Author: denis

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Innovative Methods in Museum Pedagogics (оn the example of the orphanage “Perlynka”), 180-184

Ivanova Svetlana V.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-180-184
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-180-184
УДК: 069:37.048.2

ABSTRACT

The article deals with the problems of innovative methods in museum pedagogics and it’s role in the identity formation of the child. It is especially important for orphans whose negative experience destroys the idea of ideological and moral values. A museum complex “The Flow of the Time” functions in the orphanage, containing also exhibits that have information about the spiritual culture of the Ukrainian nation, its ancient and modern history. The openness and accessibility of the museum creates special conditions for the cultural development of children-orphans. Involvement in the museum pedagogy of individually oriented methods aimed at enhancing the intellectual and creative abilities of the individual, allows to broaden the horizons of pupils, raise their cultural level, and promote their socialization. The introduction of innovative technologies makes it possible to turn a museum in an orphanage into a development center for an orphaned child.

One of the main tasks of our museum work is the development of children creative competences. All museum’s work is aimed at involving children in the creative process, when the desire to create and the desire to learn and recognize the new are mutually interconnected. The museum’s social partnership allows to expand the range of museum work. Participation in archeological expeditions and searching with the Military Club promotes the involvement of children in active research work. Under the direction of the Republican Small Academy of Sciences, a virtual museum was created and placed on the site of the orphanage “Perlynka”. In addition, the museum was included to the all-Ukrainian project “Museum Planet”. Communication with students of the Odessa National University I.I. Mechnikova and the participation in various joint events is important for the social development of the orphan child.

Key words: museum pedagogy, competence approach, creative groups.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Ivanova, S.V. 2019. Innovative Methods in Museum Pedagogics (оn the example of the orphanage “Perlynka”) (Innovatsiini metodyky v muzeinii pedahohitsi (na prykladi dytiachoho budynku «Perlynka»)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 180-184 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Ivanova, S.V. 2016. Kompetentnostnyj podhod v muzejnoj pedagogike. Visnyk Odeskogo istoriko-krayeznavchogo muzeju, 15, s. 64-67. (in Russian)
Ovcharuk, O.V. (ed.). 2004. Kompetentnisnyj pidhid u suchasnij osviti: svitovij dosvid ta ukrayinski perspektyvi. Kiyiv.: K.I.S. (in Ukrainian)
Rudenko, S.B. 2012. Pro mozhlivosti sociokulturnogo vykoristannya muzejnyh pam’yatok u suchasnyh umovah. Visnik Derzhavnoyi akademiyi kerivyih kadriv kultury i mystetstv, 3, s. 79-83. (in Ukrainian)
Savchenko, O.Ya. 2004. Uminnya vchitisya yak klyuchova kompetentnist zagalnoyi serednoyi osvity. In: Ovcharuk, O.V. (ed.). Kompetentnisnyj pidhid u suchasnij osviti: svitovij dosvid ta ukrayinski perspektyvi. Kiyiv.: K.I.S, s. 34 – 52. (in Ukrainian).

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Challenges for the Modern Museum: how to understand and prepare, 174-179

Lowak Victoria B.
trainer for Museum Marketing and Communication

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-174-179
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-174-179
УДК: 069:378

ABSTRACT

The main components that determine the development of a modern museum are communication, interaction and participation. Each of them is heterogeneous, complex and multidimensional.

Communication includes a wide range of components, beginning with various forms of information transfer, communication between the exponent and the audience, interaction through various media forms and ending with marketing communication and branding. Interaction involves not only the involvement of analogue and electronic media in the exposition of the museum, but also the use of related media (website, blog, apps) as separate forms interaction. In other words, the modern museum functions both in the classical off-line mode as well as on-line. Participation is not only about various ways of active involvement of visitors at all phases of preparation and “consumption” of a museum’s “product”, but also about exhibition design, visitor research and evaluation of exhibitions.

To be capable to implement its own individual goals in today’s challenging and quickly changing environment and in accordance with global trends (communication, interactivity and partisanship), a museum needs qualified staff. Today museum’s stuff is required not only to possess fundamental knowledge about the work with the collection - collection, preservation, research, interpretation and exhibition, but also needs to have a number of new competences, including communication, marketing and project management skills. Therefore, the effective education of modern museum specialists requires thorough theoretical training as well as broad interdisciplinary orientation and integration into the actual museum practice..

Key words: communication, interactivity, participation, museum management, museum marketing.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Lowak, V.B. 2019. Challenges for the Modern Museum: how to understand and prepare (Vyklyky dlia suchasnoho muzeiu: zrozumity ta pidhotuvatysia). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 174-179 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Ahapova, D. 2016. Muzeina komunikatsiia v dusi kultury uchasti. V: Hrubrina, Yu., Morozova, L., Pylypchuk, T. ta in. (up.). Kult chy kultura: uchasnytski praktyky v muzeiakh. K: Vydavets Cherednychenko A.M., s. 66-98. (in Ukrainian)
Borysova, T. 2015. Marketynh nekomertsiinykh orhanizatsii u rozrizi sfer diialnosti: teoriia i praktyka. Ternopil: Aston. (in Ukrainian)
Kotler, N., Kotler, F., Kotler, V. 2010. Muzeinyi marketynh i stratehiia: formuvannia misii, zaluchennia publiky, zbilshennia dokhodiv i resursiv. K: VD «Stylos». (in Ukrainian)
Fer, M. 2016. Partysypatsiia yak zasib vid muzeinoi dementsii. V: Hrubrina, Yu., Morozova, L., Pylypchuk, T. ta in. (up.). Kult chy kultura: uchasnytski praktyky v muzeiakh. K: Vydavets Cherednychenko A.M., s. 18-41. (in Ukrainian)
Chernobai, Yu. M., Bryndza, V. O. 2014. Proekt stratehii zbalansovanoho rozvytku muzeiu. 2014. Naukovi zapysky Derzhavnoho pryrodoznavchoho muzeiu, 30, s. 3-22. (in Ukrainian)
Iureneva T. 2007. Muzeevedenie: Uchebnik dlia vysshei shkoly. M: Akademicheskii Proekt. (in Russian).
Dauschek, A. 2016. Museumsmanagemant als Aufgabe zwischen Ökonomie und kultereller Praxis – ein Rückblick. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 43-51.
Döring, J. 2016. Digitale Exponate – ein neues Medium. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 85-93.
Geyer, H. 2008. Kulturbezug des Kulturmarketing. In: Geyer, H., Manschwetus, U. 2008. Kulturmarketing. München, Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag, S. 3-12.
Föhl, P., Glogner-Pilz, P. 2017. Kulturmanagement als Wissenschaft: Grundlagen – Entwicklungen – Perspektiven. Einführung für Studium und Praxis. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Lockstone, L. 2011. Major case study: Shape shifters – the role and function of modern museum. In: Museum Marketing: Competing in the Global Marketplace. New York: Routledge, p. 61-68.
New Territory for Art: From the iPhone to the Brooklyn Museum [online]. https://www.aandbscotland.org.uk/uploads/research/New_Territory_for_Art_-_iphone_to_Brooklyn_Museum.pdf
. Edinburgh: Arts & Business Scotland. [Application date October 16, 2019].
Rainer, W., Kirmeier, J. 2016. Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation als Koordinaten der Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Wenrich, R., Kirmeier, J. (Hrsg.). Kommunikation, Interaktion und Partizipation: Kunst – und Kulturvermittlung im Museum am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. München: kopaed, S. 7-16.
Rentschler, R. 2011. Museum Marketing: no longer a dirty word. In: Rentschler, R., Hede, A. 2011. Museum Marketing: Competing in the Global Marketplace. New York: Routledge, p. 12-20.

External reviews: ЗАВАНТАЖИТИ

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Attic Black-glazed Pottery from the Collection of Exposition of the Archaeological Museum of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, 166-172

Chechulina Iryna O.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-166-172
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-166-172
UDK:[904.23:069.5]”652”

ABSTRACT

Finds of Attic tableware and ceremonial ware in the North Black Sea region are mass, and that is why they are so important since they provide information for detailed chronology of ancient material. The collection of finds from Olbia, which is exhibited in the Archaeological Museum of IA NASU, is quite numerous. The investigated part of the material includes Attic black-glazed pottery, which was found in Olbia in different years at different sites of excavations, from 1962 to 2000. Some finds, unfortunately, have only museum archive numbers, so we are not able to trace their origin. All the ceramic material is well preserved, all necessary parts are properly restored, and they are exhibited in the main hall dedicated to archeology of the Iron Age of Ukraine.

