Без рубрики – VITA ANTIQUA

Andr09.12.202509.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Andriy Dubiaha ¹
Comparative Analysis of the Burial Rites of the Donets and Middle Don Catacomb Cultures
¹Donetsk Regional Institute of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education
¹ORCID: 0000-0002-8143-4980
DOI:

ABSTRACT

At the beginning of the 21st century, the classic of the study of the catacomb culture of the Middle Bronze Age, S.N. Bratchenko, proposed a new taxonomic unit - the Donetsk-Don (Don) catacomb culture, which absorbed the Donetsk, Middle Don and West Manich catacomb cultures. Today, there is no generally accepted and balanced approach among scientists to the differentiation of archaeological cultures, which significantly complicates their study. Quite often, as the main criterion for distinguishing cultures, scientists take secondary features as a basis, which leads to inappropriate pluralism in this issue. S.N. Bratchenko tried to create a clear system of differentiation of catacomb cultures. However, during his lifetime, the researcher did not have time to fully substantiate the theory he put forward and summarize all available materials. This created the basis for the rejection of the proposed taxonomic unit and the emergence of a number of discussions about it. The article is an attempt to argue the position of the classicist on the basis of a comparative analysis of the burial rite of the Donetsk and Middle Don catacomb cultures, namely such elements as the pose and orientation of the deceased. The results obtained indicate, if not the identity of the main elements of the burial rite of these catacomb cultures, then at least a great similarity. Thus, the proposal put forward by S.N. Bratchenko is confirmed at the statistical level. Therefore, the introduction of the taxonomic unit “Donetsk-Don (Don)” catacomb culture is appropriate and relevant. The article does not claim to be a comprehensive generalization, but is another attempt to substantiate the ideas put forward by the classic of the study of catacomb antiquities.

Keywords: S.N. Bratchenko, Middle Bronze Age, catacomb culture, Donetsk catacomb culture, Middle Don catacomb culture, burial rite, taxonomic unit, Donetsk-Don (Don) catacomb culture.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Dubiaha, А.P. 2025. Comparative Analysis of the Burial Rites of the Donets and Middle Don Catacomb Cultures.. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Berdanosovka. Kurgannyi mogilnik. Sbornik nauchnykh statei. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012. S. 139–188.

Berezučkaia T.Iu. Srednedonskaia katakombnaia kultura i ee lokalnye varianty po materialam pogrebalnykh pamiatnikov. Voronezh, 2003. 216 s.

Bespalyi E.I., Bespalyi G.E. Kurgannyi mogilnik Mukhin. Aksaiskie drevnosti. Rostov-na-Donu, 2002. 55 s.

Bratchenko S.N. Katakombne baroko z ovalamy ta petliamy v systemi ornamentatsii. MDASU, 2007. №8. S. 103–109.

Bratchenko S.N. Oleksandrivski mogyly-kurhany v dolyni Luhani. MDASU, 2008. №8. S. 134–217.

Bratchenko S.N. Pradavnia Slobozhanshchyna: Svativski mogyly-kurhany III tys. do n.e. ta maidany. Materialy ta doslidzhennia z arkheolohii skhidnoi Ukrainy, 2004. № 2. S. 65–190.

Bratchenko S.N., Sanzharov S.M. Ridkisni bronzovi znariaddia z katakomb Siverskodonechchyny ta Donshchyny (III tys. do n.e.). Luhansk: SNU, 2001. 108 s.

Bratchenko S.N. Nizhnee Podonie v epokhu srednei bronzy Periodizatsiia i khronologiia pamiatnikov. Kiev, 1976. 254 s.

Glebov V.P., Guguev Iu.K. III kurgannyi mogilnik u Aksaiskogo povorota. Trudy arkheologicheskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo biuro. Tom V. Rostov-na-Donu, 2019. S. 25–68.

Ivanova S.V. Istoricheskie rekonstruktsii i arkheologicheskie realii (iamnaia kulturno-istoricheskaia obshchnost). Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho derzhavnoho universytetu, 2004. № 18. S. 330–356.

Iliukov L.S., Kazakov L.M. Kurgany Miusskogo poluostrova. Rostov-na-Donu, 1988. 168 s.

Larenok P.A. Okhrannye raskopki kurgana na territorii bazy proizvodstvennogo obedinenia Krasnyi metallist v g. Rostov-na-Donu 1983 g. Materialy i issledovaniia taganrogskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii. Rostov-na-Donu, 2000. 66 s.

Parusimov I.N. Raskopki kurganov mogilnika Poliakovо. Arkheologicheskie zapiski. 2012. № 4. S. 185–210.

Polidovych Iu.B. Kurhan doby bronzy Rozkopana mohyla poblizu m. Druzhkivka Donetskoi oblasti. Arkheolohichnyi almanakh. 2011. № 25. S. 71–155.

Siniuk A.T., Matveev Iu.P. Srednedonskaia katakombnaia kultura epokhi bronzy po dannym kurgannykh kompleksov. Voronezh, 2007. 220 s.

Smirnov A.M. Kurgany i katakomby epokhi bronzy na Severskom Dontse. Moskva, 1996. 181 s.

Trudy Novocherkasskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii. 2002. №6. 31 s.

Chernykh E.A., Sanzharov S.N., Ryndich A.S., Dubrovskij P.S. Issledovanie kurganov u pos. Shkliar na Severskom Dontse. MDASU. 2013. №12. S. 153–177.

Andr09.12.202509.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Sergii Pustovalov ¹, Nataliya Danylko ²
Burial mounds 2-3 near the village of Volodymyrivka, Skadovsk district, Kherson region
¹Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
²Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-3026-6224
²ORCID: 0000-0003-4667-118X
DOI:

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the republication of the materials from the Red Banner Expedition in the Prysyvashshia region. The previous publication was made in 2018 (Danylko, Chernykh, 2018). The republication is prompted by the fact that the general concept of the Bronze Age periodization in Ukraine used by L. A. Chernykh is outdated and does not take into account modern radiocarbon dates. Moreover, she attempts to question radiocarbon dating, while Europe has long been using the results of this method. In addition, the most important burial in the mentioned publication is presented without proper critical analysis, which leads to a distortion of the actual burial context. In the article by Danylko and Chernykh, the excavation material belongs to N. M. Danylko, whereas the interpretation is by L. A. Chernykh. The mentioned article provides a detailed examination of ceramics and other source studies, but not a single word is said about the social status of the buried individuals. The above requires revisiting these monuments. The article examines 25 burials from the ritual practices and material culture of the Bronze Age in the Prysyvashshia region.

Keywords: kurgans, burials, Bronze Age, Yamnaya culture, Catacomb culture, Srubnaya culture, Cimmerian culture, excavations, social stratification.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Yevdokymov, H. L., Danylko, N.M., Pustovalov, S. Zh. 2025. Burial mounds 2-3 near the village of Volodymyrivka, Skadovsk district, Kherson region.. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Bessonova S.S., Chernykh L.A., Kupryi S.A. 1984. Kurhany u s. Fylatovka. Kurhany Stepnoho Kryma. – Kyev: Naukova dumka s. 41–68.

Boltryk Yu.V. 1987 h. Raskopky kurhanov na Melytopolshchyne. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1985 h. – Moskva: Nauka 306 – 307.

Viazmitina V.O., Illinska V.A., Pokrovska O.F., Terenozhkin O.I., Kovpanenko H.T. 1960. Kurhany bilia s. Novopylypivky ta radhospu “Akkermen”.

Arkheolohichni pamiatky VIII, Akademiia nauk Ukrainskoi RSR. 22 – 135.

Dovzhenko, N.D., Rychkov, N.A. 1988. K probleme sotsyalnoi stratyfykatsyy plemen yamnoi kulturno-istorycheskoi obshchnosty. Novye pamiatnyky yamnoi kultury stepnoi zony Ukrayny. Kyev, Naukova Dumka 27 – 40.

