleimom v Vostochnoi Evrope. Rossiiskaia arkheologiia, 4, s. 151-158.

Rodinkova, V. E., Sedin, A. A. 2004. Braslety Nikodimovskogo gorodishcha. V: Makarov, N. A., Chernetsov, A. V., Lopatin, N. V. (red.). Vostochnaia Evropa v Srednevekove: K 80-letiiu Valentina Vasilevicha Sedova. Moskva: Nauka, s. 234-246.

Sikoza, D., Dzneladze, O., Symonenko, O. 2025. Dachi — kompleks doby Velykoho Pereselennia Narodiv z Khersonshchyny. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 54 (2), s. 154—160. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2025.02.10.

Skyba, A. V. 2016. Poiasni nabory heraldychnoho styliu u slov’ian. Kyiv: Instytut arkheolohii NANU.

Skyba, A. V., Khardaiev, V. M. 2017. Poiasni harnitury z kochivnytskykh kompleksiv v kolektsii Muzeiu istorychnykh koshtovnostei Ukrainy (filialu Natsionalnoho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy). V: Skyba, A. V., Horbanenko, S. A. (red.). Yevropeiska arkheolohiia I tysiacholittia n. e.: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats na chest Liany Vasylivny Vakulenko. Kyiv, s. 221-236.

Traykova, L. A. 2017. Kolanat yuzhno ot dolen Dunav — kraya na ІІІ — nachaloto na VІІ v. Sofia.

Shelov, D. B. 1984. Antropomorfnyi amulet iz Tanaisa. V: Meliukova, A. I., Moshkova, M. G., Petrenko, V. G. (red.). Drevnosti Evrazii v skifo-sarmatskoe vremia. Sbornik statei. Moskva: Nauka, s. 241-246.

Schulze-Dörrlamm, M. 2002. Byzantinische Gürtelschnallen und Gürtelbeschläge im Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum. I: Die Schnallen ohne Beschläg, mit Laschenbeschläg und mit festem Beschläg des 5.—7. Jahrhunderts. Kataloge Vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Altertümer, 30. Mainz.

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Sofia Syvuk¹
Roman Metal Tableware in the Chernyakhiv Culture of Ukraine : a historiographical overview
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0009-0001-2945-3623

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The article presents an attempt at a comprehensive analysis of the history of studying Roman metal vessels from sites of the Chernyakhiv culture within the territory of Ukraine. Particular attention is devoted to the clarification of the terminological framework, the definition and characterization of the main stages in the accumulation of the source base, as well as to the identification of the specific features of its formation and the dynamics of artifact discovery.

Special attention is given to the analysis of chronological aspects, the examination of the historical context, and the discussion of the functional purpose of Roman metal vessels in the barbarian milieu. In particular, the so-called “princely burials” are analyzed as examples illustrating the formation of the “drinking set” characteristic of the Chernyakhiv culture, which reflects processes of adaptation and reinterpretation of Roman traditions within the material culture of the barbarian societies of the Northern Black Sea region.

The paper also presents an up-to-date list of known examples of Roman metal vessels associated with the Chernyakhiv culture, mentioned in the works of both Ukrainian and foreign researchers. The conclusion analyzes the current state of research, identifies the main trends in the development of scholarly approaches, and outlines the prospects for further studies on this topic.

Keywords: Roman import, metal utensils, late Roman period, Chernyakhiv culture, historiography.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Syvuk, S.O. 2025. Roman Metal Tableware in the Chernyakhiv Culture of Ukraine : a historiographical overview. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Braichevskyi, M. 1968. Istoriia vyvchennia cherniakhivskoi kultury. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukrainskii RSR, 1, s. 213—238.

Hereta, I. 1976. Zvit pro arkheolohichni doslidzhennia u Chernelevi-Ruskomu v 1976 r.  Naukovyi arkhiv IA NANU, 1976/51.

Hereta, I. 1994. Zvit pro arkheolohichni doslidzhennia u Chernelevi-Ruskomu v 1994 r.  Naukovyi arkhiv IA NANU, 1994/90.

Gereta, I. 2013.Chernelevo-Ruskyi mohylnyk / upor. V.S. Tylishchak. OIUM, 3, Kyiv, Ternopil: TzOV “Terno-hraf”.

Levada, M. 2003. Mohylnyk Cherepashyntsi: sproba arkhivnoi rekonstruktsii doslidzhen arkheolohichnoi pamiatky. Pamiatky Ukrainy,  4, s. 12–19. 

Mahomedov, B. 2010. Znakhidky predmetiv rymskoho importu z metalu na cherniakhivskykh pamiatkakh Ukrainy. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy,  2, s. 174-182.

Mahomedov, B. 2003. Potoibichnyi benket u pokhovalnomu obriadi cherniakhivskoi kultury. Starozhytnosti I tysiacholittia nashoi ery na terytorii Ukrainy, s. 83—88.

Mahomedov, B. 1997. Pokhovalni sporudy yak oznaka sotsialnoho statusu v cherniakhivskomu suspilstvi. Problemy pokhodzhennia ta istorychnoho rozvytku slovian, s. 79–85.

Mahomedov, B. 1992. Velyka Snitynka 2 — poselennia hrebinnykiv III—IV st. n. e. Starodavnie vyrobnytstvo na terytorii Ukrainy, s. 94–116.

Mahomedov, B., Levada, M. 1993. Rozkopky cherniakhivskoho mohylnyka v s. Petrykivtsi. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, s. 80–81. 

Nadvirniak O., Pohorilets O. 2014. Novi znakhidky bronzovykh kazaniv typu Hemmor na Podilli. Cherniakhivska kultura: do 120-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia V.P. Petrova. OIUM, 4, s. 151–155.

Onyshchuk, Y. 2010.  Provintsiino-rymski kulturni vplyvy ta yikh rol v etnichnii istorii Volyno-Podilskoho pohranychchia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, s. 152–159. 

Petrauskas O., Hopkalo, O., Horbanenko, S. 2016. Vstup.   Cherniakhivska kultura: do 85-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia I. S. Vynokura, Ouim, 5, s. 7—10.

Petrauskas, O., Koval, O., Pohorilets, O., Nadvirniak, O. 2020. Arkheolohichni rozvidky z veryfikatsii mistseznakhodzhen rymskykh importiv na ob`iektakh cherniakhivskoi kultury Pivdennoho Pobuzhzhia (roboty 2014 r). DIKZ «Mezhybizh». Arkheolohichni chytannia. Materialy 2016–­2020 rr., 1– 2, s. 84-88.

Petrauskas, O., Nadvirniak, O., Pohorilets, O., 2023. Kazanky typu Khemmoor z terytorii Ukrainy (kataloh). Oium, 7, Kyiv-Khmelnytskyi: IA NAN Ukrainy

Syvuk, S. 2024. Istoriia vyvchennia rymskykh importiv cherniakhivskoi kultury terytorii Ukrainy: stan rozrobky temy. V: Shydlovskyi, P. S. (red.). Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia «Arkheolohiia, muzeieznavstvo ta pamiatkoznavstvo v systemi osvity ta nauky», s. 37-38.

Symonovych, E. 1980. «Kniazivski» pokhovannia cherniakhivskoi kultury. Tez. dop. V Podilskoi istoryko-kraieznavchoi konferentsii, s. 128–130.

Strotsen, B. 2008. Cherniakhivska kultura Zakhidnoho Podillia. Ternopil: Aston.  

Shchepachenko, V. 2024. Sotsialno ekonomichnyi rozvytok naselennia piznorymskoho chasu – pochatku doby Velykoho pereselennia narodiv na terytorii Ukrainy: za materialamy sklianoho posudu cherniakhivskoi kultury. Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia stupenia doktora filosofii za spetsialnistiu 032 – Istoriia ta arkheolohiia. KhNU im. V.N. Karazina MON Ukrainy.  

Varachyova, K. 2011. Mesto steklyannyh i glinyanyh kubkov v «servize» pogrebenij na mogilnikah chernyahovskoj kultury dnepro-doneckoj lesostepi. Oium, 1, s 61–65.

Gereta, I. 1989. Novye mogilniki Chernyahovskoj kultury Zapadnoj Podolii i velbarskaya kultura, Kul. wielb., s. 283-297.

Gopkalo, O., Milashevskij, O. 2017. O soderzhanii rannego etapa kulturi Chernyahov-Sintana-De-Muresh.  Rannij zheleznyj vek ot rubezha er do serediny I tys. n.e. Dinamika osvoeniya kulturnogo prostranstva, s. 44–46.

Gopkalo, O. 2011. Otnositelnaya hronologiya muzhskih pogrebenij chernyahovskoj kultury. K postanovke problemy. Oium, 1, s. 66–96.

Gopkalo, O., Tilishak, V. 2010. Rimskie importy iz metalla na mogilnike Cherneliv-Russkij. Germania-Sarmatia, 2, s. 78-95.