The vast majority of the studied collection consists of vessels for drinking wine – eleven vessels of the sixteen studied, dating from the Athenian Agora from 500 to 325 BC.

Pottery for wine are represented by cups and kantharos in various types. These are the cup – «bolsal» 420 BC – two examples; cup-kantharos 340–325 BC – two examples; two Hellenistic kantharos with an applique ornament IV BC and one kantharos – micro form; cup-skyphos 410 BC; stemmed dish 500 BC; cup “delicate class” 430 BC and a stemmed cup of the middle of the 5th BC.

Open types of pottery include a bowl with an outturned rim 420 BC and fish plate 350–325 BC.

Rare finds of the pottery of the closed forms are oynohoya with relief ornament of the V century BC and a Hellenistic pelika with an applique ornament.

All the above forms have direct analogies in the material from the Athenian Agora and finds of Attic black-glazed ware from other cities in the Northern Black Sea. These forms belong to the ceremonial tableware demonstrate an active trade relations of the Olbio Polis with the Attic region during the classical time.

Key words: Attic black lacquer ceramics, Olbia, museum collection, Northern Black Sea coast, antiquity, classical period, Hellenistic period.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Chechulina, I.O. 2019. Attic Black-glazed Pottery from the Collection of Exposition of the Archaeological Museum of IA NAS of Ukraine (Poperednii analiz attychnoi chornolakovoi keramiky z ekspozytsii Arkheolohichnoho muzeiu IA NAN Ukrainy). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 166-172 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Buiskykh, A.V. 2015. Yuzhnyi temenos Olvyy Pontyiskoi. Vestnyk drevnei istoryy, 2, s. 6-21. (in Russian)
Kozub, Yu.I. 1979. Peredmistia Olvii. Arkheolohiia, 29, s. 3-34. (in Russian)
Levy, E.Y. 1940. Pryvoznaia hrecheskaia keramyka iz raskopok Olvyy v 1935, 1936 hh. Olvyia, 1, s. 105-126. (in Russian)
Nazarchuk, V.Y. 2014. Chernolakovaia keramyka. V: Krizhytskyi, S.D., Leipunskaia, N.A. y dr. Zhylie doma Tsentralnoho kvartala Olvii. MAIET, 13, s. 312-356. (in Russian)
Papanova, V.A. 2000. Chernolakovaia keramyka iz semeino-rodovoho uchastka nekropolia Olvii. Starozhytnosti Stepovoho Prychornomoria i Krymu, 8, s. 194-216. (in Russian)
Papanova, V.A. 1993. Nekropol Olvii. Istoryia issledovanyia, itohy raskopok. Berdiansk: Hortypohrafyia. (in Russian)
Parovych-Peshykan, M. 1974. Nekropol Olvii ellinisticheskoho vremeni. Kiev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Rusiaeva, A.S., Nazarchuk, V.Y. 2006. Atticheskaia keramika. MAIET, 2, s. 169-177. (in Russian)
Farmakovskyi, B.V. 1911. Pamiatnyky antychnoi kulturi, naidennie v Rossyy. IAK, IV (42), s. 134-143. (in Russian)
Chechulina, I.O. 2016. Shtampovanyi ornament na attychnii chornolakovii keramitsi z Olvii. Arkheolohiia (2), s. 29-38. (in Ukrainian).
Alexandrescu, P. 1966. La necropole tumulaire (Fouilles 1955-1961). Histria, II.
Alexandrescu, P. 1978. Le ceramique d’epoqye archaique et classique (VII–IV s). Histria, IV.
Bozkova, A. 1997. A Pontic Pottery Group Hellenistic Age. Archaeologia Bulgarica, 2, p. 8-17.
Handberg, S., Peterson, J.H. 2010. Black-glossed pottery. Black Sea Studies 13, p. 187-196.
Rotroff, S.I. 1991. Attic West Slope Vase Painting. Hesperia, Vol. 60, No. l.
Rotroff, S.I. 1997. Hellenistic Pottery. Athenian and Imported Wheelmade Table Ware and Related Material. The Athenian Agora, XXIX.
Sparkes, B.A., Talcott, L. 1970. Black and Plain Pottery of the 6th, 5th and 4th Centuries B.C. The Athenian Agora XII.
Thompson, H.A., Thompson, D.B., Rotroff, S.I. 1987. Hellenistic pottery and terracottas. Princeton, N.J: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Finds of Young Archaeologist Mug, 159-165

Peresunchak O.S.
History teacher of communal institution "Zavalliysky Lyceum" of Gayvoron district council of Kirovograd region

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-159-165
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-159-165
UDK: [902.2:371.385.4](477.65)

ABSTRACT

The publication is dedicated to the coverage of the activity of the Junior Archeologist Student Circle, which operates on the basis of the communal institution “Zavalliysky Lyceum of the Gayvoron District Council of the Kirovograd region, and which will celebrate the 20th anniversary next year. This children’s association was created with the purpose of interest of young people in the ancient history of the region, education of the younger generation of respect for the monuments of history and cultures, deepening knowledge of the history of Ukraine. It was possible to combine the work of the students with the study in the archeology section of the Kirovograd Small Academy of Sciences of the student youth, which in turn made it possible to achieve some practical and theoretical successes. As a result of a systematic survey of the territory of Middle Pobuzhye, new archeological monuments were discovered, numerous archaeological material were collected and were threatened with destruction as a result of man-made activities. In general, in the territory of the region the circles surveyed settlements, mounds and other objects of different time intervals, starting from the Neolithic period of the Cossack period. Circumstances were constantly reported to the relevant scientific institutions by the founders, and the found artifacts were transmitted for further work by archaeological scientists.Еffective cooperation was established between scientists and young researchers of Pobuzhye. Soon, such cooperation extended beyond the borders of Ukraine. This article is perhaps the first attempt to share experience in the educational process of exploring the archeology students of the Middle Pobuzhye and to introduce into art circulation artifacts that were partially disclosed, as well as those that were not previously known to a wide range of scientists. We hope that this will help attract the attention of scientists to our region, as well as help protect and preserve the cultural heritage of the past.