Evdokymov, H.L., Danylko, N.M. 1989. Otchet o rabote Krasnoznamenskoi ekspedytsyy za 1989 hod. Naukovyi arkhiv Instytutu arkheolohii NAN Ukrainy, inv. № 1989/24.

Kovpanenko H.T. 1967. Kurhany v Chaplynskom raione Khersonskoi oblasty// Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. – Leskov A.

M., Merpert N. Ya. (red.) Kyev: Naukova dumka 33- 43.

Kovpanenko, H. T., Kachalova, N. K.Sharafutdynova, Y. N. 1967. Kurhany u s. Novochernomore Khersonskoi oblasty. Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. Leskov A. M., Merpert N. Ya. (red.). Kyev: Naukova dumka 60-81.

Korpusova V.N., Liashko S.N. 1990. Katakombnoe pohrebenye s pshenytsei v Krymu. Sovetskaia arkheolohyia №3 166-175.

Korenevskyi S.N. 1978. O metallycheskykh nozhakh yamnoi, poltavkynskoi y katakombnoi kultur. Sovetskaia arkheolohyia №2 33-48.

Krylova L.P., Kubyshev A.Y., Yaekovenko Э.V. 1967. Kurhany u s. Krasnoe// Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. Leskov A. M., Merpert N. Ya. (red.). Kyev: Naukova dumka 53-59.

Kubyshev, A. Y. 1980. Raboty Khersonskoi эkspedytsyy. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1979 h. Moskva: Nauka 292-294.

Kubyshev, A. Y. 1981. Raskopky kurhanov v Prysyvashe. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1980 h M.: Nauka, 270.

Mykhailov, B. D. 1982. Kurhan epokhy bronzy vblyzy Kamennoi Mohyly. Sovetskaia arkheolohyia, 4, 150-156.

Nechytailo, A. L., Buniatian, E. P. Kurhannaia hruppa u s. Chkalovo. 1984. Kurhany Stepnoho Kryma. Korpusova V. Y. (red.). Kyev: Naukova dumka 6-40.

Otroshchenko V.V. 1993. “Zhrecheskye” kompleksy v systeme pohrebenyi srubnoi obshchnosty. Arkheolohichni ta istorychni doslidzhennia Khersonshchyny. Kherson s. 17-31.

Pustovalov S.Zh. 1992. Etnycheskaia struktura katakombnoho naselenyia Severnoho Prychernomoria. Kyev, Naukova dumka.

Pustovalov, S.Zh. 2005. Sotsialnyi lad katakombnoho suspilstva Pivnichnoho Prychornomoria. Kyiv, Shliakh. Chernenko, E. V., Yakovenko, E. V., Korpusova, V. N. 1967. Raskopky v

okrestnostiakh h. Skadovska. Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. Kyev: Naukova dumka 20-32.

Cherniakov Y.T. Nykytyn V.Y. 1984. Bandurkynskyi klad bronzovoho veka Sovetskaia arkheolohyia №2. 134- 145.

.Shaposhnykova, O. H., Rebedailo, H. P. 1977. Kurhannaia hruppa u s. Novorozanovka. Drevnosty Poynhulia. K. 66-78.

Shaposhnykova, O. H., Bochkarev, V. S. Sharafutdynova, Y. N. 1977. O pamiatnykakh epokhy medy-bronzy v basseine r.Ynhula. Drevnosty Poynhulia. K. 7-36.

Shaposhnykova, O.H. 1987. Epokha ranneho metalla v stepnoi polose Ukrayny Drevneishye skotovody stepei yuha Ukrayny. Kyev:Naukova Dumka 3 - 16.

Shaposhnykova, O. H. 1980. Kurhan u s.Sofyevka. Arkheolohycheskye pamiatnyky Poynhulia. Kyev: Naukova dumka 13-145.

Shaposhnykova, O. H., Sharafutdynova, Y. N., Fomenko, V. N., Dovzhenko, N. D. 1980. Nekotorye itohy izuchenyia pohrebalnykh pamiatnykov epokhy medy-bronzy na r. Ynhul. Arkheolohycheskye pamiatnyky Poynhulia. Kyev: Naukova dumka 5-17.

Shaposhnykova, O. H, Fomenko V.N., Dovzhenko, N. D. 1986. Yamnaia kulturno-istorycheskaia oblast (Yuzhno-buhskyi varyant). Kyev: Naukova dumka.

Shchepinskyi, A. A., Cherepanova, E. N. 1969. Severnoe Prisivashe v V-I tys. do nashei ery. Yn-t arkheolohii. Ministerstvo kultury USSR. Krymskyi kraevedcheskyi muzei. Symferopol: Krym.

Andr09.12.202509.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Hennadii Yevdokymov, Nataliya Danylko ¹, Sergii Pustovalov ²
Archaeological research of the Krasnoznamensk expedition. Burial mounds near the village of Myroliubivka
¹Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
²Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
¹ORCID: 0000-0002-4667-118X
²ORCID: 0000-0003-3026-6224
DOI:

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the publication of excavation materials from the Krasnoznamianska Expedition in the Bilozerka district of Kherson Region, near the village of Myroliubivka (formerly Radianske). In total, materials from 40 burials are presented. Of these, 21 belong to the Yamnaya cultural community; 11 to the Ingul variant of the Catacomb culture; 6 to the Multi-Roller (Multi-Cordoned Ware) culture; 1 Scythian burial and 1 Nogai burial. Among the Yamnaya burials, graves of ordinary population are represented, possibly those of the lower strata of the tribal elite (burials covered with stelae). The Catacomb burials are represented exclusively by the Ingul graves, mostly ordinary catacombs. The Multi-Roller culture burials belong to the Dnipro–Dnister steppe variant and form a compact group in Kurgan 2.

Keywords: Eneolithic-Bronze Age, excavations, Pit graves culture, Ingul culture, multi-roller ornamentation culture.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Yevdokymov, H. L., Danylko, N.M., Pustovalov, S. Zh. 2025. Archaeological research of the Krasnoznamensk expedition. Burial mounds near the village of Myroliubivka.. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Bessonova S.S., Chernykh L.A., Kupryi S.A. 1984. Kurhany u s. Fylatovka. Kurhany Stepnoho Kryma. - Kyev: Naukova dumka s. 41-68.

Boltryk Yu. V. 1987 h. Raskopky kurhanov na Melytopolshchyne. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1985 h. - Moskva: Nauka 306 - 307.

Viazmitina V.O., Illinska V.A., Pokrovska O.F., Terenozhkin O.I., Kovpanenko H.T. 1960. Kurhany bilia s. Novopylypivky ta radhospu “Akkermen”. Arkheolohichni pamiatky VIII, Akademiia nauk Ukrainskoi RSR. 22 - 135.

Evdokymov, H.L., Danylko, N.M. 1989. Otchet o rabote Krasnoznamenskoi ekspedytsyy za 1989 hod. Naukovyi arkhiv Instytutu arkheolohii NAN Ukrainy, inv. № 1989/24.

Klein L.S. Katakombnaia kultura yly katakombnye kultury? Statystyko- kombynatornye metody v arkheolohyy. 1970.- M.: Nauka.- S.165 - 179.

Kovpanenko H.T. 1967. Kurhany v Chaplynskom raione Khersonskoi oblasty. - Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. - Leskov A. M., Merpert N. Ya. (red.) Kyev: Naukova dumka 33- 43.

Korpusova V.N., Liashko S.N. 1990. Katakombnoe pohrebenye s pshenytsei v Krymu. Sovetskaia arkheolohyia №3 166-175.

Krylova L.P., Kubyshev A.Y., Yaekovenko 3.V. 1967. Kurhany u s.

Krasnoe. Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. Leskov A. M., Merpert N. Ya. (red.). Kyev: Naukova dumka 53-59.

Kubyshev, A. Y. 1980. Raboty Khersonskoi akspedytsyy. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1979 h. Moskva: Nauka 292-294.