Gorohovskij, E. 1988. Hronologiya chernyahovskih mogilnikov Lesostepnoj Ukrainy. Trudy V Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa arheologov-slavistov, 4, s. 34-46.

Kravchenko, N. 1987. O metodike sociologicheskogo analiza pogrebalnogo obryada chernyahovskoj kultury. Issledovanie socialno-istoricheskih problem v arheologii, s. 209–227.

Kravchenko, N. 1967. Kosanovskij mogilnik (za materialami raskopok V.P. Petrova i N.M. Kravchenko. MIA. 139, s. 77–135.

Kropotkin, V. 1967. Ekonomicheskie svyazi Vostochnoj Evropy v I tysyacheletii nashej ery. AN SSSR, In-t arheologii. M.: Nauka.

Kropotkin, V. 1970. Rimskie importnye izdeliya v Vostochnoj Evrope (II v. do n.e. - V v. n.e.). M.: Nauka, 222 s.

Kuharenko, Y. 1980. Mogilnik Brest-Trishin. Moskva: Nauka.  

Magomedov, B.  2001. Chernyahovskaya kultura. Problema etnosa. Lublin: UMCS. Monumenta Studia Gothica,1, 276 s.

Nikulice, I., Rikman, E. 1973. Mogilnik Hanska—Luteriya pervyh stoletij nashej ery. Kratkie soobsheniya Instituta arheologii, 133, s. 116—123.

Pucko, V. 1984. Serebryanye kuvshiny iz Zhigajlovki. Vesnik drevnej istorii, 4, s. 77–89.

Tretyakov, P. 1966. Finno-ugry, balty i slavyane na Dnepre i Volge. Leningrad: Nauka.

Petrauskas, O., Syvolap, M. 2022. The Momstrous  (Monstruoso) Fibula from the Dnipro River region. Lietuvos Archeologija, 48, p. 265–284.

Wielowajski, J. 1988. Studies of Roman metal vessels during the last decade (1976–1985). Archaeologia Polona, 27, p. 15-67.

Bemmann, J. 2014. Mitteldeutschland und das Gallische Sonderreich 260-274: Eine liebgewonnene These auf dem Prüfstand. Kölner Jahrbuch, 47, S. 179–213. 

Bienert, B. 2007. Die römischen Bronzegefäße im Rheinischen  Landesmuseum Trier. Trierer Zeitschrift, 31. Trier: Rheinisches Landes museum.

Bierbrauer, V. 1989. Ostgermanische oberschichtgräber der römischen Keiserzeit und des frühen Mittelalters. Archeologia Baltica, 8, S. 38–106.

Eggers, H. 1951. Der römische Import im freien Germanien. Atlas der Urgeschichte, 1, Hamburg: Hamburgisches Museum für Völkerkunde und Vorgeschichte. 

Eggers, H. 1955. Zur absoluten Chronologie der römischen Kaiserzeit im Freien Germanien. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 2, S. 196-244.

Kokowski, A. 2001. Ein sogenanntes «Fürstengrab» von Rudka in Wolhynien (Seine Bedeutung für die Rekonstruktion des Bildes der germanischen Eliten im späten Altertum). In: Storgaard, B. (ed.). Military Aspects of the aristocracy in Barbaricum in the Roman and Early Migration. Publications from The National Museum Studies in Archaeology & History, 5, S. 41-53.

Kokowski, A. 2004. Die Kontakte zwischen der Masłomęcz Gruppe und dem Mitteldonauraum aufgrund der Verbreitung ausgewählter Importe. In: Friesinger, H., Stuppner, A. (eds.). Zen trum und Peripherie — Gesellschaftliche Phänomene in der Frühge schichte. Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission, 57, Wienn, S. 177-194.

Levada, M. 2018. Zwei „Bestattungen” vom Gräberfeld Hansca-Lutărie. Studia Barbarica. Profesorowi Adrzejowi Kokowskiemu w 65. rcznicę rodzin, 2, S. 185—204.

Magomedov, B. 2016. Das Fundspektrum römischer Metallsachgüter in der Černjachov-Kultur auf dem Gebiet der Ukraine. In: Voß, H.-U., Müller-Scheeßel, N. (eds.). Archäologie zwischen Römern und Barbaren. Zur Datierung und Verbreitung römischer Metallarbeiten des 2. und 3. Jhs. n. Chr. im Reich und im Barbaricum. Frankfurt am Main: R. Habelt, S. 861-870.

Petersen, E. 1941. Ein reicher gepidischer Grabfund aus Volhynien. Gothiskandza, 3, S. 39-52.

Petrauskas, O. 2021. Neue Funde von Hemmoorer Eimern zwischen Südlichem Bug und Dnister. Zur Typologie und Chronologie. V:  E.Sava et al. Die Chronologie der vorrömischen Eisen- und frühen Kaiserzeit in Mittel- und Südosteuropa: Probleme und Perspektiven: Humboldt-Kolleg: Chronologie in den archäologischen Forschungen, Chişinău, Chişinău-Berlin, S. 233-250.

Petrauskas, O., Didenko, S. 2022. Ein Grab mit Hemmoorer Eimer bei Poberežne, Oblast Winnyzja, in der ukrainischen Podillja. Germania, 100, S. 151-198.

 Voss, H.-U., Geisler, H., Laser, R.  1994.Corpus der römischen Funde im europäischen Barbaricum. Deutschland. Band 1, Bundesländer Brandenburg und Berlin. Bonn : R. Habelt.

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Iryna Chechulina¹
The Interaction of Metal and Ceramic Ware in Ancient Greek Culture: Technology, Style and Market Aspects
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-3783-6277

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The interaction between ancient Greek metal vessels and Greek ceramic ware is an important aspect of the study of ancient arts and crafts. The metal vases made of bronze, silver and gold produced by ancient Greek craftsmen were not only distinguished by their high craftsmanship, but also had a significant impact on the development of ceramic tableware. The phenomenon of potters imitating Torevtic wares is known not only in Greece, but also in a broader intercultural context, particularly in the Islamic world and China.

Metal vases often served as models for ceramic wares. Potters sought to reproduce the shapes, proportions, and decorative elements of metal vessels in their clay analogues. This was manifested in the use of similar contours and structural elements, for example, in the design of handles, bases and necks of the vessels.

The stylistic elements of metal vases, such as ornaments and motifs, are reflected in the paintings of ceramic ware. The delicate geometric patterns and floral motifs that adorned metal wares were adapted to the technique of ceramic painting. The potters tried to convey the aesthetic value and complexity of metal products through their wares, thus developing new styles and techniques of painting.

The development of technologies and methods for the production of metal vases stimulated technical progress in the manufacture of ceramic ware. The adoption of surface treatment techniques, such as polishing, imitation engraving or the use of fluting, allowed potters to create ware that imitated the shine of metal products.

The socio-economic factor played an important role in this process. Metal vessels were a luxury item available only to the elite, while ceramic analogues allowed a wider audience to join the visual culture of elite objects. Thanks to active trade, Greek ceramics imitating metal spread far beyond Greece, reaching the Northern Black Sea region, Italy, and the Middle East.

Although the main influence was from metal to ceramics, there are cases of the reverse process. Popular ceramic shapes were sometimes reproduced in metal, indicating the interdependence of different craft traditions.

Thus, the interplay between metal vases and ceramic tableware in Ancient Greece is an example of the integration of different craft traditions, which contributed to the development of material culture and art. This process reflects the diversity of the ancient Greek society, where different crafts and artistic trends interacted and mutually enriched, creating unique works that still impress with their perfection and artistic value.

Keywords: ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Chechulina, I.O. 2025. The Interaction of Metal and Ceramic Ware in Ancient Greek Culture: Technology, Style and Market Aspects. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Andrewes, A., 1991. Greek society. London: Penguin Books.

Boardman, J., 1979. The Athenian pottery trade. The Classical period. Expedition 21, 4, 33-39.

Boardman, J., 1988. Trade in greek decoration pottery. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 7.1, 27-33.

Chechulina, I., 2024. From Athens to Olbia Pontica: the Artistry of Black-Glazed ware. Kyiv: IA NANU.

Coşkun, G., 2011. Achaemenid bowls from Seyitömer Höyük. Olba, 19, 57-79.

Davis, D.L., 2009. Commercial Navigation in the Greek and Roman world. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin.

Furtwängler, A., 1885. Beschreibung der Vasensammlung im Antiquarium. Berlin: Antikensamlung.

Gill, D., 1991. Pots and trade: spacefillers or objects d'art? The Journal of Hellenistic studies, 111, 29-47.

Gill, D., Vickers, M., 1990. Reflected Glory: pottery and precious metal in classical Greece. Jahrbuch des deutschen Archäologisches Instituts, 105, 1-30.

Hayes, J., 1984. Greek and Italian Black-Gloss Wares and Related Wares in the Royal Ontario Museum. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.