Key words: Middle Pobuzhya, culture of line-ribbon ceramics, Trypillian culture, anthropomorphic plastic, Bronze Age, Chernyakhiv culture.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Peresunchak, O.S. 2019. Finds of Young Archaeologist Mug (Znakhidky hurtka «Iunyi arkheoloh»). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 159-165 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Videiko, M.Yu. 1987. Otchet ob arkheolohycheskoy razvedke v Hayvoronskom rayone Kyrovohradskoy oblasty v 1987 hodu. NA YA NANU, 1987/37a.
Hopkalo, O.V. 2007. Pro deyaki rezulʹtaty ta perspektyvy doslidzhennya chernyakhivsʹkoho kostyuma. Arkheolohiya. 2007. №2. S. 48-56.
Kyosak, D., Bruyako, Y., Denysyuk, V. 2014. Kompleks arkheolohycheskykh pamyatnykov «Kamennoe-Zavalʹe» v Srednem Pobuzhʹe. Raboty 2011-2012 hh. Tyragetia, s.n. vol. VIII [XXIII], nr.1.
Kiosak, D.V. 2016. «Stepovyy vplyv» na pam’yatky typu Sabatynivka I (za materialamy poselennya Shamrayi). Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Kiosak, D.V. 2018. Hnyla Skelya – nove poselennya kul’tury liniyno-strichkovoyi keramiky. Arkheolohiya, etnolohiya ta okhorona kul’turnoyi spadshchyny Pivdenno-Skhidnoyi Yevropy: zbirka naukovykh robit prysvyachena 25-richchyu kafedry arkheolohiyi ta etnolohiyi Odes’koho national’noho universytetu im. I.I. Mechnikova. Odesa: ONU.
Kiosak, D., Lytvynchuk, YU., Peresunchak, O. 2013. Kam’yane Zavallya 1 – trypil’s’ke poselennya etapu BI na pivnochi Odeshchyny. Drevnee Prychernomor’e. Vypusk X. Odessa: FLP «A.S. Frydman».
Mahomedov, B.V. 1987. Chernyakhovskaya kul’tura Severo-Zapadnoho Prychernomor’ya. K.: Naukova dumka.
Orlyk, O.P., Sokolyuk, I.A., Zasyadʹvovk, R.P. 2009. Akty visual’noho obstezhennya terytoriyi Hayvorons’koho rayonu Kirovohrads’koyi oblasti. Kirovohrad.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2012. Novi trypil’s’ki poselennya na Pivdennomu Buzi. Zemledel’tsy i skotovody drevney Evropy. Kyev, Sankt-Peterburh.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2012. Pam’yatky arkheolohiyi Hayvoronshchyny. Materialy IV oblasnykh krayeznavchykh Kutsenkivs’kykh chytan’. Kirovohrad: Lysenko V.F.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2015. Poselennya trypil’s’koyi kul’tury Topoli. MASP. Vyp. ХІІІ. Odessa.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2016. Chernyakhivs’ke poselennya Bila Skelya (Kam’yane-Zavallya) na Seredn’omu Pobuzhzhi. Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2018. Artefakty ta mistseznakhodzhennya doby bronzy na terytoriyi Seredn’oho Pobuzhzhya. Arkheolohiya, etnolohiya ta okhorona kul’turnoyi spadshchyny Pivdenno-Skhidnoyi Yevropy: zbirka naukovykh robit prysvyachena 25-richchyu kafedry arkheolohiyi ta etnolohiyi Odes’koho national’noho universytetu im. I.I. Mechnikova. Odesa: ONU.
Peresunchak, O.S. 2018. Novi pam’yatky arkheolohiyi v baseyni r. Mohylyanka. Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk ХІІ. Odesa: Odes’kyy national’nyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnikova.
Peresunchak, O.S., Burdo, N.B. 2015. Kolektsiya plastyky iz ran’otrypil’s’koho poselennya Mohyl’na III. Kul’turnyy kompleks Kukuten’-Trypillya ta yoho susidy. Zbirka naukovykh prats’ pam’yati V. Krutsa. Lviv: Astrolyabiya.
Peresunchak, O.S., Tupchiyenko, M.P. 2018. Monety ryms’koho chasu z muzeynoho zibrannya Zavallivs’koho navchal’no-vykhovnoho ob’yednannya «Zahal’noosvitnya shkola I – III stupeniv» Hayvorons’koho rayonu yak vidobrazhennya osoblyvostey hroshovykh vidnosyn imperiyi z varvars’kym svitom. Materialy mizhnarodnoyi konferentsiyi «Aktual’ni problemy numizmatyky u systemi spetsial’nykh haluzey istorychnoyi nauky». Pereyaslav-Medzhybizh.
Rudʹ, V., Peresunchak, O., Sobchuk, V. 2018. Zvit pro robotu Skhidno-Podil’s’koyi arkheolohichnoyi ekspedytsiyi na terytoriyi Kirovohrads’koyi oblasti u 2017 r.: obstezhennya pam’yatok arkheolohiyi Kazavchyns’koyi sils’koyi rady Hayvorons’koho rayonu. Kyyiv, Kropyvnyts’kyy.
Tsvek, O.V. 2006. Poselennya skhidnotrypil’s’koyi kul’tury (korotkyy narys). K.: Instytut arkheolohiyi NANU.
Tsybeskov, V.P. 1971. Nekotorye ytohy yssledovanyya Berezovskoho poselenyya. MASP. Vyp. 7. Odessa.
Petrequin, P., Errera, M., Voinea, V., Tsonev, T., Turkanu, S., Serbanescu, D., Kiosak, D., Peresunchak, O., Polischuk, L. et Chernakov, D. 2017. Des Alpes a la mer Noire (Bulgarie, Romanie et Ukraine). Jade objets-signes et interpretations sociales des jades alpins dans l’Europe neolithique. Presses universitares de France-Comte Centre de Recherche Archiologique de la Vallee de Ain.
Thomas, S., Posselt, М., Dębiec, М., Kiosak, D.,Tkachuk, T. 2016. Prospections magnetometriqeues sur des sites de la culture Cucuteni – Trypillia sur le cours du Dnistre et tu Boug de sud neamt county museum complex Cucuteni eneolithic art museum of Piatra-Neamt cucuteni culture international research centre cucuteni culture within the european neo-eneolithic contex. Proceedings of the International Colloquium „Cucuteni – 130” 15-17 October 2014. Piatra-Neamts..

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
New Explorations of the Trypillia Settlements of Bugh-Dnieper Interfluve: a collection of flint finds, 144-158

Hofmann R.¹, Shatilo L.O.¹, Pichkur Ye.V.^2
1 Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (Germany)
² Archaeological Museum of Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-144-158
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-144-158
УДК:[903.4:552.553](477.46+477.65)”636”

ABSTRACT

As a result of the exploration survey carried out at three different-time Trypillian sites in the interfluve of the Bugh and Dnieper rivers (Chyzhivka, Veselyi Kut and Volodymyrivka), an informative collection of flint artifacts was collected.

The most indicative, both quantitatively and qualitatively, is the lithic collection from the settlement of Volodymyrivka. In total, it contains 121 products and is divided into two categories: production wastes and tools. Cores, flakes, blades and other products represent production wastes (56 items). Among the tools (65 lithics), there are retouched blades and flakes, end scrapers, notched, perforators, chisels, sickle insets, arrowheads and other products with secondary processing. Most of the artifacts found in Volodymyrivka made of local raw material, which is found in sufficient quantities along the banks of the Syniukha River, not far from the settlement, although the collection also contains items made of Volynia-like flint. By the nature of the finds, a full cycle of flint processing took place at the settlement: extraction — primary — secondary treatment of flint. This is evidenced by the presence of outcrops of raw material near the settlement and products made of it, which were found directly at the settlement; the presence in the collection of both production wastes and tools related directly to the process of flint knapping – stone hammers; presence of retouched products and cases of their reutilization or repair. The typology and statistics of products almost completely coincides with the data published earlier on the results of excavations. We have also identified tools that were not previously found on the site – chisels.

The closest analogy to the Volodymyrivka lithic assemblage is the collection of the synchronous Andriivka settlement. Comparison of the two assemblages, taking into account the previously published data, made it possible to take a fresh look at the flint industry of the Volodymyrivka local-chronological group and highlight some of its features.