Kubyshev, A. Y. 1981. Raskopky kurhanov v Prysyvashe. Arkheolohycheskye otkrytyia v 1980 h M.: Nauka, 270.

Litvinenko R.O. 2009. Kulturne kolo Babine. Za materIalami pohovalnih pam’yatok. Avtoreferat na zdobuttya naukovogo stupenyu doktora Istorichnih nauk. KiIv, Mykhailov, B. D. 1982. Kurhan epokhy bronzy vblyzy Kamennoi Mohyly. Sovetskaia arkheolohyia, 4, 150-156.

Nechytailo, A. L., Buniatian, E. P. Kurhannaia hruppa u s. Chkalovo. 1984. Kurhany Stepnoho Kryma. Korpusova V. Y. (red.). Kyev: Naukova dumka 6-40.

Pustovalov S.Zh. 1992. Etnycheskaia struktura katakombnoho naselenyia Severnoho Prychernomoria. Kyev, Naukova dumka.

Pustovalov, S.Zh. 2005. Sotsialnyi lad katakombnoho suspilstva Pivnichnoho Prychornomoria. Kyiv, Shliakh.

Chernenko, E. V., Yakovenko, E. V., Korpusova, V. N. 1967. Raskopky v okrestnostiakh h. Skadovska. Pamiatnyky epokhy bronzy yuha Evropeiskoi chasty SSSR. Kyev: Naukova dumka 20-32.

Shaposhnykova O.H.Katakombnaia kulturno-istorycheskaia oblast. 1969. rigini. III. - Rome.- 85-118.

Shaposhnykova, O. H., Rebedailo, H. P. 1977. Kurhannaia hruppa u s. Novorozanovka. Drevnosty Poynhulia. K. 66-78.

Shaposhnykova, O. H., Bochkarev, V. S. Sharafutdynova, Y. N. 1977. O pamiatnykakh epokhy medy-bronzy v basseine r.Ynhula. Drevnosty Poynhulia. K. 7-36.

Shaposhnykova, O.H. 1987. Epokha ranneho metalla v stepnoi polose Ukrayny. Drevneishye skotovody stepei yuha Ukrayny. Kyev:Naukova Dumka 3 - 16.

Shaposhnykova, O. H. 1980. Kurhan u s. Sofyevka. Arkheolohycheskye pamiatnyky Poynhulia. Kyev: Naukova dumka 13-145.

Shaposhnykova, O. H, Fomenko V.N., Dovzhenko, N. D. 1986. Yamnaia kulturno-istorycheskaia oblast (Yuzhno-buhskyi varyant). Kyev: Naukova dumka.

Shchepinskyi, A. A., Cherepanova, E. N. 1969. Severnoe Prisivashe v V-I tys. do nashei ery. Yn-t arkheolohii. Ministerstvo kultury USSR. Krymskyi kraevedcheskyi muzei. Symferopol: Krym.

Andr08.12.202509.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Ivan Prudko¹
Grey Clay Amphora Containing a Hoard of Dolphins from Olbia : a new addition to the collections of the Archaeological Museum at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0009-0005-0833-3437
DOI:

ABSTRACT

The article introduces into scholarly circulation a new addition to the collections of the Archaeological Museum of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv—a grey-clay amphora containing a hoard of dolphin-shaped coins, accidentally discovered within the chora of ancient Olbia. Despite the loss of most of the complex and the absence of archaeological context due to the actions of “amateur searchers,” the author provides a detailed description of the preserved items—the amphora and eight bronze cast ingots in the form of “dolphins.” The study outlines the morphological features of the vessel and the coins, presents their measurements, and offers relevant analogies. The article highlights the scholarly value of the complex while also demonstrating the challenges of working with antiquities removed illegally, which lose much of their informational potential when proper contextual recording is lacking.

Keywords: antiquity, Olbia, hoard, numismatics, Olbian dolphin.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Prudko, I. V. 2025. Grey Clay Amphora Containing a Hoard of Dolphins from Olbia : a new addition to the collections of the Archaeological Museum at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Fakty. Zolotyi mech i amfora: na Zaporizhzhi znajshly pokhovannia skifskoho voina [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://fakty.com.ua/ua/ukraine/20190927-zolotyj-mech-i-amfora-na-zaporizhzhi-znajshly-pohovannya-skifskogo-voyina/

Anokhyn V. A. Antichnye monety Severnogo Prychernomorʹia. Kyiv: Stylos, 2011. 328 s.

Chystov D. E., Ilʹina Yu. I., Eremeeva A. A., Shcherbakova O. E. 2020. Materialy Berezanskoi (Nyzhnebugsʹkoi) antychnoi arkheolohichnoi ekspedytsii. T. 3: Berezanske poselennia v doslidzhenniakh 2010–2014 rokiv. SPb.: Izd-vo Hos. Ermitazha, 436 s.

Skudnova V. M. 1988. Arkhaicheskiy nekropolʹ Olvii. L.: Iskusstvo, 184 s.

061 – sait mista Zaporizhzhia. 2019. Zaporozhskie arkheologi nashli zolotoy mech i unikalʹnuiu amforu, – FOTOREPORTAZH [online]. Rezhym dostupu: https://www.061.ua/news/2524688/zaporozskie-arheologi-nasli-zolotoj-mec-i-unikalnuu-amforu-fotoreportaz

Andr08.12.202509.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Nadiia Kravchenko¹
Hunting in museum exhibitions of the german Saxony: artefacts of material culture, works of art, environmental protection context
¹National military history museum of Ukraine
¹ORCID: 0000-0001-9739-4859
DOI:

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the study of the representation of hunting in the museum exhibits of Saxony. Since the culture of hunting was very developed in the German states in the Early Modern Period, its artefacts occupy a prominent place among museum items.

With the rethinking of the attitude towards the environment, the popularity of environmental movements has led to significant changes in museum exhibitions about hunting. While in the past they were aimed at demonstrating the results of successful hunts, now they have a pronounced natural history orientation. Hunting palaces turned museums now have a rather different goal - to show hunting as a part of an everyday life of past ages. The variety of abovementioned artefacts, the ways in which they are displayed, and understanding their place within the framework of German exhibition projects deserve separate coverage. Its results may be useful for employees of Ukrainian museum institutions who are planning to rework exhibitions of natural history departments.

Within the framework of this small study, a conditional division of museums was created, between those where hunting is present as one of the topics of a permanent exhibition or temporary exhibition, and those centered on depicting the history of hunting from a certain angle. The exhibitions of the State Art Collection in Dresden, Hartenfels Castle, Königstein Fortress contain artefacts related to the history of hunting and its reflection in art. Indirectly, this topic was present in the conceptual exhibition project dedicated to memories, which took place in the Hubertusburg hunting castle in 2023. A holistic image of hunting in the Baroque era is presented in the Moritzburg Palace museum. On the other hand, the expositions of the Augustusburg and Lauenstein castles are aimed at presenting the history of hunting in the past, as well as the ecological component of nature management.

Keywords: hunting, museums, Germany, Saxony, art, weapons, Meissen porcelain, 16th-18th centuries.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Kravchenko, N. V. 2025. Hunting in museum exhibitions of the german Saxony: artefacts of material culture, works of art, environmental protection context. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Kravchenko N. 2021. Myslyvstvo v ekspozytsiiakh ukrains'kykh muzeiv: istoriia ta suchasnist'. Naukovyj visnyk Natsional'noho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy. Materialy schorichnoi naukovoi konferentsii Natsional'noho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy (2020 r.): statti, publikatsii, povidomlennia, 7, s. 208-217 (in Ukrainian).

Delang, S. 2008. Schloss Hartenfels in Torgau. Leipzig: Ed. Leipzig.

Giermann, R. 1993. Die Geweihsammlung Augusts des Starken im Schloß Moritzburg. Moritzburg: Schloß Moritzburg.