Kaba, H., 2022. Comparing the Metal Vessel Acquisition Patterns and Trends of the Thracian and Cypriot Elite during the Classical Period. In: Delev, P. (ed.). Ancient Thrace: Myth and Reality. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Thracology, 1, 191-206.

Kotitsa, Z., 2012. Metal-coated pottery in Macedonia in Late Classical and Hellenistic period. In: Drougou, S, Touratsoglou, I. (Hrsg.), Topics on Hellenistic pottery in ancient Macedonia, 108-125.

Krauskopf, I., 1984. Terrakotta-imitationen der bronzekannen der form Beazley VI in Athen, Westgriechenland und Etrurien. In: Brijder, H.A. (ed.). Ancient Greek and Related Pottery. Proceedings of the International Vase Symposium. Amsterdam: Allard Pierson Museum, p. 83-87.

MacDonald, B.R., 1981. The Emigration of Potters from Athens in the Late Fifth Century B. C. and Its Effect on the Attic Pottery Industry. American Journal of Archaeology, 85. 2, 159-168.

Moller, A., 2008. Classical Greece: Distribution. In: Scheidel, W. (ed.). The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morel, J.-P., 1994. Céramique campanienne: Les formes. Rome: Ecole France.

Mozolevskyi, B.M., 1979. Tovsta Mohyla. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian).

Polyn, S.V., 1992. Ot Skyfyy k Sarmatyy. Kyiv: NANU. (in Russian).

Shefton, B., 1998. Metal and Clay: Prototype and Re-creation. Zoffany's "Tribuna" and Lessons from the Malacena Fabric of Hellenistic Volterra (Calyx-krater, Stamnos, Situla and the Achaemenid Rhython). Revue des Etudes Anciennes, 100-3-4, 619-662.

Sideris, A., 2015. Theseus in Thrace: The Silver Lining on the Clouds of the Athenian-Thracian Relations in the 5th Century BC. Sofia: Thrace Foundation.

Sideris, A., 2024. The Vratsa Situla and the Spread of the Palmette Motif. The Apogee of the Triballian Dynasty: The Triballoi and their Neighbours in the Classical and Early Hellenistic Times. Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Serdicensis, Supplementum VII, 49-69.

Skory, S., Khokhorovsky, Y. 2018. Bolshoi Ryzhanovsky Mound. Kyiv: Oleg Filyuk Publisher (in Russian).

Sparkes, B., 1977. Quintain and the Talcott class. Antike Kunst 20.1, 8-25.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013a. Antychne torhivelne sudno «Zmiinyi-Patrokl» (sklad produktsii). Archeologia, 3, 69-85.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013b. Pidvodno-arkheolohichne doslidzhennia antychnoho torhivelnoho sudna poblyzu o. Zmiinyi u Chornomu mori (polovyi sezon 2011 r.). Archeologia, 2, 64-77.

Themelis, P., Touratsoglou, G., 1997. Οι Ταφοι του Δερβενιου (Oi Tafoi toy Derbenioy). Athens.

Vickers, M., 1985. Artful crafts: the influence of metalwork on Athenian painted pottery. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 108-128.

Vickers, M., 2002. Potty prices. Ad Familiares 23, 9-10.

Vickers, M., 2010. Silver, horses and pots. In: Metzler, D. (ed.). Massadifiori. Essays presented to Herbert Hoffmann on his 80th birthday, 351-67.

Zimmermann, N. 1998. Beziehungen zwischen Ton- und Metallgefäßen spätklassischer und frühhellenistischer Zeit. Internationale Archäologie, 20. Leidorf: Rahden/Westf.

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Iryna Chechulina¹
The Interaction of Metal and Ceramic Ware in Ancient Greek Culture: Technology, Style and Market Aspects
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-3783-6277

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The interaction between ancient Greek metal vessels and Greek ceramic ware is an important aspect of the study of ancient arts and crafts. The metal vases made of bronze, silver and gold produced by ancient Greek craftsmen were not only distinguished by their high craftsmanship, but also had a significant impact on the development of ceramic tableware. The phenomenon of potters imitating Torevtic wares is known not only in Greece, but also in a broader intercultural context, particularly in the Islamic world and China.

Metal vases often served as models for ceramic wares. Potters sought to reproduce the shapes, proportions, and decorative elements of metal vessels in their clay analogues. This was manifested in the use of similar contours and structural elements, for example, in the design of handles, bases and necks of the vessels.

The stylistic elements of metal vases, such as ornaments and motifs, are reflected in the paintings of ceramic ware. The delicate geometric patterns and floral motifs that adorned metal wares were adapted to the technique of ceramic painting. The potters tried to convey the aesthetic value and complexity of metal products through their wares, thus developing new styles and techniques of painting.

The development of technologies and methods for the production of metal vases stimulated technical progress in the manufacture of ceramic ware. The adoption of surface treatment techniques, such as polishing, imitation engraving or the use of fluting, allowed potters to create ware that imitated the shine of metal products.

The socio-economic factor played an important role in this process. Metal vessels were a luxury item available only to the elite, while ceramic analogues allowed a wider audience to join the visual culture of elite objects. Thanks to active trade, Greek ceramics imitating metal spread far beyond Greece, reaching the Northern Black Sea region, Italy, and the Middle East.

Although the main influence was from metal to ceramics, there are cases of the reverse process. Popular ceramic shapes were sometimes reproduced in metal, indicating the interdependence of different craft traditions.

Thus, the interplay between metal vases and ceramic tableware in Ancient Greece is an example of the integration of different craft traditions, which contributed to the development of material culture and art. This process reflects the diversity of the ancient Greek society, where different crafts and artistic trends interacted and mutually enriched, creating unique works that still impress with their perfection and artistic value.

Keywords: ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Chechulina, I.O. 2025. ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Andrewes, A., 1991. Greek society. London: Penguin Books.

Boardman, J., 1979. The Athenian pottery trade. The Classical period. Expedition 21, 4, 33-39.

Boardman, J., 1988. Trade in greek decoration pottery. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 7.1, 27-33.

Chechulina, I., 2024. From Athens to Olbia Pontica: the Artistry of Black-Glazed ware. Kyiv: IA NANU.

Coşkun, G., 2011. Achaemenid bowls from Seyitömer Höyük. Olba, 19, 57-79.

Davis, D.L., 2009. Commercial Navigation in the Greek and Roman world. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin.

Furtwängler, A., 1885. Beschreibung der Vasensammlung im Antiquarium. Berlin: Antikensamlung.

Gill, D., 1991. Pots and trade: spacefillers or objects d'art? The Journal of Hellenistic studies, 111, 29-47.

Gill, D., Vickers, M., 1990. Reflected Glory: pottery and precious metal in classical Greece. Jahrbuch des deutschen Archäologisches Instituts, 105, 1-30.

Hayes, J., 1984. Greek and Italian Black-Gloss Wares and Related Wares in the Royal Ontario Museum. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.

Kaba, H., 2022. Comparing the Metal Vessel Acquisition Patterns and Trends of the Thracian and Cypriot Elite during the Classical Period. In: Delev, P. (ed.). Ancient Thrace: Myth and Reality. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Thracology, 1, 191-206.

Kotitsa, Z., 2012. Metal-coated pottery in Macedonia in Late Classical and Hellenistic period. In: Drougou, S, Touratsoglou, I. (Hrsg.), Topics on Hellenistic pottery in ancient Macedonia, 108-125.

Krauskopf, I., 1984. Terrakotta-imitationen der bronzekannen der form Beazley VI in Athen, Westgriechenland und Etrurien. In: Brijder, H.A. (ed.). Ancient Greek and Related Pottery. Proceedings of the International Vase Symposium. Amsterdam: Allard Pierson Museum, p. 83-87.

MacDonald, B.R., 1981. The Emigration of Potters from Athens in the Late Fifth Century B. C. and Its Effect on the Attic Pottery Industry. American Journal of Archaeology, 85. 2, 159-168.

Moller, A., 2008. Classical Greece: Distribution. In: Scheidel, W. (ed.). The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morel, J.-P., 1994. Céramique campanienne: Les formes. Rome: Ecole France.

Mozolevskyi, B.M., 1979. Tovsta Mohyla. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian).

Polyn, S.V., 1992. Ot Skyfyy k Sarmatyy. Kyiv: NANU. (in Russian).

Shefton, B., 1998. Metal and Clay: Prototype and Re-creation. Zoffany's "Tribuna" and Lessons from the Malacena Fabric of Hellenistic Volterra (Calyx-krater, Stamnos, Situla and the Achaemenid Rhython). Revue des Etudes Anciennes, 100-3-4, 619-662.

Sideris, A., 2015. Theseus in Thrace: The Silver Lining on the Clouds of the Athenian-Thracian Relations in the 5th Century BC. Sofia: Thrace Foundation.