Key words: Trypillia culture, Chalcolithic, settlements, flint artifacts, Eastern Trypillia, Western Trypillia, archaeo-magnetic survey.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Hofmann R., Shatilo L.O., Pichkur Ye.V. 2019. New Explorations of the Trypillia Settlements of Bugh-Dnieper Interfluve: a collection of flint finds (Novi rozvidky na trypil’s’kykh poselenniakh Buho-Dnistrovs’koho mezhyrichchia: kolektsiia kremianykh znakhidok). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 144-158 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Kruts, V.A., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A.G., Rassman, K., Peters, D. 2011. Tal'yanki: perezagruzka. Geomagnitnaya s`yemka tri desyatiletiya spustya posle rabot. V: Kruts, V.A., Korvin-Piotrovskiy A.G., Ryzhov, S.N., Chernovol, D.K., Chabanyuk, V.V. Poseleniye – gigant Tal'yanki. Issledovaniya 2011 / Talianki – settlement-giant of the Tripolian culture. Investigations in 2011 (Kiev 2011), s. 60–85.
Movsha, T.G. 1984. Khronologiya Tripol'ya-Kukuteni i stepnyye kul'tury epokhi rannego metalla v yeye sisteme. Problemy arkheologii Podneprov'ya: Sb.n.s. Dnepropetrovsk, c. 60–83.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Rassmann, K., Mishka, K., Videiko, M.Yu., Burdo, N.B. 2014. Maydanetskoye: issledovaniya po obnovlennomu planu poseleniya. Stratum Plus, 2, c. 285–302.
Passek, T.S. 1940. Tripol'skoye poseleniye u Vladimirovki. VDI, № 1. s. 212-220
Passek, T.S. 1947. Tripol'skoye poseleniye u Vladimirovki v svete novykh issledovaniy. KSIIMK, Vyp. 21. s. 65-74.
Passek, T.S. 1949. Periodizatsiya tripol'skikh poseleniy. MIA, № 10, 248 s.
Petrun’, V.F. 2004. Vykorystannia mineralnoi syrovyny naselenniam trypilskoi kultury. V: Videiko, M.Yu. (Ed.). Entsyklopediia trypilskoi tsyvilizatsii, T. 1. Kyiv, s. 199-218.
Pichkur, E.V. 2017. Indicators of «Imports» in Trypillian Culture (on materials of «hoards» of flint blades) (Indikatory «importov» v tripolskoy kulture (po materialam «kladov» kremnevykh plastin)). VITA ANTIQUA, 9, HUMAN & LANDSCAPE: Prehistoric Archaeology of Eastern Europe. p. 206-222. https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2017-9-206-221
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2019. Skladovi kremenevoyi industriyi kukutenʹ-trypilʹsʹkoyi spilʹnoty: vydobutok ta poshyrennya kremenyu. Arkheolohiya i davnya istoriya Ukrayiny, 3 (32), s. 37—49. https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2019.03.03
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2019a. Comparative analysis of lithic assemblages of Trypillian culture settlements Volodymyrivka and Andriyivka. In: Terpylovskyy R.V., Shydlovskyi P.S. (Eds.). International Scientific Conference «ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEOLOGY IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH» on 75-th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology (October 24 - 25, 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine): Abstracts. K.: Center for Prehistoric Research, p. 37-38.
Ryzhov, S.M. 2007. Suchasnyy stan vyvchennya kulʹturno-istorychnoyi spilʹnosti kukutenʹ-trypillya na terytoriyi Ukrayiny. V: O. Olʹzhych. Arkheolohiya. K., c. 437–477.
Ryzhov, S.N. 2015. Vladimirovskaya lokal'no-khronologicheskaya gruppa zapadnotripol'skoy kul'tury v Bugo-Dneprovskom mezhdurech'ye. Kulʹturnyy kompleks Kukutenʹ-Trypillya ta yoho susidy : Zbirka naukovykh pratsʹ pamyati Volodymyra Krutsa za redaktsiyeyu Oleksandra Dyachenka, Franchesko Menotti, Serhiya Ryzhova, Kateryny Bunyatyan i Slavomira Kadrova. Lʹviv. s. 153-166.
Tsvek, O.V. 1985. Osoblyvosti formuvannya skhidnoho rehionu trypilʹsʹko-kukutensʹkoyi spilʹnosti. Arkheolohiya, Vyp. 51, s. 31–45.
Tsvek, Ye.V. 1989. Bugo-dneprovskiy variant vostochnotripol'skoy kul'tury: K probleme vydeleniya kul'tur i lokal'nykh variantov Tripol'ya. Pervobytnaya arkheologiya: Materialy i issledovaniya: Sb. nauch. tr. / AN USSR. IA. K.: Nauk. dumka, s. 106–117.
Tsvek, Ye.V. 1995. Veselyy Kut – novyy tsentr vostochnotripol'skoy kul'tury. Arkheologicheskiye vesti, № 4, s. 33–44.
Tsvek,O.V. 1999. Struktura skhidnotrypilʹsʹkoyi kulʹtury. Arkheolohiya, № 3, s. 28–40.
Tsvek, O.V. 2006. Poselennya skhidnotrypilʹsʹkoyi kulʹtury (korotkyy narys). K.
Chernysh, Ye.K. 1951. Tripol'skiye orudiya truda s poseleniya u s. Vladimirovki. KSIIMK, Vyp. XL, s. 85-95.
Yakubenko, O. 2004. Volodymyrivka. V: Videyko, M.Yu. (red.). Entsyklopediya trypilʹsʹkoyi tsyvilizatsiyi, T. 2. Kyiv, s. 104.
Chapman, J. 2017. The Standard Model, the Maximalists and the Minimalists: New Interpretations of Trypillia Mega-Sites. Journal of World Prehistory 30, 3, p. 221–237.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B. 2016. Low-Density Urbanism: The Case of Trypillia Group of Ukraine. In: M. Fernández-Götz/D. Krause (Ed.), Eurasia at the Down of History. Urbanization and Social Change. New York, p. 81–105.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B., Hale, D. 2016. Nebelivka: Assembly Houses, Ditches, and Social Structure. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Eds.) Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 117–131.
Chapman, J., Videiko, M.U., Hale, D., Gaydarska, B., Burdo, N., Rassmann, K., Mischka, C., Müller, J., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Kruts, V. 2014. The Second Phase of the Trypillia Mega-Site Methodological Revolution: A New Research Agenda. European Journal of Archaeology. 17, 3, p. 369–406.
Dal Corso, M., Out, W.A., Ohlrau, R., Hofmann, R., Dreibrodt, S., Videiko, M., Müller, J., Kirleis, W. 2018. Where are the cereals? Contribution of phytolith analysis to the study of subsistence economy at the Trypillia site Maidanetske (ca. 3900-3650 BCE), central Ukraine. Journal of Arid Environments 157, p.137–148.
Dergačev, V. 2002. Die äneolithischen und bronzezeitlichen Metallfunde aus Moldavien. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Diachenko, A., Menotti, F. 2017. Proto-Cities or Non-Proto-Cities? On the Nature of Cucuteni–Trypillia Mega-Sites. Journal of World Prehistory 30, 3, p. 207–219.
Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B. 2016. Nine Questions for Trypillia Megasite Research. In: Borisov, B.D. Studia in Honorem Professoris Boris Borisov. Veliko Trnovo, p. 179–197.
Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W. 2016. Trypillian Subsistence Economy: Animal and Plant Exploitation. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 195–205.
Hofmann, R., Ţerna, S., Ursu, C. E., Brandtstätter, L., Tiede, H., Mainusch, W., Authenrieth, S. 2016. Spatial organization and population size of small Cucuteni-Tripolye settlements: Results of geomagnetic surveys in Baia and Adâncata, Suceava County, Bucovina, Eastern Romania. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 18, p. 157–189.
Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Hofmann, R., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y., Brandtstätter, L. 2016. Pottery Kilns in Trypillian settlements. Tracing the division of labour and the social organisation of Copper Age communities. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 221–252.
Müller, J. 2016. Demography and Social Agglomeration: Trypilla in a European Perspective. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 7–16.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Brandtstätter, L., Ohlrau, R., Videiko, M. Y. 2016a. Chronology and Demography: How Many People Lived in a Mega-Site? In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 133–170.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Kirleis, W., Dreibrodt, S., Ohlrau, R., Brandtstetter, L., Dal Corso, M., Out, W., Rassmann, K., Burdo, N., Videiko, M. Y. 2016b. Maidanetske 2013 – New excavations at a Trypillia mega-site. Studien zur Archäologie in Ostmitteleuropa 16, Bonn.
Müller, J., Hofmann, R., Ohlrau, R. 2016c. From Domestic Households to Mega-Structures: Proto-Urbanism? In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory  4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 253–268.
Müller, J., Rassmann, K. 2016. Introduction. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 1–5.
Müller, J., Videiko, M. 2016. Maidanetske: New Facts of a Mega-Site. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 71–93.
Nebbia, M., Gaydarska, B., Millard, A., Chapman, J. 2018. The making of chalcolithic assembly places: Trypillia megasites as materialized consensus among equal strangers? World Archaeology, p. 1–21.
Ohlrau, R. 2015. Trypillia Großsiedlungen: Geomagnetische Prospektion und architektursoziologische Perspektiven (MSc thesis Kiel University). Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 17, p. 17–99.
Ohlrau, R. 2018. Maidanets’ke. Development and decline of a Trypillian mega-site in Central Ukraine (PhD Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel).
Ohlrau, R., Dal Corso, M., Kirleis, W., Müller, J. 2016. Living on the Edge? Carrying Capacities of Trypillian Settlements in the Buh-Dnipro lnterfluve. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M.Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 207–220.
Pichkur, E. 2012. The flint tools of Andreevka, the Tripolian settlement on the Bolshaya Vys River. In: Menotti, F., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A.G. (eds.). The Tripolye culture giant-settlements in Ukraine: formation, development and decline. Oxford: Oxbow Books, p. 169-182.
Pichkur, Ye.V. 2018. Mining and distribution of flint by the tribes of Cucuteni-Trypillian community. VITA ANTIQUA, 10, Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe, p. 105—118. https://doi.org/10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10-105-117 .
Rassmann, K., Korvin-Piotrovskiy, A. G., Videiko, M. Y., Müller, J. 2016. The new Challenge for Site Plans and Geophysics: Revealing the Settlement Structure of Giant Settlements by Means of Geomagnetic Survey. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 29–54.
Rassmann, K., Ohlrau, R., Hofmann, R., Mischka, C., Burdo, N., Videjko, M. Y., Müller, J. 2014. High precision Tripolye settlement plans, demographic estimations and settlement organization. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 16, p. 63–95.
Videiko, M., Rassmann, K. 2016. Research on Different Scales: 120 Years of Trypillian Large Sites Research. In: Müller, J., Rassmann, K., Videiko, M. Y. (Ed.), Trypillia Mega-Sites and European Prehistory 4100–3400. Themes in Contemporary Archaeology 2. London, New York, p. 17–28.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Brief «Walk-through» in the Archaeological Ceramic Investigations in the Way to a New Approach in Neolithic Ceramics Styles Research, 138-143

Andriiovych M.P.
University of Bern (Switzerland)

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-138-143
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-138-143
UDK: 903.23”634”

ABSTRACT

The study of ceramic is one of the broadest research areas in archaeological sciences. Over the last two centuries, archaeologists have developed a number of approaches and methods that have had different goals of the studies: from the study of ceramics as an object of art to the reproduction of the manufacture technologies, and the study of pottery as a «mediator» for the study of everyday life of the ancient population.