Giermann R. 1999. Sehnsucht nach Arkadien : die Monumentalmalereien August des Starken im Schloss Moritzburg. Dresden: Druckhaus.

Giermann R. 2009. Meissener Porzellan im Schloss Moritzburg : vom Heiligen Hubertus und einem Tête-à-Tête. Dresden: Sandstein.

Kirsten M. 1999. Schloß Augustusburg. München [u.a.]: Dt. Kunstverlag.

Kunze J. 2019. König Albert und das Alte Jagdschloss zu Wermsdorf. Beucha; Markkleeberg: Sax-Verlag.

Meltzer, G. 2018. Lauenstein - eine Bergstadt mit Geschichte : ein Begleitheft zum Historischen Pfad durch Lauenstein und gleichzeitig der Versuch einer kurzgefassten Chronik der ehemaligen Bergstadt. [Altenberg]: Im Eigenverlag des Osterzgebirgsmuseums Schloss Lauenstein.

Pietsch U. [hrsg.]. 2005. Porzellan Parforce : jagdliches Meißner Porzellan des Jahrhunderts. München: Hirmer.

Pietsch U. [hrsg.]. 2010. Triumph of the Blue Swords : Meissen porcelain for aristocracy and bourgeoisie 1710 – 1815. Leipzig: Seemann Henschel.

Reiterer E. M. 1995. Tradition ist geerbte Vernunft (Jagdgeschichte für alle). In: Łowiectwo w tradycji i kulturze : międzynarodowe sympozjum, Pułtusk'94 = La chasse dans la tradition et la culture = Die Jagd in der Tradition und Kultur. Warszawa : Łowiec Polski.

Roth H. 1992. Vom Jagen. Moritzburg: Museum Schloß Moritzburg.

Schöbel J., Schaal D. 1987. Historisches Museum. Dresden: Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden.

Syndram D. [hrsg]. 2013. Die königliche Jagdresidenz Hubertusburg und der Frieden von 1763. [Dresden]: Ed. Sächsische Zeitung.

Säuberlich E. (Bearb.). 2006. 800 Jahre Wermsdorf [1. Aufl.]. Beucha: Sax-Verlag.

Willkomm H.-D. [Verf.]. 2020. Jagdschlösser im Osten Deutschlands : Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Brandenburg/Berlin, Sachsen-Anhalt, Sachsen und Thüringen ; ein Reiseführer. Grevesmühlen: NWM-Verlag.

Wittwer, S. 2000. Ein königlicher Tiergarten : Tiere aus Meißner Porzellan. Zwolle: Waanders.

Andr13.11.202508.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Anna Radchenko¹, Simon Radchenko ²
Archaeology on paper: scientific professional publications in Ukraine and whst is (not) happening to them
¹PH “Akademperiodyka” of the NAS of Ukraine
²Museum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger
¹ORCID: 0000-0002-0276-6398
²ORCID: 0000-0003-2970-5373
DOI:

ABSTRACT

The paper examines the three most highly ranked periodical publishing bodies dealing with Ukraine's archaeological content — Arheologia, Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine, and EMINAK. Focusing on academic papers as the main way to present research outcomes, it provides a scientometric study of these periodicals to examine processes in Ukrainian archaeology to the extent they are expressed in publications. The paper perceives scientometric research as a reliable way to spot internal and external trends of the journal, and compare them to their analogies in the publishing bodies abroad, tracing the directions for future modification and development.

We applied conventional and self-developed tools to perform a coherent study of Ukrainian journals, revealing trends and approaches in authorship, thematic choices, and titling creativity of published papers. These methods showed a coherence and fascination in material-based study and material publication of Ukrainian journals, especially compared to European ones. Moreover, a comparatively low level of titling creativity emphasizes the undertheorization of the data and an established tradition to focus on empirical work instead of the interpretational publication. In contrast to the European writing model, Ukrainian authors follow a fixational approach to presenting material instead of analytical and synthetic. In addition, the metadata are often selected in order to exclude external readers rather than include them, as European scholars aim to do.

This paper draws the connection between such state of the art, the low quantity of theoretical and methodological research in Ukraine, and the relatively low topicality of academic papers published by Ukrainian archaeologists in their domestic periodicals. We claim that the absence of consistent and rigorous theoretical work affects the overall level of scholarly publishing in Ukrainian archaeology and leads to an increase in the thematic and methodological gap between Ukrainian and European archaeology. Moreover, in our view, this is a symptom of social unawareness and passivity of Ukrainian archaeology as a discipline, which might lead to severe empiricism and problems for the field shortly. In the paper's final part, we provide some general reflections on the matter and advice on how Ukrainian archaeological academic journals can contribute to overcoming the current crisis.

Keywords: scientometric analysis, bibliometrics, peer-reviewed journal, citation, word frequency, science theory, archaeology.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Radchenko, A.I., Radchenko, S.B. 2025. Archaeology on paper: scientific professional publications in Ukraine and whst is (not) happening to them. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Bibliometriia: Leidenskyi manifest dlia naukometrii. 2017. Filosofska dumka, 6, 93-98 (in Ukrainian).

Velenteichyk, T.M., Radchenko, A.I., Mryglod, O.I. 2023. A Scientometric Study of “Science and Science of Science” Journal: to the 30th Anniversary of the Edition. Nauka naukozn, 3 (121), 5-40 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2023.03.005

Zalizniak, L.L. 2019. Ukrainska arkheolohiia: stan i perspektyvy (subiektyvne vrazhennia pro obiektyvnyi stan). ADIU, 4. 388-395 (in Ukrainian).

Kotlyarevsky, Ya.V., Radchenko, A.I., Melnikov, O.V., Semenyuk, E.P. 2018. Strategic priorities in measuring the publication and publishing works in scholarly research activity. Sci. innov., 14 (5), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine14.05.005

Minakov, M.A., Radchenko, S.B. 2024. The structure of archaeological knowledge and the concept of archaeological culture: the perspective of actor-network theory. Arheologia, 4, 104-124. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2024.04.104

Palyenko, S.V. 2016. V.F. Henynh y formyrovanye kyevskoho tsentra teoretycheskoi arkheolohyy. Kratkie soobshchenyia Instytuta arkheolohyy 242, 232-243 (in Russian).

Radchenko, A., Radchenko, S. 2024. «Arheologia» of Ukraine: creativity, monopolization and scientometric analysis. Arheologia, in print (in Ukrainian).

Radchenko, S., Radchenko, A. 2024. Archaeology on paper: scientific publications in Ukraine and what is (not) happening to them. Abstracts. International Scientific Conference "Archaeology, museum and monument studies in education and research" (October 3-4, 2024, Kyiv, Ukraine, AMMS 2024), 42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14203344

Radchenko, A.I. 2018. “Notes of the Ukrainian Mineralogical Society”: History and Perspectives. Proc. Ukrainian Mineral. Society, 15, 19-28 (in Ukrainian).