Sideris, A., 2024. The Vratsa Situla and the Spread of the Palmette Motif. The Apogee of the Triballian Dynasty: The Triballoi and their Neighbours in the Classical and Early Hellenistic Times. Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Serdicensis, Supplementum VII, 49-69.

Skory, S., Khokhorovsky, Y. 2018. Bolshoi Ryzhanovsky Mound. Kyiv: Oleg Filyuk Publisher (in Russian).

Sparkes, B., 1977. Quintain and the Talcott class. Antike Kunst 20.1, 8-25.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013a. Antychne torhivelne sudno «Zmiinyi-Patrokl» (sklad produktsii). Archeologia, 3, 69-85.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013b. Pidvodno-arkheolohichne doslidzhennia antychnoho torhivelnoho sudna poblyzu o. Zmiinyi u Chornomu mori (polovyi sezon 2011 r.). Archeologia, 2, 64-77.

Themelis, P., Touratsoglou, G., 1997. Οι Ταφοι του Δερβενιου (Oi Tafoi toy Derbenioy). Athens.

Vickers, M., 1985. Artful crafts: the influence of metalwork on Athenian painted pottery. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 108-128.

Vickers, M., 2002. Potty prices. Ad Familiares 23, 9-10.

Vickers, M., 2010. Silver, horses and pots. In: Metzler, D. (ed.). Massadifiori. Essays presented to Herbert Hoffmann on his 80th birthday, 351-67.

Zimmermann, N. 1998. Beziehungen zwischen Ton- und Metallgefäßen spätklassischer und frühhellenistischer Zeit. Internationale Archäologie, 20. Leidorf: Rahden/Westf.

VITA ANTIQUA                                                                          ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Diana Dudnyk¹
At the Burin’s Edge : production and reutilisation of burins in the Mizyn assemblage
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-0855-3219

DOI: 

ABSTRACT

The article is focused on studying the assemblage of complete burins from the Mizyn site. This study investigates the technological aspects of burin production and offers a typological classification. A considerable presence of artefacts with evidence of reutilisation was found, which points to the intensive use of these tools. This paper is a part of the research project “Epigravettian lithic technologies of tool production, use, and discard: a case study of the Mizyn industry” made possible with the support of the German Archaeological Institute within the framework of the fellowship program “Documenting, Recording and Saving Ukrainian Archaeological Heritage”.

Keywords: Middle Dnipro basin, Epigravettian, Mizyn industry, lithics, burins, attribute analysis, technology, typology.

Lenguage: English

ПДФ

Cite us:

Dudnyk, D.V. 2025. At the Burin’s Edge : production and reutilisation of burins in the Mizyn assemblage. VITA ANTIQUA,16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

References:

Abramova, Z. A., Grigoreva, G. V. 1997. Verkhnepaleoliticheskoe poselenie Iudinovo. Vypusk 3. Sankt-Peterburg: IIMK RAN. (In Russian).

Velichko, A. A., Grekhova, L. V., Gribchenko, Y. N., Kurenkova, E. I. 1997. Early man in the extreme environmental conditions. Eliseevichi site. Moscow: Institute of geography RAS. (In Russian).

Velichko, A. A., Grekhova, L. V., Gubonina, Z. P. 1977. Early man environment at Timonovka sites. Moscow: «Nauka». (In Russian).

Voyevodsky, M. V. 1929. Station paleolitique de Timonovka. Journal Russe d'anthropologie, 18 (1-2), p. 59-70. (In Russian).

Voevodskii, M. V. 1952. Paleoliticheskaia stoianka Rabochii Rov (Chulatovo ІІ). Uchenye zapiski, 158, p. 101-132. (In Russian).

Voevodsky, M. V. 1947. Description des outils en silex et en os de la station paléolithique de Tchoulatov I. Le Paléolithique et le Néolithique de l`Ukraine, 1, p. 107-119. (In Ukrainain).

Galitch, D. Z. 1947. La station paléolithique de Tchoulatov II (Compte-rendu des fouilles de 1936). Le Paléolithique et le Néolithique de l`Ukraine, 1, p. 149-154. (In Ukrainain).

Gladilin, V. N. 1976. Problemy rannego paleolita Vostochnoi Evropy. Kiev: «Naukova dumka». (In Russian).

Grigoreva, G. V. 2008. O reztsakh verkhnepaleoliticheskogo poseleniia Iudinovo. V: Khlopachev, G. A. (red.). Khronologiia, periodizatsiia i krosskulturnye sviazi v kamennom veke. Zamiatninskii sbornik. Vypusk 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo «Nauka», p. 83-90. (In Russian).

Dudnyk, D. V. 2024. Core Reduction Methods of Mizyn Industry of Epigravettian Techno-Complex. Arheologia, 3, p. 120-148. (In Ukrainain). https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2024.03.121

Kononenko, O. M. 2018. Site Radomyshl’ I and its place in the Upper Palaeolithic of Ukraine. PhD thesis. Institute of Archaeology of NASU, Kyiv. (In Ukrainain). 

Nuzhnyi, D. Yu. 2015. The Upper Paleolithic of Western and Northern Ukraine. Kyiv: Oleh Filiuk. (In Ukrainian).

Nuzhnyi, D., Shydlovskyi, P., Lyzun, O. 2017. Upper Paleolithic sites Semenivka in the context of Epigravettian of the Middle Dnieper area. The Stone Age of Ukraine, 17-18, p. 16-47. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1268743

Khaykunova, N. A. 1992. The burins from the Upper Paleolithic site of Suponevo (an attempt of classification). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya, 2, p. 123-135. (In Russian).

Chabai, V. P., Stupak, D. V., Veselskyi, A. P., Dudnyk, D. V. 2020. Barmaky Site in the Context of Epigravettian of the Middle Dnieper Basin. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4 (37), p. 107-125. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2020.04.08

Shydlovskyi, P. S., Nuzhnyi, D. Yu., Pean, S. 2014. Production Inventory of area of cultural layer to the south from the first mezhyrichian dwelling. Archaeological Almanac, 31, p. 50-67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1195741

Shovkoplias, I. G. 1965. Mezinskaia stoianka. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo akademii nauk URSR. (In Russian).

Chabai, V., Dudnyk, D. 2022. The Barmaky, level 2 Epigravettian assemblage: the core reduction strategies. Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, 4 (45), p. 33-57. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.04.02

Chabai, V., Dudnyk, D., Pasda, K., Brandl, M. & Maier, A. 2022. Investigations at the Epigravettian site of Barmaky in Volhynia, north-west Ukraine: analyses and taxonomic reflections. Quartär, 69, p. 105-144. https://doi.org/10.7485/qu.2022.69.102375

Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche H., Tixier, J. 1999. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone followed by a multilingual vocabulary (Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish). Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée; 5. Nanterre: C.R.E.P. 

McPherron, S. P., Dibble, H. L. 2002. Using Computers in Archaeology: A Practical Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 127-148. 

Movius, H. L., David, N. C., Bricker, H. M., Clay, R. B. 1968. The analysis of certain major classes of Upper Palaeolithic tools. Bulletin of the American School of Prehistoric Research, 26. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Peabody Museum, Harvard University.

Jöris, O. 2001. Der spätmittelpaläolithische Fundplatz Buhlen (Grabungen 1966-69). Stratigraphie, Steinartefakte und Fauna des Oberen Fundplatzes. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie, 73. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelf GmbH.

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de, Perrot J. 1955. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur, Outillage lithique, III – Outils composites – Perçoirs. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 52 (1-2), pp. 76-79.

VITA ANTIQUA                  ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological research

VITA ANTIQUA 15, 2024, METHODS FOR MONITORING AND RESEARCH OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OBJECTS

Anastasiia Diachenko¹, Tymur Tyshechko²
Reconstruction of Slavic lifestyle through full-scale modeling
¹ National Museum of the History of Ukraine
² Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2449-0286
² ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8514-8572

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2024-15-137-154
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2024-15-137-154

ABSTRACT

The article is dedicated to one of the most promising directions in archaeological research – experimental archaeology. It outlines the significance of experimentation in modern archaeology in Ukraine and the world, explores the historiography of the problem, and shares the experience of archaeologist colleagues in reconstructing certain aspects of the lives and everyday activities of past generations. Key aspects of experimental archaeology include the creation of replicas or reconstructions to test hypotheses and enhance understanding of ancient objects and technologies. Furthermore, it underlines the practical meaning of experimental archaeology, such as the creation of open-air museums, which provide immersive experiences and contribute to the preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage.

The Northern Permanently Operating Archaeological Expedition of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine is engaged in the scientific and scientific and protective direction of studying the suburbs of Kyiv. Research mainly concerns the ancient Rus period. The recreation of ancient Rus technologies through their full-scale modeling is not new for the employees of the expedition. Based on this, at the territory of the Khodosivka archaeological complex, models of Early Slavonic ovens were recreated as a source of knowledge about the everyday life of medieval society in Ukraine.