From the end of the XIX century of the archaeological research scholars looking for different algorithms and strategies in the ceramic studies and attributions. To the end of the XX century, ceramics studies became more complex: from pottery as an object to the technology of the manufacture. Scholars defined methodological groups of the ceramic’s investigation as 1. the description of the technologic information; 2. Form description; 3. Patterns analyses; 4. Reconstruction of the cultural traditions of the pottery. Different methodic together with physical-chemical analyses can prove a theoretical hypothesis. Together with the development of physical methods in archaeological research should also develop the methods of form and pattern analyses and fit to the new archaeological theories’ concepts

The purpose of the article is a brief review of the scientific methods developed at different times in Western and Eastern Europe, North America, and to discover new combinations of research approaches that would allow archaeological ceramic complexes to be explored at a new level. This is especially true of the difficulties encountered in the study of Neolithic utensils, given the incomplete forms of utensils, the relatively small number of finds, and natural damage.

The new paradigm in ceramics investigations is the studies of the raw material of Neolithic cera-mics using natural methods of analysis, such as binocular, p-XRF, spectrographic analyses. The results may open up new knowledge regarding the mobility of the ancient population and the cultural exchange between different groups of the Neolithic population.

Key words: Neolithic, ceramic studies, pottery, migration, cultural exchange.

Language: English

PDF

Cite as:
Andriiovych, M.P. 2019. The Brief «Walk-through» in the Archaeological Ceramic Investigations in the Way to a New Approach in Neolithic Ceramics Styles Research. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 116-137.

References:
Andriiovych, M. 2018. A sign of mobility and cultural exchange? The ceramics with scribble line ornamentation from Lysa Hora cemetery. VITA ANTIQUA, 10, Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe, 43-47. DOI: 10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10-43-47.
Andriiovych, M., Hafner,  A., Shydlovskyi, P. 2019. A sign of mobility and cultural exchange? The ceramics with scribble line ornamentation from Lysa Hora cemetery. In: Beyond Paradigms. 25^th EAA Annual Meeting (Bern, 2019) – Abstract Book, p. 323.
Bobrinskiy, A.A. 1978. The Pottery-Making of Eastern Europe: Sources And Methods of Study, 272 p. (In Russian).
Childe, V.G. 1929. The Danube in Prehistory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Glushkov, I.G. 1996. Ceramics as a historical source. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS, 328 p. (In Russian).
Gorodtsov, V.A. 1901. Russkaya doistoricheskaya keramika. Trudy 11 Arkheologicheskogo syezda  v Kiyeve, p. 576-672. (In Russian).
Heitz, C., Stapfer, R. 2017. Mobility and pottery production, what for? Introductory remarks. In: Mobility and Pottery Production. Archaeological and anthropological perspectives, p. 11 – 39.
Klein, L.S. 2011. Istoriya archeologicheskoy mysli, S.-Pererburg, 694 p. (In Russian).
Kotova, N.S. 2015. Drevneyshaya keramika Ukrainy. Kyiv, 154 p. (In Russian).
Pustovalov, S.Zh. 2001. Classification of Catacomb Ceramics. In: Bronze Age of the Don-Donetsk Region: Materials of the 5^th Ukrainian-Russian Field Archaeological Seminar. Kiev – Voronezh, p. 88 – 95. (In Russian).
Rice, P.M., 1987. Pottery analysis. A Source book, 559 p.
Roberts, B.W., Linden, M.V. 2011. Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability and Transmission.
Shepard, A.O. 1985. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, 414 p.
Stapfer, R. 2017. Special pottery in ‘Cortaillod’ settlements of the Neolithic western Switzerland. In: Mobility and Pottery Production. Archaeological and anthropological perspectives, p. 141 – 167.
Stapfer, R., Heitz, C., Hinz, M., Hafner, A. 2019. Interdisciplinary examinations carried out on heterogeneous coarse ceramics from Neolithic lakeside settlements in the Northern Alpine Foreland (3900-3500 BCE): Analysis strategy and preliminary results from a test series using pXRF, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 25, p. 217 – 238.
Tsetlin, Y.B. 2012. Ancient Ceramics. Theory and Methods of Historical-and Cultural Approach. Moscow: IA RAS, 395 p. (In Russian).
Tsetlin, Y.B. 2017. Ceramics. Concepts and Definitions of the Historical-and-Cultural Approach. Moscow: IA RAS. 346 p. (In Russian).
Voyevodskiy, M.V. 1936. K izucheniyu goncharnoy tekhniki pervobytno-kommunisticheskogo obsh chestva na territorii lesnoy zony Yevropeyskoy chasti RSFSR. Sovetskaya arkheologiya, T. 1, p. 51-79. (In Russian).
Wendrich, W., Barnard, H. 2008. The archaeology of mobility. Definitions and research approaches. In: H. Barnard and W. Wendrich (eds.) The Archaeology of Mobility. Old World and New World Nomadism. Costen Advances Seminar Series 4. Los Angeles: Costen Institute of Archeology, University of California, p. 1-21.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Odessa Dimension of Higher Archaeological Education in the second half of the XIX^th and First Half of the XX^th Century: history, scientific schools, traditions, 60-65

Levchenko V.V.
Odessa National Maritime University

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-60-65
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-60-65
UDK: [902:378](477.74)

ABSTRACT

On the basis of the interdisciplinary approach, the study of the main stages and problems of the development of higher archaeological education in Odessa in the second half of the nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century was conducted. In the nineteenth century the leading center for scientific research on archeology in Odessa was traditionally the Novorossiysk University. In its walls, the accumulation of scientific research in the field of classical archeology and the emergence of the process of institutionalization of archaeological education and science in Odessa. Since 1920 there have been changes in the field of higher education for the training of archaeologists. The elements of the reform of higher education of the Soviet era of the 1920s and 1930s were traced, with its experiments in the field of archaeological education, the process of restoration of historical faculties in 1934 and the revival of the imperial system of higher education during the German-Romanian occupation of Odessa. The Soviet archaeological science in the first post-revolutionary years, which grew up on the foundation of pre-revolutionary archaeology, received organizational continuity, manifested itself in the formation of the state of the Odessa Archaeological Institute and the Odessa State Historical and Archaeological Museum, where during the 1921-1933 biennium the main forces of the Odessa archaeologists were united, and their leading specialists subsequently became part of the Department of History of the Ancient World and the Archeology of the Open 1934 Historical Faculty of the Odessa State University. The process of institutionalization of archaeological research in Odessa took place in difficult socio-political and socio-economic conditions and did not become stable. Despite the cataclysms of the first post-revolutionary times, the constant transformation of the network of universities and scientific institutions, the persecution and death of many specialists, the staff of Odessa scientists was able to promote the development of higher archaeological education in Odessa.

Key words: archaeology, Odessa, higher education, science, archaeological scientists.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Levchenko, V.V. 2019. The Odessa Dimension of Higher Archaeological Education in the second half of the XIX^th and First Half of the XX^th Century: history, scientific schools, traditions (Odeskyi vymir vyshchoi arkheolohichnoi osvity u druhii polovyni KhIKh – pershii polovyni KhKh st.: istoriia, naukovi shkoly, tradytsii). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 60-65 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Borovoy, S.Ya. 1979. K istorii sozdaniya Odesskogo arkheologicheskogo instituta i yego arkheograficheskogo otdeleniya. Arkheograficheskiy yezhegodnik za 1978 god. Moskva, s. 96-101. (in Russian).
Dlozhevskiy, S.S. 1921. Organizatsiya Arkheologicheskogo instituta v Odesse: Istoricheskaya spravka. Narodnoye prosveshcheniye, 2-5, s. 57-63. (in Russian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2008. Odesʹkyy humanitarno-suspilʹnyy instytut (1920–1921): do pytannya spadkoyemnosti tradytsiy universytet·sʹkoyi osvity. Zapysky istorychnoho fakulʹtetu. Odesa. Vyp. 19, s. 207-216. (in Ukrainian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2010. Istoriya Odesʹkoho instytutu narodnoyi osvity (1920–1930 rr.): pozytyvnyy dosvid nevdaloho eksperymentu / Vidp. red. V.M. Khmarsʹkyy; nauk. red. T.M. Popova. Odesa: TES. (in Ukrainian).
Levchenko, V.V. Levchenko G.S. 2012. Muzey izyashchnykh iskusstv Imperatorskogo Novorossiyskogo universiteta: fondy, personalii, sud’ba. Voprosy muzeologii. SPb, 2 (6), s. 105-113. (in Russian).
Levchenko, V.V. 2016. Korotka istoriya Odesʹkoho arkheolohichnoho instytutu: vid zarodzhennya ideyi do yiyi realizatsiyi za initsiatyvoyu «znyzu» ta likvidatsiyi «zverkhu» (do 95-richchya vid dnya zasnuvannya). Starodavnye Prychornomor’ya. Vypusk XI, s. 291-299. (in Ukrainian).
Muzychko, O.Ye. 2012. Odesʹkyy oseredok arkheolohichnoyi pedahohiky naprykintsi ХІХ – 20 -kh rokakh ХХ st. Arkheolohiya i davnya istoriya Ukrayiny. Vyp. 9, s. 177-180. (in Ukrainian).
O nauchnoy rabote istorikov Odessy i Kiyeva. Istorik-marksist, 1941, 6, s. 140-147. (in Russian).
Okhotnikov, S.B. 2010. Arkheologiya v Odesse. In: 185 let Odesskomu arkheologicheskomu muzeyu (1825–2010). Odessa: SMIL. (in Russian).