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2018. How to assess how wide is an audience of a periodical. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 9, 73-82 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2018.09.073

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2019. Monopolization of Section of Chemical and Biological Sciences of the NAS of Ukraine periodicals. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 10, 63-69 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2019.10.063

Radchenko, А.І., Koval, N.V. 2020. Journals of NAS of Ukraine in physical, engineering and mathematical sciences: monopolization level. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 11, 51-58 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2020.11.051

Radchenko, А.I., Mryglod, O.I. 2019. “Mineralogical Journal (Ukraine)”: 40 Years of History. Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), 41 (1), 3-14 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.41.01.003

González-Ruibal, A., ed., 2013. Reclaiming archaeology. Beyond the tropes of modernity. London: Routledge, 392 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068632

Greenberg, R., Hamilakis, Y., 2023. Archaeology, coloniality and modernity: a response. Forum Kritische Archäologie, 12, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41380

Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; de Rijcke, Sarah; Rafols, Ismael. 2015. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520 (7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Radchenko, S. 2024. Are We Metamodern? The Structure of Today’s Archaeology from the Perspective of Cultural Studies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 57 (2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2025.2452292

Radchenko, S., Radchenko, A. 2024. Ukrainian archaeological theory outside of the garden wall. Presentation at the Nordic TAG 2024 Conference, Turku, March 6—8, 2024. URL: https://sites.utu.fi/nordictag2024/wp-content/uploads/sites/1259/2024/03/NordicTAG-2024-Abstract-book-UPDATED.pdf

Andr13.11.202508.12.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Yaroslav Volodarets-Urbanovych¹
Early Medieval Jewelry from the Kherson Local History Museum : stolen heritage
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-1560-3608

DOI:

ABSTRACT

The report presents information about a number of archaeological finds of early Middle Ages from funds and exposition of the Kherson Local History Museum. This jewellery entered the museum’s collection in different years. It was possible to author to get acquainted with these materials in 2018 and 2019. A part was published almost immediately, others later — during 2024 and 2025. Work on processing part of the collection was stopped by the global Covid-2019 pandemic. And on February 24, 2022, a full-scale invasion of russian troops began, including in the south of Ukraine, with the occupation of Kherson. In November 2022, during the robbery by the russian occupiers of the Kherson Local History Museum, a number of items (including jewellery of the early Middle Ages) were taken in an unknown direction. Their further fate is unknown.

All archaeological finds can be divided into four groups according to ethnocultural affiliation and general dating.

Аnthropomorphic pendant from «Oleshkovsky Pіski» (Fig. 2; 3). Archaeological find belongs to the circle of «Black Sea-Caucasian» pendants of Alans or Bulgarians, it under discussion could be dated to the 4th— 7thcc. It entered the collection of Viktor Goshkevich (the founder and funder of the museum) back in 1900 or 1905.
Finds of strap adornments by «Heraldic» style (second half of the 6th— 7thcc.) from three points — Novooleksiivka, Novochornomor’ia and Kalanchak (Fig. 4—7), in total of 12 archaeological finds. This jewellery entered the museum’s collection in the 1960s and early 1970s, thanks to the works of Israel Ratner (an employee-archaeologist of the museum).
Buckle of early Byzantine time from Heroiske village (Fig. 8). This find belongs to the circle of very famous produces of the «Syracuse» type. Similar buckles date back to the last quarter of the 6th— 7thcc. This jewel also entered the museum’s collection thanks to the works of Israel Ratner.
Jewellery findings from Pravi Solontsi Hoard, which belongs to the assemblages of the Martynivka circle. The complex comprises 20 whole and fragmented metal items and 1 bead of nontranslucent glass (Fig. 9; 10). The items existed in starting from the end of the 6th/ turn of the 6th—7th cc. to the middle / third quarter of the 7th c.

The report presents the most complete information about those finds that have been processed and data about which may be lost. It should be hoped that attracting the attention of the world public and the work of the relevant services will be able to return the stolen heritage of Ukraine during the full-scale invasion, including from the collection of the Kherson Local History Museum.

Keywords: The Kherson Local History Museum, Early Middle Ages, Slavs, nomads, jewelry.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Y.V. 2025. Early Medieval Jewelry from the Kherson Local History Museum : stolen heritage. VITA ANTIQUA,16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

References:

Aibabin, A. I. 1990. Khronologiia mogilnikov Kryma pozdnerimskogo i rannesrednevekovogo vremeni. Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii, I, s. 3-86, 175-241.

Veimarn, E. V., Aibabin, A. I. 1993. Skalistinskii mogilnik. Kiev: Naukova dumka.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2014. Pronyzky epokhy rannoho serednovichchia zi slov’ianskykh pam’iatok pivdnia Skhidnoi Yevropy. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 2 (13), s. 35-49.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2024. Vizantiiska priazhka typu «Syrakuzy» iz Heroiskoho yak marker kulturnykh kontaktiv. Skhodoznavstvo, 94, s. 3-28. https://doi.org/10.15407/skhodoznavstvo2024.94.003.

Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2025. Znakhidky detalei reminnykh ozdob «heraldychnoho» stylia rannoho serednovichchia iz kolektsii Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu. Arkheolohiia, 3, s. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2025.03.052.

Volodarets-Urbanovich, IA. V., Ganoshchenko, V. V. 2020. Antropomorfnaia podveska iz sobraniia Khersonskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia. Prinosi kiem Bielgarskata arkheologiia, X, s. 5-22.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1996a. Detali remennoi garnitury. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 22-36.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1996b. Datirovka dneprovskikh kladov pervoi gruppy metodom sinkhronizatsii s drevnostiami drugikh territorii. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. (red.). Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 58-95.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 1999. V-obraznye priazhki, izgotovlennye vmeste s shchitovidnoi oboimoi. V: Ivanov, A. G. (red.). Permskii mir v rannem srednevekove. Archaeologia Permica, I. Izhevsk: Udmurtskii in-t istorii, iaz. i lit. UrO RAN, s. 160-209.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 2001. Evoliutsiia vostochnoevropeiskikh psevdopriazhek. V: Stashenkov, D. A. (red.). Kultury Evraziiskikh stepei vtoroi poloviny I tysiacheletiia n. e. 2. Samara, s. 31-86.

Gavritukhin, I. O. 2004. Srednedneprovskie ingumatsii vtoroi poloviny V—VI v. V: Goriunova, V. M., Shcheglova, O. A. (red.). Kulturnye transformatsii i vzaimovliianiia v Dneprovskom regione na iskhode rimskogo vremeni i v rannem Srednevekove. Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, s. 208-220.

Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. 1996. Dneprovskoe Levoberezhe na zare srednevekovia: dinamika istoriko-kulturnykh protsessov i klady. V: Gavritukhin, I. O., Oblomskii, A. M. Gaponovskii klad i ego kulturno-istoricheskii kontekst. Ranneslavianskii mir, 3. Moskva, s. 140-148.

Hanoshchenko, V. V., Volodarets-Urbanovych, Ya. V. 2019. Skarb kola Martynivky z Pravykh Solontsiv Khersonskoi oblasti. Arkheolohiia ta davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 32 (3), s. 126-150.

Daskalov, M. 2012. Kolani i kolanni ukrasi ot VI—VII vek (ot dneshna Bulgaria i sasednite zemi). Sofia: Craft House Bulgaria.

Dzneladze, O. 2024. Yuvelirni prykrasy, vkradeni z Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 2 (51), s. 263-273. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2024.02.16.

Zasetskaia, I. P., Kazanskii, M. M., Akhmedov, I. R., Minasian, R. S. 2007. Morskoi Chulek. Pogrebeniia znati iz Priazovia i ikh mesto v istorii plemen Severnogo Prichernomoria v postgunnskuiu epokhu. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha.

Kazanskii, M. M. 2014. Arkheologicheskaia situatsiia v Srednem Podneprove v VII v. V: Oblomskii, A. M. (red.). Problemy vzaimodeistviia naseleniia Vostochnoi Evropy v epokhu Velikogo pereseleniia narodov. Ranneslavianskii mir, 15. Moskva, s. 138-177.

Kazanskii, M. M. 2020. Drevnosti stepnykh kochevnikov postgunskogo vremeni (seredina V — seredina VI v.) v Vostochnoi Evrope. Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii, XXV, s. 90-167.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 1979. Poiasnye nabory Evrazii IV—IX vv. Priazhki. Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov, E1-02. Moskva: Nauka.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 1983. Antropomorfnye amulety VI—IX vv. na Severnom Kavkaze. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii, 176, s. 43-50.

Kovalevskaia, V. B. 2000. Kompiuternaia obrabotka massovogo arkheologicheskogo materiala iz rannesrednevekovykh pamiatnikov Evrazii. Pushchino: ONTI PNTS RAN.

Komar, A. V. 2006. Pereshchepinskii kompleks v kontekste osnovnykh problem istorii i kultury kochevnikov Vostochnoi Evropy VII — nachala VIII v. Stepi Evropy v epokhu srednevekovia, 5: Khazarskoe vremia, s. 7-244, 413-432.