The paper provides a detailed description of the construction of models of two heating devices, prototypes of which are dated mainly from the 12th to the first half of the 13th century. All stages of their creation are characterized: from studying general information about the ovens and planning the future reconstruction, to processing the collected data and implementing the experiment. Based on the modeling of these experiments, the functional capabilities of the reconstructed ovens are revealed. The significance of the conducted experiment lies in its ability to deepen our understanding of the daily life of the Kyivan Rus population. While previous research focused on technologies used in creating various economic and residential structures, this work demonstrates how reconstructed models aid in delving into the study of ancient domesticity. Since the chronicle tradition does not cover all aspects of ancient society’s life, and archaeological evidence alone does not provide a precise picture of the population’s spiritual and everyday life, this experiment allows for a more detailed exploration of these aspects.

Key words: experiment, modeling, skansen, oven, heating device, Ancient Rus, Khodosivka.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Diachenko, А.V., Tyshechko, T.L. 2024. Vidtvorennia slovianskoho pobutu shliakhom naturnoho modeliuvannia [Reconstruction of Slavic lifestyle through full-scale modeling]. VITA ANTIQUA, 15. Methods for Monitoring and Research of Archaeological Heritage Objects, 137-154.

References:

Artiukh, L.F. 1977. Ukrainska narodna kulinariia: istoryko-etnohraf. doslidzh. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1977.

Baiburyn, A.K. 1983. Zhylyshche v obriadakh y predstavlenyiakh Vostochnыkh slavian. Lenynhrad: Nauka.

Bobrynskyi, A.A. 1978. Honcharstvo Vostochnoi Evropы: ystochnyky y metodы yzuchenyia. Moskva: Nauka.

Borysenko, V.K. 1997. Povsiakdenna yizha ta rytualni stravy. V: Borysenko, V.K. (red.). Kholmshchyna i Pidliashshia: Istoryko-etnohrafichne doslidzhennia. Kyiv: Rodovid, s. 215-222.

Counihan, C.M., 1999. The Anthropology of Food and Body: Gender, Meaning and Power. New York: Routledge.

Danyliuk, A.H. 2008. Davnia arkhitektura ukrainskoho sela : etnohraf. narys. Kyiv: Tekhnika.

Diachenko, A.V., Tyshechko, T.L. 2023. Eksperymentalne studiiuvannia okremykh aspektiv pobutu slov’ian u Khodosivtsi. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2022, s. 382-385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12598298 .

Fylypchuk, M.A. 1995. Skhidnoslov’ianske zhytlo X – pochatku XI st. v Ukrainskomu Prykarpatti. Materialy i doslidzhennia z arkheolohii Prykarpattia i Volyni, 6, s. 219-233.

Hastorf, C.A., 2017. The Social Archaeology of Food: thinking about eating from Prehistory to the present. New York: CUP.

Hlushko, M.S. 2012. Pokhodzhennia ta dzherela vchynenoho khliba v ukraintsiv (kulturno-henetychnyi aspekt). Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 1, s. 3-18.

Horbanenko, S.A. 2021. Pich yak vivtar u slov’ianskii oseli i rol zharovni. Materialy Naukovoi arkheolohichnoi onlain-konferentsii “Vid yazychnytstva do khrystyianstva: relihiini viruvannia rannoserednovichnoho naselennia Serednoho Podniprov’ia” (Vyshhorod, 21 hrudnia 2020 r.). Vyshhorod; Kyiv: Mystetstvo, s. 14-24.

Hotun, I.A. 2001. Arkheolohichni materialy pro rol budivel v dukhovnomu zhytti davnoho naselennia. V: Nelina, T.V. (red.). Etnokulturni protsesy u Serednomu Podniprov’i za materialamy arkheolohichnykh doslidzhen. Materialy nauk. konf., prysv. 10–richchiu vidkryttia kompleksu arkheol. pam’iatok mizh selamy Malopolovetske ta Yakhny Fastiv. r-nu Kyiv. obl. (hrud. 2001 r., m. Fastiv). Kyiv: T-vo «Znannia» Ukrainy, s. 24-30.

Hotun, I.A. 2010. Arkheolohichne vyvchennia budivel davnoruskoho sela Serednoho Podniprov’ia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1, s. 94-99.

Hotun, I.A. 2010. Novyi etap doslidzhen starozhytnostei Sofiivskoi Borshchahivky. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2009, s. 30-32.

Hotun, I.A. 2013. Slov’iano-ruske silske zhytlo ta pytannia yoho vidtvorennia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 10, s. 20-34.

Hotun, I.A. 2016. Sotsialno-vyrobnycha struktura zabudovy sela Serednoho Podniprov’ia Kh–XIII st. Avtoreferat dysertatsii k. i. n. IA NANU.

Hotun, I.A. 2019. Vidobrazhennia u masovii zabudovi dukhovnoho zhyttia naselennia Rusi. V: Kovalenko, O.B. (red.). Za poklykom predkiv: Zbirnyk materialiv P’iatykh Samokvasivskykh chytan, prysviachenykh pam’iati V.P. Kovalenka. Chernihiv: SCRIPTORIUM, s. 142-150.

Hotun, I.A., Horbanenko, S.A., Serhieieva, M.S. 2016. Zhytlo z Sofiivskoi Borshchahivky ta proiavy odnoho iz davnikh slov’ianskykh obriadiv. Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego, 37, s. 325-332.

Hotun, I.A., Kazymir, O.M. 2010. Khodosivskyi arkheolohichnyi kompleks: vyvchennia, okhorona, eksperymentalne modeliuvannia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1, s. 100-108.

Hotun, I.A., Kazymir, O.M., Koval, O.A., Petrauskas, A.V., Petrauskene, A.O. 2011. Muzei pid vidkrytym nebom ta ekspozytsiini mozhlyvosti ekspedytsiinykh baz eksperymentalnoi arkheolohii. V: Motsia, O.P. (red.). Eksperymentalna arkheolohiia: zavdannia, metody, modeliuvannia. Kyiv: Vyd-vo Lira-K, s. 29-92.

Hotun, I.A., Koval, O.A., Petrauskas, A.V. 2008. Eksperymentalne vyvchennia bortnytstva Pivnichnoiu ekspedytsiieiu. Zhyttia bdzhil ta sutnist bortnoho promyslu. Arkheolohiia, 4, s. 76-86.

Hotun, I.A., Petrauskas, A.V., Petrauskas, O.V. 2005a. Eksperymentalna arkheolohiia u roboti Pivnichnoi ekspedytsii. Doslidzhennia u haluzi honcharstva. Arkheolohiia, 2, s. 70-79.

Hotun, I.A., Petrauskas, A.V., Petrauskas, O.V. 2005b. Modeliuvannia chornometalurhiinykh ta lisokhimichnykh protsesiv za materialamy Pivnichnoi ekspedytsii. Arkheolohiia, 3, s. 52-65.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A. 2011. Okhoronni doslidzhennia u Sofiivskii Borshchahivtsi. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2010, s. 165-167.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Babenko, R.V., Synytsia, Ye.V., Nepomiashchykh, V.Yu., Shakhrai, D.O., Hun, M.O., Loznytsia, T.V. 2016. Vyvchennia pivnichnoi chastyny Sofiivsko-Borshchahivskoho poselennia. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2015, s. 67-71.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Babenko, R.V., Synytsia, Ye.V., Nepomiashchykh, V.Yu., Shakhrai, D.O., Osypenko, M.S., Hun, M.O., Loznytsia, T.V. 2015a. Rozkopky pivdennoi chastyny Sofiivsko-Borshchahivskoho selyshcha. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2014, s. 90-94.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Babenko, R.V., Synytsia, Ye.V., Shakhrai, D.O., Hun, M.O., Loznytsia, T.V. 2018. Okhoronni doslidzhennia pivdenno-zakhidnoi chastyny Sofiivsko-Borshchahivskoho poselennia. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2016, s. 86-88.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Hryhorchuk, O.I., Hrytsyk, Yu.O., Tereshchuk, K.O. 2012. Prodovzhennia okhoronnykh robit u Sofiivskii Borshchahivtsi. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2011, s. 234-235.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Nepomiashchykh, V.Yu., Osadchyi, R.M., Kolosov, Yu.H., Shakhrai, D.O., Hun, M.O., Loznytsia, T.V., Hrytsyk, Yu.O., Osypenko, M.S. 2014. Pam’iatkookhoronni rozkopky u Sofiivskii Borshchahivtsi. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2013, s. 151-152.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Osypenko, M.S., Synytsia, Ye.V., Nepomiashchykh, V.Yu., Shakhrai, D.O., Hun, M.O., Loznytsia, T.V. 2015b. Prodovzhennia doslidzhen rozkopu III na selyshchi v Sofiivskii Borshchahivtsi. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2014, s. 87-90.