External reviews: DOWNLOAD

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Radiocarbon Chronology of the Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic of Crimea, Ukraine, in the Archaeological and Palaeoecological Contexts, 116-137

Yanevich A.A.
Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-116-137
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-116-137
UDK:902.65(477.75)”632/634”

ABSTRACT

Current corpus of the C14 dates of the final periods of Stone Age of Crimea allows to clarify, and, probably, to revise their chronology. Simultaneously, C14 dates in the proposed chronological scheme correspondence and can be tested by the dates of the paleoecological determinations (geologic, palinologic, microfaunistic and malakofaunistic). Also they are confirmed with the stratigraphic position of the cultural layers.

Shan-Koba culture is the earliest among the 5 accepted cultural phenomena of the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Crimea. Its first stages belong to Allerod and, probably, Bolling, more early warming of the Final Pleistocene. At the same time, the final stage of the Shan-Koba culture is dated as the end of the Boreal.

The bearers of the Sviderian culture are known in the second part of the Drias III and the first part of the Preboreal, Shpan-Koba bearers are known in Preboreal and Boreal. The first stage of the Kukrek culture in Crimea is dated as the first half of the Preboreal, it’s final stage – as the beginning of Atlantikum. Murzak-Koba culture development in the Mountain Crimea belongs to the second half of Boreal and beginning of the Atlantikum.

Two Neolithic cultures are known in Atlantikum: Olexiivka culture in plain Crimea and Tash-Air culture in Mountain Crimea.

Coexistence of the bearers of the several cultures in the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Crimea, sometimes on the same territory, in particular, in the Mountain Crimea, reflect complicated ethno-cultural processes. Some cultures have stabile areal and numerous sites – for example, Shan-Koba, Murzak-Koba and Tash-Air cultures of the Mountain Crimea, Kukrek and Olexiivka culture of the Plain Crimea etc. At once, Sviderian and Span cultures are represented by few sites. They are evidences of the periodical migrations of the some groups of the Northern Ukrainian hunters (Sviderian) or the Steppe hunters of the South of Ukraine (Shpan culture) to Crimea.