Komar, A. V. 2013. Kochevniki vostochnoevropeiskikh stepei vtoroi poloviny VI — pervoi poloviny VIII v. V: Dosymbaeva, A., Zholdasbekov, M. (red.). Zapadnyi Tiurkskii kaganat. Atlas. Astana: «Service Press», s. 671-821.

Kostenko, A. 2019. Izrail Ratner. Zhyve slovo chasovi nepidvladne. Kherson.

Musiiko, V. V. 2023. Peredmova. V: Honcharova, O. S. (red.). Nenaukovi zapysky: spohady spivrobitnykiv Khersonskoho oblasnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu pro okupatsiiu mista. Mykolaiv, s. 4-8.

Oblomskii, A. M., Rodinkova, V. E. 2014. Etnokulturnyi perelom v Podneprove v VII v. n. e. Khronologiia sobytii. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii, 235, s. 381-404.

Ratner, I. D. 1984. Dovidnyk z arkheolohii Ukrainy. Khersonska oblast. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Ratner, I. D., Kostiuk, L. I. 1989. Drevnosti Khersonshchiny. Simferopol: Tavriia.

Rashev, R. 2000. Prabalgarite prez V—VII vek. V. Tarnovo: Faber.

Rodinkova, V. E. 2003. Kulturnye sviazi naseleniia Srednego Podneprovia v VII v. (po materialam zhenskogo ubora). Dissertatsiia k. i. n.

Rodinkova, V. E. 2012. Novaia nakhodka vizantiiskogo serebrianogo sosuda s kleimom v Vostochnoi Evrope. Rossiiskaia arkheologiia, 4, s. 151-158.

Rodinkova, V. E., Sedin, A. A. 2004. Braslety Nikodimovskogo gorodishcha. V: Makarov, N. A., Chernetsov, A. V., Lopatin, N. V. (red.). Vostochnaia Evropa v Srednevekove: K 80-letiiu Valentina Vasilevicha Sedova. Moskva: Nauka, s. 234-246.

Sikoza, D., Dzneladze, O., Symonenko, O. 2025. Dachi — kompleks doby Velykoho Pereselennia Narodiv z Khersonshchyny. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 54 (2), s. 154—160. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2025.02.10.

Skyba, A. V. 2016. Poiasni nabory heraldychnoho styliu u slov’ian. Kyiv: Instytut arkheolohii NANU.

Skyba, A. V., Khardaiev, V. M. 2017. Poiasni harnitury z kochivnytskykh kompleksiv v kolektsii Muzeiu istorychnykh koshtovnostei Ukrainy (filialu Natsionalnoho muzeiu istorii Ukrainy). V: Skyba, A. V., Horbanenko, S. A. (red.). Yevropeiska arkheolohiia I tysiacholittia n. e.: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats na chest Liany Vasylivny Vakulenko. Kyiv, s. 221-236.

Traykova, L. A. 2017. Kolanat yuzhno ot dolen Dunav — kraya na ІІІ — nachaloto na VІІ v. Sofia.

Shelov, D. B. 1984. Antropomorfnyi amulet iz Tanaisa. V: Meliukova, A. I., Moshkova, M. G., Petrenko, V. G. (red.). Drevnosti Evrazii v skifo-sarmatskoe vremia. Sbornik statei. Moskva: Nauka, s. 241-246.

Schulze-Dörrlamm, M. 2002. Byzantinische Gürtelschnallen und Gürtelbeschläge im Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum. I: Die Schnallen ohne Beschläg, mit Laschenbeschläg und mit festem Beschläg des 5.—7. Jahrhunderts. Kataloge Vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Altertümer, 30. Mainz.

Andr06.11.202506.11.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Sofia Syvuk¹
Roman Metal Tableware in the Chernyakhiv Culture of Ukraine : a historiographical overview
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0009-0001-2945-3623

DOI:

ABSTRACT

The article presents an attempt at a comprehensive analysis of the history of studying Roman metal vessels from sites of the Chernyakhiv culture within the territory of Ukraine. Particular attention is devoted to the clarification of the terminological framework, the definition and characterization of the main stages in the accumulation of the source base, as well as to the identification of the specific features of its formation and the dynamics of artifact discovery.

Special attention is given to the analysis of chronological aspects, the examination of the historical context, and the discussion of the functional purpose of Roman metal vessels in the barbarian milieu. In particular, the so-called “princely burials” are analyzed as examples illustrating the formation of the “drinking set” characteristic of the Chernyakhiv culture, which reflects processes of adaptation and reinterpretation of Roman traditions within the material culture of the barbarian societies of the Northern Black Sea region.

The paper also presents an up-to-date list of known examples of Roman metal vessels associated with the Chernyakhiv culture, mentioned in the works of both Ukrainian and foreign researchers. The conclusion analyzes the current state of research, identifies the main trends in the development of scholarly approaches, and outlines the prospects for further studies on this topic.

Keywords: Roman import, metal utensils, late Roman period, Chernyakhiv culture, historiography.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Syvuk, S.O. 2025. Roman Metal Tableware in the Chernyakhiv Culture of Ukraine : a historiographical overview. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Braichevskyi, M. 1968. Istoriia vyvchennia cherniakhivskoi kultury. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukrainskii RSR, 1, s. 213—238.

Hereta, I. 1976. Zvit pro arkheolohichni doslidzhennia u Chernelevi-Ruskomu v 1976 r. Naukovyi arkhiv IA NANU, 1976/51.

Hereta, I. 1994. Zvit pro arkheolohichni doslidzhennia u Chernelevi-Ruskomu v 1994 r. Naukovyi arkhiv IA NANU, 1994/90.

Gereta, I. 2013.Chernelevo-Ruskyi mohylnyk / upor. V.S. Tylishchak. OIUM, 3, Kyiv, Ternopil: TzOV “Terno-hraf”.

Levada, M. 2003. Mohylnyk Cherepashyntsi: sproba arkhivnoi rekonstruktsii doslidzhen arkheolohichnoi pamiatky. Pamiatky Ukrainy, 4, s. 12–19.

Mahomedov, B. 2010. Znakhidky predmetiv rymskoho importu z metalu na cherniakhivskykh pamiatkakh Ukrainy. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 2, s. 174-182.

Mahomedov, B. 2003. Potoibichnyi benket u pokhovalnomu obriadi cherniakhivskoi kultury. Starozhytnosti I tysiacholittia nashoi ery na terytorii Ukrainy, s. 83—88.

Mahomedov, B. 1997. Pokhovalni sporudy yak oznaka sotsialnoho statusu v cherniakhivskomu suspilstvi. Problemy pokhodzhennia ta istorychnoho rozvytku slovian, s. 79–85.

Mahomedov, B. 1992. Velyka Snitynka 2 — poselennia hrebinnykiv III—IV st. n. e. Starodavnie vyrobnytstvo na terytorii Ukrainy, s. 94–116.

Mahomedov, B., Levada, M. 1993. Rozkopky cherniakhivskoho mohylnyka v s. Petrykivtsi. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, s. 80–81.

Nadvirniak O., Pohorilets O. 2014. Novi znakhidky bronzovykh kazaniv typu Hemmor na Podilli. Cherniakhivska kultura: do 120-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia V.P. Petrova. OIUM, 4, s. 151–155.

Onyshchuk, Y. 2010. Provintsiino-rymski kulturni vplyvy ta yikh rol v etnichnii istorii Volyno-Podilskoho pohranychchia. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, s. 152–159.

Petrauskas O., Hopkalo, O., Horbanenko, S. 2016. Vstup. Cherniakhivska kultura: do 85-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia I. S. Vynokura, Ouim, 5, s. 7—10.