Kazymir, O.M., Hotun, I.A., Tereshchuk, K.O., Hrytsyk, Yu.O., Synytsia, Ye.V., Hun, M.O. 2013. Roboty Borshchahivskoho zahonu Pivnichnoi ekspedytsii. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2012, s. 200-203.

Kepin, D.V. 2002. «Arkheoparky»: problemy ta perspektyvy. Rzhyshchivskyi arkheodrom. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia ta eksperymentalni studii 2000—2001 rokiv. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka, s. 78-89.

Kepin, D.V. 2007. Typolohichna kharakterystyka muzeiv prosto neba. PTsP, 12, s. 131-155.

Kepin, D.V. 2009. Vnesok Y. Pleinerovoi u rozvytok arkheolohichnoho muzeinytstva. V: Tytova, O.M. (red.). Pratsi Tsentru pam’iatkoznavstva, 16, s. 111-118.

Kravchenko, N.M., Strunka, M.L. 1984. Rekonstruktsiia inter’ieru slov’ianskoho zhytla VIII—IX st. Arkheolohiia, 54, s. 84-95.

Liapushkyn, Y.Y. 1968. Slaviane Vostochnoi Evropy nakanune obrazovanyia Drevnerusskoho hosudarstva (VIII — pervaia polovyna IX vv.). Materialy yssledovanyia po arkheolohyy SSSR, 152. Lenynhrad: Nauka.

Malinovi, R. a J. 1982. Vzpomínky na minulost aneb Experimenty odhalují taemství pravěku. Ostrava: Nakladatelství Profil.

Malynova, R., Malyna, Ya. 1988. Prizhok v proshloe: Eksperyment raskryvaet taini drevnykh epokh. Moskva: Mysl.

Olenych, A.M., Bibikov, D.V., Ivakin, V.H., Zotsenko, I.V. 2017. Eksperymentalna rekonstruktsiia davnoruskoho honcharnoho hornu (za materialamy remisnychoho posadu Vyshhoroda). Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1 (22), s. 225-229.

Olenych, A.M, Chymyrys, M.V. 2019. Living Museums of Prehistoric times in Ukraine (statement of a question) (Zhyvi muzei pervisnoi doby v Ukraini (postanovka pytannia)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 180-184 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-185-189 .

Petrashenko, V.A. 2005. Drevnerusskoe selo (po materyalam poselenyi u s. Hrohorovka). Kyiv: IA NANU.

Petrauskas, A.V. 2010. Eksperymentalna arkheolohiia ta modeliuvannia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1, s. 167-173.

Petrauskas, O.V., Koval, O.A. 2012. Slov’ianski hlynobytni pechi ostannoi chverti I tys. poselennia Obukhiv 2 (tekhniko-tekhnolohichni osoblyvosti pobudovy ta ekspluatatsii). Arkheolohiia, 4, s.110-121.

Petrauskas, O.V., Koval, O.A. 2017. Eksperymentalni roboty Komarivskoi arkheolohichnoi ekspedytsii v 2015r. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1 (22), s. 216-225.

Pleiner, R. 1961. Experiment v archeologii. Památky archeologické, 52, s. 616-622.

Pleinerova, I. 1986. Brezno: Experiments with building Old Slavic houses and living in them. Památky archeologické, 77, s. 104-176.

Poliovi etnohrafichni materialy do temy «Khlib v tradytsiinii kulturi ukraintsiv», zafiksovani Ziubrovskym Andriiem Viktorovychem 27—29 serpnia 2010 r. u Zdolbunivskomu r-ni Rivnenskoi obl. Arkhiv IN NAN Ukrainy. F.1. Op.2. 137 ark.

Poliovi etnohrafichni materialy do temy «Khlib v tradytsiinii kulturi ukraintsiv», zafiksovani Ziubrovskym Andriiem Viktorovychem 7—19 lypnia 2010 r. u Horokhivskomu r-ni Volynskoi obl. Arkhiv LNU im. I. Franka. F. 119. Op. 17. 336 ark.

Ramírez Cañas, C., Martínez de los Reyes, P.I., Sáez Romero, A. M. 2023. An Experimental Approach to Tannur Ovens and Bread Making in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula during the Iron Age. EXARC Journal [onlain], 2. https://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10689 Available at: experimental-approach-tannur-ovens. https://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10689 .

Rappoport, P.A. 1975. Drevnerusskoe zhylyshche. V: Rabynovych, M.H. (red.). Drevnee zhylyshche narodov Vostochnoi Evropy. Moskva: Nauka, s. 104-155.

Rusanova, Y.P. 1976. Slavianskye drevnosty VI—VII vv. Moskva: Nauka.

Rusanova, Y.P. 1993. Khlebnye pechy u slavian. V: Arkheolohyia y ystoryia Yuho-Vostoka Drevnei Rusy. Voronezh: yzd. VHU, s. 56-59.

Ryzhov, S.M., Stepanchuk, V.M., Vietrov, V.S., Naumenko, O.O., Pohorilets, O.H., 2019. Dosvid vprovadzhennia eksperymentalnykh doslidzhen v arkheolohii kam’ianoho viku: osvita, nauka ta muzeieznavstvo. Vita Antiqua, 11, s. 78–91. https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-78-91 .

Serheieva, M.S. 1993. K ystoryy bytovoi pechy u vostochnykh slavian. V: Arkheolohyia y ystoryia Yuho-Vostoka Drevnei Rusy. Voronezh: yzd. VHU, s. 60-61.

Serheieva, M.S. 1995. Pro odyn typ opaliuvalnykh prystroiv u davnoruskomu zhytli. V: Problemi arkheolohyy, drevnei y srednevekovoi ystoryy Ukrayni. Kharkov: AO «Byznes Ynform», s. 90-91.

Siletskyi, R.B. 2001. Problema typolohii opaliuvalnykh prystroiv starodavnoho zhytla v Ukraini (konstruktyvno-funktsionalni osoblyvosti pechi). Zapysky Naukovoho tovarystva imeni Shevchenka, 242, s. 230-247.

Siletskyi, R.B. 2008. Opaliuvalni prystroi narodnoho zhytla serednoho Polissia (konstruktyvno-funktsionalnyi ta svitohliadnyi aspekty). Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu, 43, s. 134-183.

Smilenko, A.T. 1989. K yzuchenyiu lokalnыkh osobennostei kulturы soiuzov vostochnoslavianskykh plemen VIII—IX vv. V: Tolochko, P.P. (red.). Drevnye slaviane y Kyevskaia Rus. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, s. 105-114.

Sumtsov, N.F. 1885. Khleb v obriadakh y pesniakh. Kharkov: Typohrafyia Zylberberha.

Tretiakov, P.N. 1948. Vostochnoslavianskye cherty v bitu prydunaiskoi Bolharyy. Sovetskaia etnografiya, 2, s. 170-183.

Tytova, O.M. 2009. Zberezhennia nerukhomykh pam’iatok arkheolohii v zapovidnykakh i muzeiakh. V: Tytova, O.M. (red.). Pratsi Tsentru pam’iatkoznavstv, 15, s. 83-86.

Tytova, O.M., Kepin, D.V. 2002. Muzeinyi pokaz davnikh zhytel Ukrainskoho Polissia (za arkheolohichnymy materialamy). PTsP, 4, s. 49-71.

Tytova, O.M., Kepin, D.V. 2003. Muzei prosto neba na Kyivshchyni. V: Kotsur, V.P. (red.). Vid Trypilskoi kultury do suchasnosti (Vidpochyvaite v selakh Kyivshchyny): Putivnyk-dovidnyk. Kyiv: “Kolo-Ra”, s. 145-155.

Ukrainska Keramolohiia: Natsionalnyi naukovyi shchorichnyk. 2013. Kn. IV, T.1: Eksperyment u suchasnii keramolohii. Opishne: Ukrainske Narodoznavstvo.

Videiko, M.Yu. 2002. Zapovidnyk ta arkheolohichnyi festyval v Biskupini (Polshcha). Rzhyshchivskyi arkheodrom. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia ta eksperymentalni studii 2000—2001 rokiv. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka, s. 89-94.

Vovk, Kh.K. 1928. Studii z ukrainskoi etnohrafii ta antropolohii. Praha: Ukrainskyi hromadskyi vydavnychyi fond.

Vovk, Kh.K. 1995. Etnohrafichni osoblyvosti ukrainskoho narodu. Studii z ukrainskoi etnohrafii ta antropolohii. Kyiv: Mystetstvo, s. 39-218.

Yurenko, S.P. 1984. Domobudivnytstvo naselennia Dniprovskoho Livoberezhzhia v VIII—X st. Arkheolohiia, 45, s. 35-46.