Key words: Crimea, Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic, Radiocarbon chronology.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Yanevich, A.A. 2019. Radiocarbon Chronology of the Final Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic of Crimea, Ukraine, in the Archaeological and Palaeoecological Contexts (Radiovuhletseva khronolohiia finalnoho paleolitu, mezolitu ta neolitu Krymu v arkheolohichnomu ta paleoekolohichnomu kontekstakh). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 116-137 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Bader, O. N. 1940. Izucheniye epipaleolita Krymskoy yayly. SA, 5, s. 93-110. (in Russian)
Bader, O. N. 1957. Nekotoryye pamyatniki paleolita i mezolita v vostochnoy chasti Gornogo Kryma. Istoriya i arkheologiya drevnego Kryma, Kiyev: Izd-vo AN USSR, s. 7-25. (in Russian)
Bader, N. O. 1976. Nekotoryye itogi rabot pod navesom Buran-Kaya v svyazi s issledovaniyami rannego mezolita Kryma. Vostochnaya Yevropa v yepokhu kamnya i bronzy. Moskva: Nauka, s. 27-37. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N. 1940. K voprosu o neolite Kryma. KSIIMK, IV, s. 26-31. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S.N. 1941. Ob ispol’zovanii ulitok Helix v pozdnepaleoliticheskoye vremya (po materialam Krymskoy paleoliticheskoy ekspeditsii v 1935-1936 gg.). MIA, 2, s. 140-141. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N. 1969. Paleolit Kryma. Priroda i razvitiye pervobytnogo obshchestva. Moskva: Nauka, s. 142-154. (in Russian)
Bibikov, S. N., Stanko, V. N., Koyen, V. Yu. 1994. Final’nyy paleolit i mezolit Gornogo Kryma. Odessa: Vest’. (in Russian)
Bibikova, V. I. 1959. Fauna iz navesa Fat’ma-Koba. KSIA AN USSR, 8, s. 122-124. (in Russian)
Bibikova, V. I. 1982. Ostatki rechnoy vydry (Lutra lutra) iz rannegolotsenovykh otlozheniy Kryma. Vestnik zoologii, 2, s. 8-12. (in Russian)
Bonch-Osmolovskiy, G.A. 1934. Itogi izucheniya krymskogo paleolita. Trudy II mezhdunar. konf. Assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda Yevropy. V, Moskva-Leningrad: Gos. Nauchn.-tekhn. gorno-geologo-neftyanoye izd-vo, s. 114-183. (in Russian)
B’yadzhi, P., Kiosak, D. 2017. Novyye daty dlya final’nogo paleolita i mezolita Gornogo Kryma. Chelovek v istorii i kul’ture, 3, Odesa: Irbis, s. 187-197. (in Russian).
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1951. Epipaleoliticheskaya stoyanka Kukrek v Krymu. KSIIMK, 36, s. 87-95. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1957. Mezoliticheskaya stoyanka Syuren’ II (raskopki 1954-1955 gg.). KSIA AN USSR, 1957, 7, s 7-8. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1961. K voprosu o sviderskoy kul’ture v Krymu (stoyanka Syuren’ II). KSIA AN SSSR, 82, s. 143-149. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1966. K voprosu o svyazyakh naseleniya Kryma v epokhu mezolita. MIA, s. 144-154. (in Russian)
Vekilova, Ye. A. 1971. Kamennyy vek Kryma: nekotoryye itogi i problemy. MIA, 173, s. 117-161. (in Russian)
Voyevodskiy, M. V. 1940. K voprosu o razvitii epipaleolita v Vostochnoy Yevrope. SA, 5, s. 144-149. (in Russian)
Gammerman, A. F. 1934. Rezul’taty izucheniya chetvertichnoy flory po ostatkam drevesnogo uglya. Trudy II mezhdunar. konf. Assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda Yevropy. V, Moskva- Leningrad: Gos. Nauchn.-tekhn. gorno-geologo-neftyanoye izd-vo, s. 60-74. (in Russian)
Haskevych, D.L. 2002. Trapetsiyi zi struhanoyu spynkoyu: deyaki zakonomirnosti vynyknennya ta poshyrennya. Arkheolohiya ta etnolohiya Skhidnoyi Yevropy: materialy i doslidzhennya, 3. Odesa: Druk, s. 73-74. (in Ukrainian)
Herasymenko, N.P. 2004. Rozvytok zonalʹnykh landshaftiv chetvertynnoho periodu na terytoriyi Ukrayiny. Avtoreferat dysertatsiyi d. h. n. IHN NANU. (in Ukrainian)
Gromova, V.I., Gromov V.I. 1937. Materialy dlya izucheniya paleoliticheskoy fauny Kryma v svyazi s nekotorymi voprosami statigrafii. Trudy sovetskogo otdeleniya Mezhdunarodnoy assotsiatsii po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda, 1, s. 52-93. (in Russian)
Danilenko, V. N. 1969. Neolit Ukrainy: Glavy drevney istorii Yugo-Vostochnoy Yevropy. Kiyev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Dvoryaninov, S.A. 1978. O dneprovskikh mogil’nikakh kamennogo veka. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya Severo-Zapadnogo Prichernomor’ya. Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s. 5-16. (in Russian)
Dmitriyeva, Ye. L. 1960. Fauna krymskikh stoyanok Zamil’-Koba II i Tash-Air I. MIA, 91, s. 166-188. (in Russian)
Zhizn’ zhivotnykh. 1971. Moskva: Prosveshcheniye. (in Russian)
Zaytseva, G.I., Timofeyev, V.I., Zagorsk, I., Kovalyukh, N.N. 1997. Radiouglerodnyye daty mezoliticheskikh pamyatnikov Vostochnoy Yevropy. Radiouglerod i arkheologiya: Yezhegodnik Radiouglerodnoy laboratorii, 2, Sankt-Peterburg: Teza, s. 117-127. (in Russian)
Zaliznyak, L. L. 1998. Peredistoriya Ukrayiny X-V tys. do n.e. Kyyiv: Biblioteka ukrayintsya. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L. L. 2005. Finalʹnyy paleolit ta mezolit kontynentalʹnoyi Ukrayiny. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 8, Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L.L. 2010. Periodyzatsiya ta kulʹturna dyferentsiatsiya verkhnʹoho paleolitu Ukrayiny. Arkheolohiya, 2010, 4, s. 3-19. (in Ukrainian)
Zaliznyak, L. L., Yanevych, O. O. 1987. Svidersʹki myslyvtsi hirsʹkoho Krymu Arkheolohiya, 60, s. 6-16. (in Ukrainian)
Ynozemtsev, YU. Y., Stupyna, L. V., Tyuleneva, N. V., Paryshev, A. A., Maslakov, N. A., Sydorenko, V. B., Rybak, E. N., Melʹnychenko, T.A., Paslavskaya, O. V. 2014. Paleoheohrafyya Severo-Zapadnoho shelʹfa Chernoho morya v holotsene. Visnyk ONU. Ser.: Heohrafichni ta heolohichni nauky . 19, 1, s. 43-51. (in Russian)
Kaspyyskoe more: Hydrolohyya y hydrokhymyya. 1983. Moskva: Nauka. (in Russian)
Kovalyukh, N. M., Tubolʹtsev, O. V. 1998. Pervye radyokarbonnye daty surskoy kulʹtury. Arkheolohichni vidkryttya v Ukrayini 1997-1998 rr. Kyyiv: NAN Ukrayiny, Instytut arkheolohiyi, s. 80-81. (in Russian)
Koyen, V.Yu. 1994. Hirsʹkokrymsʹka kulʹtura (do problemy kulʹturno-istorychnoyi typolohiyi finalʹnoho  paleolitu). Arkheolohiya, 4, s. 5–19. (in Ukrainian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1960. Raskopki peshchery Kara-Koba v Krymu. KSIA AN USSR, 10, s. 17-22. (in Russian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1963. Nekotoryye voprosy istorii neolita Kryma. SA, 3, s. 257-265. (in Russian)
Kolosov, Yu. H. 1971. Neolit Krymu. Arkheolohiya Ukrayinsʹkoyi RSR, 1, Kyyiv: Naukova dumka, s. 129-137. (in Ukrainian)
Kolosov, Yu. G. 1985. Neolit Kryma. Arkheologiya Ukrainskoy SSR, 1, Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s 150-156. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S. 1994. Mariupol’skaya kul’turno-istoricheskaya oblast’ (Dnepro-Donskoye mezhdurech’ye). Arkheolohichni pam’yatky ta istoriya starodavnʹoho naselennya Ukrayiny, 1, Luts’k. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S. 2002. Neolitizatsiya Ukrainy. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Kotova, N. S , Tubol’tsev, O. V. 2001. Novyye pamyatniki epokhi neolita i eneolita u goroda Melitopolya. Problemy arkheologii i arkhitektury, 1, Arkheologiya, Donetsk-Makeyevka: Institut arkheologii NANU, s. 4-27. (in Russian)
Kraynov, D. A. 1960. Peshchernaya stoyanka Tash-Air I kak osnova dlya periodizatsii poslepaleoliti cheskikh kul’tur Kryma. MIA, 91. Moskva-Leningrad: Nauka. (in Russian)
Manyukhin, I. S. 2014. Kul’turno-istoricheskiy podkhod v arkheologii: proshloye i nastoyashcheye. Gumanitarnyye nauchnyye issledovaniya, 3. Available at: http://human.snauka.ru/2014/03/6187 (in Russian)
Manʹko, V.O. 2006. Neolit Pivdeno-Skhidnoyi Ukrayiny. Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Manʹko, V. O. 2013. Finalʹnyy paleolit – neolit Krymu: kulʹturno-istorychnyy protses, Kyyiv: Shlyakh. (in Ukrainian)
Man’ko, V. A., Telizhenko, S. A. 2002. Mezolit, neolit i eneolit Podonech’ya: Katalog radiokarbonnykh dat. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Matskevoy, L. G. 1977. Mezolit i neolit Vostochnogo Kryma. Kiyev: Naukova dumka.
Nuzhnyy, D. Yu. 1992. Rozvytok mikrolitychnoyi tekhniky v kamʺyanomu vitsi. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Opredelitel’ ryb i bespozvonochnykh Kaspiyskogo morya. 1. Ryby i molyuski. 2013, Sankt-Peterburg-Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. (in Russian)
Palamarchuk, S. V. 2019. Petrovskaya Balka – pamyatnik zaklyuchitel’nogo etapa kamennogo veka. Materialy po arkheologii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya, 14, Odessa: Irbis, s. 49-71. (in Russian).
Stanko, V. N. 1985. K probleme zapadnykh svyazey mezolita Stepnogo Prichernomor’ya (po materialam poseleniya Beloles’ye). Novyye materialy po arkheologii Severo-Zapadnogo Prichernomor’ya, Kiyev: Naukova dumka, s. 31-45. (in Russian).
Stupak, D. V. 1999. Tekhnolohiya rozkolyuvannya kremenyu svidersʹkoyi kulʹtury Ukrayinsʹkoho Polissya za analizom nukleusiv. VITA ANTIQUA, 2, s. 18-25. (in Ukrainian)
Telehin, D. Ya. 1982. Mezolitychni pamʺyatky Ukrayiny (IХ – VI tysyacholittya do n. e.). Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Telegin, D. Ya., Nechitaylo, A. L., Potekhina, I. D., Panchenko, Yu. V. 2001. Srednestogovskaya i novodanilovskaya kul’tury eneolita Azovo-Chernomorskogo regiona. Arkheologo-antropologicheskiy analiz materialov i katalog pamyatnikov. Lugansk: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Telegin, D. Ya. 1991. Neoliticheskiye mogil’niki mariupol’skogo tipa. Kiyev: Naukova dumka. (in Russian)