Petrauskas, O., Koval, O., Pohorilets, O., Nadvirniak, O. 2020. Arkheolohichni rozvidky z veryfikatsii mistseznakhodzhen rymskykh importiv na ob`iektakh cherniakhivskoi kultury Pivdennoho Pobuzhzhia (roboty 2014 r). DIKZ «Mezhybizh». Arkheolohichni chytannia. Materialy 2016–2020 rr., 1– 2, s. 84-88.

Petrauskas, O., Nadvirniak, O., Pohorilets, O., 2023. Kazanky typu Khemmoor z terytorii Ukrainy (kataloh). Oium, 7, Kyiv-Khmelnytskyi: IA NAN Ukrainy

Syvuk, S. 2024. Istoriia vyvchennia rymskykh importiv cherniakhivskoi kultury terytorii Ukrainy: stan rozrobky temy. V: Shydlovskyi, P. S. (red.). Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia «Arkheolohiia, muzeieznavstvo ta pamiatkoznavstvo v systemi osvity ta nauky», s. 37-38.

Symonovych, E. 1980. «Kniazivski» pokhovannia cherniakhivskoi kultury. Tez. dop. V Podilskoi istoryko-kraieznavchoi konferentsii, s. 128–130.

Strotsen, B. 2008. Cherniakhivska kultura Zakhidnoho Podillia. Ternopil: Aston.

Shchepachenko, V. 2024. Sotsialno ekonomichnyi rozvytok naselennia piznorymskoho chasu – pochatku doby Velykoho pereselennia narodiv na terytorii Ukrainy: za materialamy sklianoho posudu cherniakhivskoi kultury. Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia stupenia doktora filosofii za spetsialnistiu 032 – Istoriia ta arkheolohiia. KhNU im. V.N. Karazina MON Ukrainy.

Varachyova, K. 2011. Mesto steklyannyh i glinyanyh kubkov v «servize» pogrebenij na mogilnikah chernyahovskoj kultury dnepro-doneckoj lesostepi. Oium, 1, s 61–65.

Gereta, I. 1989. Novye mogilniki Chernyahovskoj kultury Zapadnoj Podolii i velbarskaya kultura, Kul. wielb., s. 283-297.

Gopkalo, O., Milashevskij, O. 2017. O soderzhanii rannego etapa kulturi Chernyahov-Sintana-De-Muresh. Rannij zheleznyj vek ot rubezha er do serediny I tys. n.e. Dinamika osvoeniya kulturnogo prostranstva, s. 44–46.

Gopkalo, O. 2011. Otnositelnaya hronologiya muzhskih pogrebenij chernyahovskoj kultury. K postanovke problemy. Oium, 1, s. 66–96.

Gopkalo, O., Tilishak, V. 2010. Rimskie importy iz metalla na mogilnike Cherneliv-Russkij. Germania-Sarmatia, 2, s. 78-95.

Gorohovskij, E. 1988. Hronologiya chernyahovskih mogilnikov Lesostepnoj Ukrainy. Trudy V Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa arheologov-slavistov, 4, s. 34-46.

Kravchenko, N. 1987. O metodike sociologicheskogo analiza pogrebalnogo obryada chernyahovskoj kultury. Issledovanie socialno-istoricheskih problem v arheologii, s. 209–227.

Kravchenko, N. 1967. Kosanovskij mogilnik (za materialami raskopok V.P. Petrova i N.M. Kravchenko. MIA. 139, s. 77–135.

Kropotkin, V. 1967. Ekonomicheskie svyazi Vostochnoj Evropy v I tysyacheletii nashej ery. AN SSSR, In-t arheologii. M.: Nauka.

Kropotkin, V. 1970. Rimskie importnye izdeliya v Vostochnoj Evrope (II v. do n.e. - V v. n.e.). M.: Nauka, 222 s.

Kuharenko, Y. 1980. Mogilnik Brest-Trishin. Moskva: Nauka.

Magomedov, B. 2001. Chernyahovskaya kultura. Problema etnosa. Lublin: UMCS. Monumenta Studia Gothica,1, 276 s.

Nikulice, I., Rikman, E. 1973. Mogilnik Hanska—Luteriya pervyh stoletij nashej ery. Kratkie soobsheniya Instituta arheologii, 133, s. 116—123.

Pucko, V. 1984. Serebryanye kuvshiny iz Zhigajlovki. Vesnik drevnej istorii, 4, s. 77–89.

Tretyakov, P. 1966. Finno-ugry, balty i slavyane na Dnepre i Volge. Leningrad: Nauka.

Petrauskas, O., Syvolap, M. 2022. The Momstrous (Monstruoso) Fibula from the Dnipro River region. Lietuvos Archeologija, 48, p. 265–284.

Wielowajski, J. 1988. Studies of Roman metal vessels during the last decade (1976–1985). Archaeologia Polona, 27, p. 15-67.

Bemmann, J. 2014. Mitteldeutschland und das Gallische Sonderreich 260-274: Eine liebgewonnene These auf dem Prüfstand. Kölner Jahrbuch, 47, S. 179–213.

Bienert, B. 2007. Die römischen Bronzegefäße im Rheinischen Landesmuseum Trier. Trierer Zeitschrift, 31. Trier: Rheinisches Landes museum.

Bierbrauer, V. 1989. Ostgermanische oberschichtgräber der römischen Keiserzeit und des frühen Mittelalters. Archeologia Baltica, 8, S. 38–106.

Eggers, H. 1951. Der römische Import im freien Germanien. Atlas der Urgeschichte, 1, Hamburg: Hamburgisches Museum für Völkerkunde und Vorgeschichte.

Eggers, H. 1955. Zur absoluten Chronologie der römischen Kaiserzeit im Freien Germanien. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 2, S. 196-244.

Kokowski, A. 2001. Ein sogenanntes «Fürstengrab» von Rudka in Wolhynien (Seine Bedeutung für die Rekonstruktion des Bildes der germanischen Eliten im späten Altertum). In: Storgaard, B. (ed.). Military Aspects of the aristocracy in Barbaricum in the Roman and Early Migration. Publications from The National Museum Studies in Archaeology & History, 5, S. 41-53.

Kokowski, A. 2004. Die Kontakte zwischen der Masłomęcz Gruppe und dem Mitteldonauraum aufgrund der Verbreitung ausgewählter Importe. In: Friesinger, H., Stuppner, A. (eds.). Zen trum und Peripherie — Gesellschaftliche Phänomene in der Frühge schichte. Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission, 57, Wienn, S. 177-194.

Levada, M. 2018. Zwei „Bestattungen” vom Gräberfeld Hansca-Lutărie. Studia Barbarica. Profesorowi Adrzejowi Kokowskiemu w 65. rcznicę rodzin, 2, S. 185—204.

Magomedov, B. 2016. Das Fundspektrum römischer Metallsachgüter in der Černjachov-Kultur auf dem Gebiet der Ukraine. In: Voß, H.-U., Müller-Scheeßel, N. (eds.). Archäologie zwischen Römern und Barbaren. Zur Datierung und Verbreitung römischer Metallarbeiten des 2. und 3. Jhs. n. Chr. im Reich und im Barbaricum. Frankfurt am Main: R. Habelt, S. 861-870.

Petersen, E. 1941. Ein reicher gepidischer Grabfund aus Volhynien. Gothiskandza, 3, S. 39-52.

Petrauskas, O. 2021. Neue Funde von Hemmoorer Eimern zwischen Südlichem Bug und Dnister. Zur Typologie und Chronologie. V: E.Sava et al. Die Chronologie der vorrömischen Eisen- und frühen Kaiserzeit in Mittel- und Südosteuropa: Probleme und Perspektiven: Humboldt-Kolleg: Chronologie in den archäologischen Forschungen, Chişinău, Chişinău-Berlin, S. 233-250.

Petrauskas, O., Didenko, S. 2022. Ein Grab mit Hemmoorer Eimer bei Poberežne, Oblast Winnyzja, in der ukrainischen Podillja. Germania, 100, S. 151-198.