Ziubrovskyi, A.V. 2010. Tradytsiina osnova vypikannia khliba na Rivnenshchyni (za materialamy polovykh doslidzhen Hoshchanskoho ta Ostrozkoho raioniv Rivnenskoi obl. u lypni 2009 roku). Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 5-6, s. 776-783.

Ziubrovskyi, A.V. 2014. Vypikannia povsiakdennoho khliba ukraintsiv pivdenno-zakhidnoho istoryko-etnohrafichnoho rehionu v kintsi KhIKh — na pochatku KhKhI stolit. Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 2, s. 250-265.

VITA ANTIQUA           ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological research

VITA ANTIQUA 15, 2024, METHODS FOR MONITORING AND RESEARCH OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OBJECTS

Alisa Sokolovska ¹
Artificial Intelligence and Prospects for its Use in the Study of Upper Palaeolithic Rock Art
¹ Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5626-2538

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2024-15-127-135
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2024-15-127-135

ABSTRACT

The problem raised in this article is that since the discovery of rock art, the scientific community has been facing many questions related to the development of rock art and its semantic basis. It is becoming more and more difficult for us to call rock paintings the product of only religious or magical ideas, how researchers of the last century thought about it, and it is obviously simply impossible to look into the minds of people who lived thousands of years ago.

The topic of cave paintings is a complex issue, for the study of which we must involve not only archaeological research methods, but also ethnographic and art historical ones. In my opinion, we should try to involve  other  scientific  fields,  in  addition  to  those  already  mentioned  above,  and  apply  the  latest technologies.

Until recently, the only analogies we had available to us were ethnographic comparisons of the creativity and worldviews of primitive societies, but science is not standing still. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence has appeared on the scene, developing like humans, and what is interesting to us is that it is also developing in the field of fine art.

Why do we need to use artificial intelligence to analyse rock art at all? Because, as humans, we often see only what we want to see and therefore project our own worldview onto the analysis of rock art, which makes this analysis more of a psychological portrait of its author than an analysis as such. If we engage in analysis in a machine that is guided only by knowledge and has no worldview, which allows us to use a literally objective ‘opinion’ for analysis, it will not project its own worldview onto the results of the analysis, because it does not have one by definition.

The study raises the question of how we can put artificial intelligence technologies to work now and in the near future. The research methods are an analysis of the level of development of this topic in scientific research and articles by other scholars and an attempt to use such a type of analysis as a comparative analysis in relation to works created by Artificial Intelligence and works created by ancient man, which may, in the future, give us the opportunity to comprehend the images left to us by people of the Palaeolithic era.

The scientific novelty of the work lies in the proposal and attempt to use Artificial Intelligence technology as a tool for the study of Palaeolithic rock art, which has not been used before and did not go beyond assumptions.

According to the results of the study, we can trace a certain similarity between the early works of art created by Artificial Intelligence and abstract works created by ancient humans in the Paleolithic period. Of course, we cannot say that the development of human and AI art is identical, because again, they are fundamentally different. A person painted because he was inspired to do so, and a machine painted because it had a task. Nevertheless, I believe that this study, although it may seem absurd at first glance in the long run, no matter how pretentious it sounds, may be our step towards finding answers to the questions that we have not been able to find for more than a hundred years.

Key words: Archaeological studies, rock painting, artificial intelligence, Upper Palaeolithic, modern research methods.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Sokolovska, A.A. 2024. Shtuchnyi Intelekt ta perspektyvy yoho vykorystannia dlia doslidzhennia naskelnoho zhyvopysu doby verkhnoho paleolitu [Artificial Intelligence and Prospects for its Use in the Study of Upper Palaeolithic Rock Art]. VITA ANTIQUA, 15. Methods for Monitoring and Research of Archaeological Heritage Objects, 127-135.

References:

Beautyandai. 2023. History of AI Art from 1960s to 2023 [online]. https://beautyandai.com/blogs/beauty-and-ai-blog/history-of-ai-art/?srsltid=AfmBOoqcT2AsYCJMIfb4DcR__HvnmBh3u-P2bu4D7e7pqtse4IVqeO25 [30 August 2024].

Colson, А. 2020. Rock Art and AI [online]. UCL Heritage Science and Engineering Network Blog. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/ [30 August 2024].

Computer History Museum. 2016. Harold Cohen and AARON—A 40-Year Collaboration [online]. https://computerhistory.org/blog/harold-cohen-and-aaron-a-40-year-collaboration/ [30 August 2024].

Digitalartsblog. 2024. History of AI Generated Art [online]. https://www.digitalartsblog.com/tips/history-of-ai-generated-art [30 August 2024].

Katevassgalerie. 2024. Harold Cohen: ‘Once upon a time there was an entity named Aaron’ [online]. https://www.katevassgalerie.com/blog/harold-cohen-aaron-computer-art [30 August 2024].

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1992) ‘Paleoliticheskoe peshchernoe iskusstvo (religioznoe iskusstvo)’, In: Posrednikov, V.A. (ed.), Donetskii arkheologicheskii sbornik, 2. Donetsk: Avers Ko, pp. 9-29.

Outland. 2022. The Prophecies of AARON [online].: https://outland.art/harold-cohen-aaron/ [30 August 2024].

VITA ANTIQUA           ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological research

VITA ANTIQUA 15, 2024, METHODS FOR MONITORING AND RESEARCH OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OBJECTS

Liubov Yeredenko ¹
Photogrammetry. Practical application in Archaeology : Scientific and Public Perspectives
¹ Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4337-5582

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2024-15-115-125
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2024-15-115-125

ABSTRACT

The article is the result of the 2024 qualification work by the author, a student of the Department of Archaeology and Museology at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The theoretical part about photogrammetry, which is based on the study of foreign and domestic historiography on the subject, is briefly presented in the introduction and the section «About Photogrammetry».

In the introduction, the author raises the issue of proper documentation: both traditional and new methods. The objectivity of archaeological drawing and photography is discussed, as well as the striking difference between 2D and 3D images in terms of the amount and quality of preserved information about the object. The section «About Photogrammetry» briefly outlines the history of photogrammetry and its increasing use in archaeological research. Photogrammetry is compared with laser scanning systems, and the advantages of combining these methods are examined.

The sections «Practical Experience» and «Results» display the achievements of a workshop on artifact scanning using the photogrammetry method. With the support of the non-governmental organization «Scientific and Research Lab ‘Archaїc’,» a small catalogue of artifacts was created. The experience was step-by-step and thoroughly described in this article. The results section specifies the potential for using the obtained models for future scientific purposes – both for analysis and for preserving at least digital copies in emergencies. The use of 3D models by activists for promoting and protecting the heritage site is also demonstrated.

The conclusions summarize the findings and bring out the main theme of the work – the importance of protecting the Kytaiv Archaeological Complex, its place and significance in the cultural life and archaeology of Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine; the importance of developing archaeological documentation; and the importance of representing academic science to the public through dialogue, including the publication of materials such as 3D models.

Key words: photogrammetry, 3D scanning, monument protection, Kytaiv Archaeological Complex, digitalization of archaeological sites.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Yeredenko, L.I. 2024. Fotohrammetriia. Praktychne zastosuvannia v arkheolohii : naukovi ta hromadski perspektyvy [Photogrammetry. Practical application in Archaeology : Scientific and Public Perspectives]. VITA ANTIQUA, 15. Methods for Monitoring and Research of Archaeological Heritage Objects, 115-125.

References:

Ivakin, H., Baranov, V., Ivakin, V., Zotsenko, I., Bibikov, D., Olenych, A., Pereverziev, S. 2019. Naukovo-riativni doslidzhennia Arkhitekturno-arkheolohichnoi ekspedytsii IA NANU na terytorii m. Kyieva. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2017. p. 59–62 (in Ukranian).

Kleijn, M., Hond, R., Martinez-Rubi, O. 2016. A 3D spatial data infrastructure for Mapping the Via Appia. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 3 (2), p. 23-32.

Linka, N.V. 1952. Roboty ekspedytsii «Velykyi Kyiv» za 1947. In: Yefymenko, P. P. (ed.) Arkheolohichni pamiatky, T. III, p. 39-53 (in Ukranian).

Movchan, I.I. 1993. Pivdennyi forpost starodavnioho Kyieva. Tolochko, P.P. (ed.) Starodavnii Kyiv. Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia 1984-1989. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. p. 187-205 (in Ukranian).

Polo, M., Felicísimo, Á.M., Durán-Domínguez, G. 2022. Accurate 3D models in both geometry and texture: An archaeological application. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 27, e00248.

Remondino, F., Campana, S. 2014. 3D Modeling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: Theory and Best Practices. n.p.: BAR International Series.

Saif, W. 2022. Photogrammetry: A Brief Historical Overview. ScRAP Guidance (n.d.) 3D Field Recording. PART 1: What is it?. n.p.

Save Kytaiv 2023-2024 [online]. Access mode: https://savekytayiv.com/ [Date of application: 11 September 2024].