Voss, H.-U., Geisler, H., Laser, R. 1994.Corpus der römischen Funde im europäischen Barbaricum. Deutschland. Band 1, Bundesländer Brandenburg und Berlin. Bonn : R. Habelt.

Andr06.11.202513.11.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

Iryna Chechulina¹
The Interaction of Metal and Ceramic Ware in Ancient Greek Culture: Technology, Style and Market Aspects
¹Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
¹ORCID: 0000-0003-3783-6277

DOI:

ABSTRACT

The interaction between ancient Greek metal vessels and Greek ceramic ware is an important aspect of the study of ancient arts and crafts. The metal vases made of bronze, silver and gold produced by ancient Greek craftsmen were not only distinguished by their high craftsmanship, but also had a significant impact on the development of ceramic tableware. The phenomenon of potters imitating Torevtic wares is known not only in Greece, but also in a broader intercultural context, particularly in the Islamic world and China.

Metal vases often served as models for ceramic wares. Potters sought to reproduce the shapes, proportions, and decorative elements of metal vessels in their clay analogues. This was manifested in the use of similar contours and structural elements, for example, in the design of handles, bases and necks of the vessels.

The stylistic elements of metal vases, such as ornaments and motifs, are reflected in the paintings of ceramic ware. The delicate geometric patterns and floral motifs that adorned metal wares were adapted to the technique of ceramic painting. The potters tried to convey the aesthetic value and complexity of metal products through their wares, thus developing new styles and techniques of painting.

The development of technologies and methods for the production of metal vases stimulated technical progress in the manufacture of ceramic ware. The adoption of surface treatment techniques, such as polishing, imitation engraving or the use of fluting, allowed potters to create ware that imitated the shine of metal products.

The socio-economic factor played an important role in this process. Metal vessels were a luxury item available only to the elite, while ceramic analogues allowed a wider audience to join the visual culture of elite objects. Thanks to active trade, Greek ceramics imitating metal spread far beyond Greece, reaching the Northern Black Sea region, Italy, and the Middle East.

Although the main influence was from metal to ceramics, there are cases of the reverse process. Popular ceramic shapes were sometimes reproduced in metal, indicating the interdependence of different craft traditions.

Thus, the interplay between metal vases and ceramic tableware in Ancient Greece is an example of the integration of different craft traditions, which contributed to the development of material culture and art. This process reflects the diversity of the ancient Greek society, where different crafts and artistic trends interacted and mutually enriched, creating unique works that still impress with their perfection and artistic value.

Keywords: ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Chechulina, I.O. 2025. The Interaction of Metal and Ceramic Ware in Ancient Greek Culture: Technology, Style and Market Aspects. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.

References:

Andrewes, A., 1991. Greek society. London: Penguin Books.

Boardman, J., 1979. The Athenian pottery trade. The Classical period. Expedition 21, 4, 33-39.

Boardman, J., 1988. Trade in greek decoration pottery. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 7.1, 27-33.

Chechulina, I., 2024. From Athens to Olbia Pontica: the Artistry of Black-Glazed ware. Kyiv: IA NANU.

Coşkun, G., 2011. Achaemenid bowls from Seyitömer Höyük. Olba, 19, 57-79.

Davis, D.L., 2009. Commercial Navigation in the Greek and Roman world. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin.

Furtwängler, A., 1885. Beschreibung der Vasensammlung im Antiquarium. Berlin: Antikensamlung.

Gill, D., 1991. Pots and trade: spacefillers or objects d'art? The Journal of Hellenistic studies, 111, 29-47.

Gill, D., Vickers, M., 1990. Reflected Glory: pottery and precious metal in classical Greece. Jahrbuch des deutschen Archäologisches Instituts, 105, 1-30.

Hayes, J., 1984. Greek and Italian Black-Gloss Wares and Related Wares in the Royal Ontario Museum. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.

Kaba, H., 2022. Comparing the Metal Vessel Acquisition Patterns and Trends of the Thracian and Cypriot Elite during the Classical Period. In: Delev, P. (ed.). Ancient Thrace: Myth and Reality. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Thracology, 1, 191-206.

Kotitsa, Z., 2012. Metal-coated pottery in Macedonia in Late Classical and Hellenistic period. In: Drougou, S, Touratsoglou, I. (Hrsg.), Topics on Hellenistic pottery in ancient Macedonia, 108-125.

Krauskopf, I., 1984. Terrakotta-imitationen der bronzekannen der form Beazley VI in Athen, Westgriechenland und Etrurien. In: Brijder, H.A. (ed.). Ancient Greek and Related Pottery. Proceedings of the International Vase Symposium. Amsterdam: Allard Pierson Museum, p. 83-87.

MacDonald, B.R., 1981. The Emigration of Potters from Athens in the Late Fifth Century B. C. and Its Effect on the Attic Pottery Industry. American Journal of Archaeology, 85. 2, 159-168.

Moller, A., 2008. Classical Greece: Distribution. In: Scheidel, W. (ed.). The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morel, J.-P., 1994. Céramique campanienne: Les formes. Rome: Ecole France.

Mozolevskyi, B.M., 1979. Tovsta Mohyla. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian).

Polyn, S.V., 1992. Ot Skyfyy k Sarmatyy. Kyiv: NANU. (in Russian).

Shefton, B., 1998. Metal and Clay: Prototype and Re-creation. Zoffany's "Tribuna" and Lessons from the Malacena Fabric of Hellenistic Volterra (Calyx-krater, Stamnos, Situla and the Achaemenid Rhython). Revue des Etudes Anciennes, 100-3-4, 619-662.

Sideris, A., 2015. Theseus in Thrace: The Silver Lining on the Clouds of the Athenian-Thracian Relations in the 5th Century BC. Sofia: Thrace Foundation.

Sideris, A., 2024. The Vratsa Situla and the Spread of the Palmette Motif. The Apogee of the Triballian Dynasty: The Triballoi and their Neighbours in the Classical and Early Hellenistic Times. Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Serdicensis, Supplementum VII, 49-69.

Skory, S., Khokhorovsky, Y. 2018. Bolshoi Ryzhanovsky Mound. Kyiv: Oleg Filyuk Publisher (in Russian).

Sparkes, B., 1977. Quintain and the Talcott class. Antike Kunst 20.1, 8-25.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013a. Antychne torhivelne sudno «Zmiinyi-Patrokl» (sklad produktsii). Archeologia, 3, 69-85.

Tereshchenko, O.I. 2013b. Pidvodno-arkheolohichne doslidzhennia antychnoho torhivelnoho sudna poblyzu o. Zmiinyi u Chornomu mori (polovyi sezon 2011 r.). Archeologia, 2, 64-77.

Themelis, P., Touratsoglou, G., 1997. Οι Ταφοι του Δερβενιου (Oi Tafoi toy Derbenioy). Athens.

Vickers, M., 1985. Artful crafts: the influence of metalwork on Athenian painted pottery. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 108-128.

Vickers, M., 2002. Potty prices. Ad Familiares 23, 9-10.

Vickers, M., 2010. Silver, horses and pots. In: Metzler, D. (ed.). Massadifiori. Essays presented to Herbert Hoffmann on his 80th birthday, 351-67.

Zimmermann, N. 1998. Beziehungen zwischen Ton- und Metallgefäßen spätklassischer und frühhellenistischer Zeit. Internationale Archäologie, 20. Leidorf: Rahden/Westf.

Andr06.11.202506.11.2025

VITA ANTIQUA ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research
VITA ANTIQUA 16, 2025, Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations

DOI:

ABSTRACT

Keywords: ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies.

Lenguage: Ukrainian

ПДФ

Cite us:

Chechulina, I.O. 2025. ancient Greek metal vessels, ceramic tableware, Greek ceramics, ancient craft, material culture, production technologies. VITA ANTIQUA, 16. Tangible Heritage of Ancient Times : approaches, contexts, interpretations.