Scientific and research lab «Archaїc»  2019-2024 [online]. Access mode: https://archaic.com.ua/ [Date of application: 11 September 2024].

Shishkin, K.V. 1973. Z praktiki deshifruvannia aerofotoznimkiv v arkheologichnikh tsiliakh. Arkheolohiia, 52, p. 32–38 (in Ukranian).

Wilczek, J. 2013. Metody 3D akvizice a jejich aplikace v archeologii (e-learningové materiály). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Zhyhola, V., Skorokhod, V. 2021. Zastosuvannia fotohrammetrychnykh metodiv u keramolohii. Arkheolohichna keramolohiia, 1-2 (5-6), p. 181–191.

VITA ANTIQUA           ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological research

VITA ANTIQUA 15, 2024, METHODS FOR MONITORING AND RESEARCH OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OBJECTS

Anastasiia Diachenko ¹
Ceramics from the Andriivka settlement : new approaches to the preservation of archaeological material
¹ National Museum of the History of Ukraine
¹ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2449-0286

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2024-15-103-114
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2024-15-103-114

ABSTRACT

The paper presents general information about the Volodymyrivka local group of the Cucuteni-Trypillia Cultural Complex (CTCC) and its material culture, based on ceramic material from the Andriivka settlement. This settlement is one of the few that belong to this local group.

The research history of the Volodymyrivka group sites is described. It is noted that, apart from the eponymous site, where full-scale excavations were conducted, other settlements of this group were investigated using surface collection and test-pitting methods. The same approach was applied to the Andriivka settlement, whose materials became the subject of this article. The settlement itself is located on the south-eastern outskirts of the village of Andriivka, in the Novomyrhorod district of Kirovohrad region. According to preliminary estimates, the area of the Trypillia settlement covers about 60 ha.

The main focus of the paper is on ceramic production, which is one of the key criteria for distinguishing local groups within the CTCC. The ceramic complex from the Andriivka settlement, which is part of the collection of the Archaeological Museum of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, includes vessels and clay figurines. Despite the fragmented nature of the material, it supports previous conclusions about the settlement’s belonging to the Volodymyrivka group of Trypillia sites.

Additionally, part of the artefacts from the Andriivka settlement has been digitized. The digitization of museum collections plays an important role in the popularization of archaeological heritage and makes it more accessible to a wider audience. The digitized objects allow not only researchers but also all interested individuals to access information about the Trypillia culture, its development, and the characteristics of its material culture, particularly ceramic production.

Consequently, the study of the ceramic complex from the Andriivka settlement provides valuable insights into the local features of ceramic production within the Volodymyrivka group of the CTCC.

Key words: Keywords: Cucuteni-Trypillia Cultural Complex, Middle Buh region, Volodymyrivka group, Andriivka, ceramic production, digitization of museum collections.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Diachenko, A.V. 2024. Keramika z poselennia Andriivka : suchasnyi pidkhid do zberezhennia arkheolohichnoho materialu [Ceramics from the Andriivka settlement : new approaches to the preservation of archaeological material]. VITA ANTIQUA, 15. Methods for Monitoring and Research of Archaeological Heritage Objects, 103-114.

References:

Balme, J., Paterson, A. 2009. Archaeology in Practice: A Student Guide to Archaeological Analyses. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Burdo, N.B. 2001. Terakota tripilskoi kultury. Davnja keramika Ukrainy : arheologichni dzherela ta rekonstrukciyi, ch. 1. Kyiv: Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, p. 61–146.

Gusev, S.O. 2021. Zoomorfni zobrazhennya z tripilskykh poselen etap BII Serednyogo Pobuzhzhya. Arkheolohiia, 3, p. 36-46.

Zalizniak, L.L. 2014. Nova mustierska stoianka Andriivka 4 na Kirovohradshchyni. Arkheolohiia, 1, p. 74–84.

Kruts, V.A., Ryzhov, S.M. 1988. Otchet o rabote Talyankovskogo otryada Tripolskoy ekspedicii v 1988 g. Kyiv: Scientific Archive, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, 1988/4a, 34 ark.

Movsha, T.G. 1972. Periodizatsiya i khronologiya serednogo ta piznogo Tripillya. Arkheolohiia, 5, p. 3-23.

Movsha, T.G. 1973. Novi dani pro antropomorfnu realistichnu plastiku Trypillia. Arkheolohiia, 11, p. 3–21.

Movsha, T.G. 1975. Antropomorfnaya plastika Tripolya (realisticheskiy stil). Avtoref. dys. ... kand. ist. nauk. Kyiv, 24 p.

Ovchinnikov, E.V. 2014. Trypilska kultura Kanivskoho Podniproviia. Kyiv: Pub. Oleg Filyuk.

Passek, T.S. 1941. Tripolskoe poselenie u Vladimirovki. Vestnik drevney istorii, 1, p. 214.

Passek, T.S. 1947. Tripolskoe poselenie u Vladimirovki v svete novykh issledovaniy. KSIIMK, XXI, p. 65-72.

Passek, T.S. 1948. Tripolskie modeli zhilyshcha. Vestnik drevney istorii, 4 (5), p. 240-241.

Passek, T.S. 1949. Periodizatsiya tripolskikh poseleniy. Materialy i issledovaniya po arheologii SSSR, 10, p. 245.

Pichkur, E. 2012. The flint tools of Andreevka, the Tripolian settlement on the Bolshaya Vys River. In: Menotti, F., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A.G. (eds.). The Tripolye culture giant-settlements in Ukraine: formation, development and decline. Oxford: Oxbow Books, p. 169-182.

Pogoševa, A.P. 1985. Die Statuetten Tripolje-Kultur. Beitrage zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archaologie, 7. Berlin: Verlag Philipp von Zabern: 95-242.

Ryzhov, S.M. 1993. Nebelivska grupa pam’yatok tripilskoi kultury. Arkheolohiia, 3, p. 101-114.

Ryzhov, S.M. 1999. Keramika poselen trypilskoi kultury Buho-Dniprovskoho mezhyrichchia iak istorychne dzherelo. Dys. ... kand. ist. nauk. Kyiv: Scientific Archive, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine.

Ryzhov, S.M. 2007. Suchasnyi stan vyvchennia kulturno-istorychnoi spilnoty kukuten-trypillia na teritorii Ukrainy. In: O. Olzhych. Arkheolohiia. Kyiv: Pub. Olena Teliga, p. 437–477.

Sketchfab. 2023. Model of the temple, 4100 – 3600 ВСЕ [online]. https://skfb.ly/oUrRO .

Sketchfab, 2024. Archaeological Museum of KNU [online]. https://sketchfab.com/archeology_knu .

Fedorov, S.S., Rud, V.S. 2015. Bahatosharova pam’iatka Andriivka. In: Boltryk, Yu.V. (ed.). Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2014. Kyiv: Starodavniy svit, p. 116–118.

Tsvyek, E.V., Ozerov, P.I. 1989. Otchet o razvedke arheologicheskikh pamyatnikov v Novomirgorodskom rayone Kirovogradskoi oblasti. Kyiv: Scientific Archive, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, 1987-1989/40b, 32 ark.

Yakubenko, O.O. 1990. Rezultaty arheolohichnykh doslidzhen trypilskoho poselennia Volodymyrivka (Kirovohradska oblast), provedenykh 1989 roku. Deiaki osnovni napriamy vdoskonalennia diialnosti muzeiv na suchasnomu etapi. Tematychnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kyiv: DIM URSR, p. 92-102.

Yakubenko, O.O. 1993. Okhoronni rozkopky trypilskoho poselennia Volodymyrivka (Kirovohradska oblast), provedenykh u 1989-1990 rokakh. Arheolohichni doslidzhennia, provedeni na terytorii Ukrainy protiahom 80-kh rokiv derzhavnymy orhanamy okhorony pamiatok ta muzeiamy respubliky. Tematychnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kyiv: DIM URSR, p. 61-76.

Yakubenko, O.O. 2011. Antropomorfna plastyka trypilskoho poselennia Volodymyrivka. In: Oliinyk, Yu. (ed.). Natsionalnyi muzei istorii Ukrainy. Tematychnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats (20 rokiv nezalezhnosti Ukrainy). Kyiv: NMIU, p. 56-80.

Yakubenko, O.O. 2011. Zoomorfna plastyka ta posud z trypilskoho poselennia Volodymyrivka v kolektsii muzeiu. In: Oliinyk, Yu. (ed.). Natsionalny muzei istorii Ukrainy. Tematychnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kyiv: NMIU, p. 354-374.

Yakubenko, O.O., Videiko, M.Yu. 2015. Trypilske poselennia bilia sela Volodymyrivka i volodymyrivska hrupa pamiatok. Na skhidnii mezhi Staroï Yevropy. Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii Kirovohrad - Nebelivka, 12-14 May 2015. Kirovohrad, p. 82-85.