Telizhenko, S. A., Yanish, Ye. Yu. 2015. Hospodarsʹka diyalʹnistʹ naselennya Pivdennoho uzberezhzhya Krymu v eneoliti – bronzi (za materialamy stoyanky Ardych Burun). Terra Alustiana, MMXI. Symferopolʹ: Antiqua, s. 38-57. (in Ukrainian)
Tovkaylo, M.T. 2003. Krem’yanyy inventar piznʹoneolitychnykh pamʺyatok Stepovoho Pobuzhzhya. Kam’yana doba Ukrayiny, 2, s. 187-206. (in Ukrainian)
Formozov, A. A. 1954. Issledovaniye stoyanok kamennogo veka v Krymu KSIIMK, 54, s. 62-70. (in Russian)
Formozov, A. A. 1962. Neolit Kryma i Chernomorskogo poberezh’ya Kavkaza. MIA, 102. Moskva: Nauka, s. 89-149. (in Russian)
Chabay, V. P. 2004. Sredniy paleolit Kryma. Kiyev: Shlyakh. (in Russian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1987a. Pozdniy mezolit i neolit Kryma (Voprosy stanovleniya neoliticheskoy kul’tury), Avtoreferat dissertatsiy k. i. n. IA NANU AN USSR. (in Russian)
Yanevych, O.O. 1987b. Etapy rozvytku kulʹtury Kukrek v Krymu. Arkheolohiya, 58, s. 7-18. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1990a. K probleme zapadnykh geneticheskikh svyazey rannego mezolita Gornogo Kryma. Problemy pervobytnoy arkheologii Severnogo Prichernomor’ya (K 100-letiyu osnovaniya Khersonskogo muzeya drevnostey). Tez. dokl., 1. Kherson, s. 27-28. (in Russian)
Yanevich, A. A. 1990b. K vydeleniyu novogo kul’turnogo yavleniya v mezolite Kryma. Problemy issledovaniya pamyatnikov arkheologii Severskogo Dontsa. Lugansk, s. 38-40. (in Russian)
Yanevych, O. O. 1993. Shpansʹka mezolitychna kulʹtura. Arkheolohiya, 1, s. 3-15. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych,  O.  O.  2004.  Tash-Ayirsʹka  neolitychna  kulʹtura  Hirsʹkoho  Krymu  (suchasnyy  stan  doslidzhennya). Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 5, s. 169-191. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O. O. 2007. Oleksiyivsʹka neolitychna kulʹtura Rivnynnoho Krymu. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 10, s .203-222. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O.O. 2008. Khronolohiya piznʹomezolitychnoyi murzak-kobynsʹkoyi kulʹtury Hirsʹkoho Krymu. Doslidzhennya pervisnoyi arkheolohiyi v Ukrayini (Do 50-richchya vidkryttya paleolitychnoyi stoyanky Radomyshlʹ), Kyyiv: PP «Korvin-Press», c. 135-146. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O.O. 2010. Svider Krymu v konteksti finalʹnoho paleolitu ta rannʹoho mezolitu pivdnya  Skhidnoyi Yevropy. Matéryyaly pa arkheolohii Belarusi, 18, s. 56-65. (in Ukrainian)
Yanevych, O. O. 2017. Mys Triytsi 1 – kukretsʹka pamyatka na Pivdennomu berezi Krymu. Kamʺyana doba Ukrayiny, 17-18, s. 175-187. (in Ukrainian)
Yanko-Khombakh, V. V., Smyntyna, Ye. V., Kadurin, S. V., Larchenkov, Ye.P., Motnenko, I. V., Kakaranza, S. V., Kiosak, D. V. 2011. Kolebaniya urovnya Chernogo morya i adaptatsionnaya strategiya drevnego cheloveka za posledniye 30 tysyach let. Geologiya i poleznyye iskopayemyye Mirovogo okeana, 2, s. 61-94. (in Russian).
Aksu, A. E., Hiscott, R. N., Mudie, P. J., Rochon, A., Kaminski, M. A., Abrajano, T., Yasar D. 2002. Persistent Holocene Outflow from the Black Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean Contradicts Noah’s Flood Hypothesis. GSA today. A Publication of the Geological Society of America, 12, 5, p. 4-10.
Archaeometry. 37(1), 1995, p. 195-214.
Benecke, N. 1999. Die Tierreste aus dem mesolithischen Abri Span-Koba im Krimgebirge. Beitrage zur Archaozoologie und Prahistorischen Antropologie, II, s. 71-90.
Benecke, N. 2006. Zur Datierung der Faunensequenz am Abri San-Koba (Krim, Ukraine). Beitrage zur Archäozoologie und Prähistorischen Anthropologie, 5, 2006, s. 12-15.
Biagi, Р. 2016. The Last Hunter-Gatherers of the Northern Coast of the Black Sea and their Role in the Mesolithic of Europe: A View from Crimea. Southeast Europe before neolitiisation. Proceedings of the International Workshop within the Collaborative Research Centres sfb 1070 “RessourcenKulturen”, Schloss Hohentübingen, 9 th of May 2014. Tubingen, p. 113-131.
Biagi, P., Zaliznyak, L., Kozlovski, S. K. 2007. Old problems and news perspectives for the radiocarbon chronology of the Ukranian Mezolithic. IGCP (International Geoscience Programme) 521-481 Joint Meeting and Field Trip, Gelendzhik (Russia) – Kerch (Ukraine), September 8-17, 2007. р. 27-29.
Biagi, P., Khlopachev, G. A., Kiosak, D. V. 2014. The radiocarbon Chronology of Shan-Koba rock shelter, a Late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sequence in the Crimean mountains (Ukraine). Diadora, 28, p. 7-20.
Carss, D. N. 1995. Foraging Behaviour and Freeding Ecology of the Otter Lutra Lutra: a selective review. Hystrix, (n.s.) 7 (1-2). p. 179-194.
Cohen, V. 1996. Neolithization of the Crimean mountains (current stage of investigations). Prehistoire Europeenne, 9, p. 417-435.
Cohen, V., Gerasimenko, N., Rekovetz, L., Starkin, A. 1996. Chronostrathigraphie of Rockchelter Skalisty: implementations for the Late Glacial of Crimea. Prehistoire Europeene, 9, р. 326-356.
Cordova, C. E., Gerasimenko, N., Lehman, P. 2011. Late Pleistocene and Holocene paleoenvironments of Crimea: Pollen, soils, geomorphology, and geoarchaeology. Chapter in Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, January, 2011, p. 133-164, DOI: 10.1130/2011.2473(09).
Gorobets, L., Kovalchuk, O., Rekovets, L. 2013. Vertebrates from the Mesolithic site Laspi VII (Crimea, Ukraine). Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Біологія, 3(65), с. 57-59.
Gerasimenko, N. 2004. Vegetetional history of Buran-Kaya III. In: Chabai V. P., Monigal, K., Marks, A. E. (ed.). The Paleolithic of Crimea. III. The Middle Paleolithic and Early Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Crimea, 3, ERAUL, 104, p. 19-34.
Hiscott, R. N., Aksu, A. E., Mudieb, P. J., Marretc, F., Abrajano, T., Kaminski, M. A., Evanse, J., Cakirioglu, A. I., Yasar, D. 2006. A gradual drowning of the southwestern Black Sea shelf: Evidence for a progressive rather than abrupt Holocene reconnection with the eastern Mediterranean Sea through the Marmara Sea Gateway. Quaternary International (2006), doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2006.11.007.
Janevič A. 1995. Die Neolithisierung auf der Krim. Kulturaspekte. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 70, s. 2-35.
Janevic A. 1999. Das Swiderien der Krim. Tanged points cultures in Europe. Libelskie materialy archeologiczne, XIII, Lublin, s. 36-46.
Kertesz, R. 2001. The Mesolithic in the Great Hungarian Plain: A Survey of the Evidence. Proceedings of the International Archaeological Conference held in the Damjanich Museum of Szolnoc, September 22-27, 1996. Budapest, p. 3-51.
Kozlowski, S. K. 2001. Eco-Cultural/Stylistic Zonation of the Mezolithic/Epipalaeolithic in Central Europe. From the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. Proceedings of the International Archaeological Conference held in the Damjanich Museum of Szolnoc, September 22-27, 1996. Budapest, p. 261-282.
Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G, Telizhenko, S., Jones, M. K., 2013. The earliest evidence of domesticated wheatin the Crimea at Chalcolithic Ardych-Burun. Journal of Field Archaeology, 38, 2, p. 120-128.
Nuzhnyi, D. 1998. The Ukrainian Steppe as a region of intercultural contacts between atlantic and mediterranean zones of european Mesolithic. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 5, p. 102-119.
Ostrauskas, T. 1999. Velyvasis paleolitas ir mesolitas Pietu Lietuvoje. Lietuvos archeologija, 16, р. 7-17.
Salavert, A., Messager E., Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute G., Lebreton V., Bayle G., Crépin, L., Puaud, S., Péan, S., Yamada, M., Yanevich, Y. 2014 First results of archaeobotanical analysis from Neolithic layers of Buran Kaya IV (Crimea, Ukraine). Environmental Archaeology, 20(3), DOI: 10.1179/1749631413Y.0000000016 .
Schild, R. 1965. Pozny paleolit Krymu a Cykl mazowszanski. Archeologia Polski, X, 2, p. 431-473.
Schild, R., Pazdur, M. F., Vogel, J. C. 1999. Radiochronology of the tanged point technocomplex in Poland. Tanged points cultures in Europe. Lubelskie materialy archeologiczne, XIII, Lublin, р. 13-16.
Yanevich, A.A. 1998. The Neolithic of the mountainous Crimea. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 5, p. 146-159.
Zaitseva, G.I., Timofeev, V.I., Zagorska, I., Kovaliuk, N.N. 2000. Radiocarbon dates of the Mesolithic sites in Eastern Europe. Radiocarbon and Archaeology, 1, 2000, p. 33-52.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
New Study of Fourth Dwelling from Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic Campsite: the results of International Summer School activity, 92-115

Shydlovskyi P.S.¹, Tsvirkun O.I.², Péan S.³, Chymyrys M.V.¹, Mamchur B.V.^4
1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
² National University ‘Kyiv-Mohyla Academy’, National Museum of the History of Ukraine
³ Muséum national d’histoire naturelle (France)
4 University of Ferrara (Italy)

DOI:10.37098/VA-2019-11-92-115
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-92-115
UDK: [903.3:378.147](477.46)

ABSTRACT

Mezhyrich is an Epigravettian open air base camp, in the Middle Dnieper basin, dated to 14.9 - 14,3 ka ¹⁴C BP. During the second stage of research from 1976 to 1989 an international group of specialists under supervision of M. Gladkikh – the Head of the Department of Archaeology, Ethnography and Museology of T. Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, carried out the excavations and interdisciplinary research of the site. As the result in 1976 fourth mammoth bone dwelling and a field objects around it were opened. The fourth dwelling was partially excavated and left in place for the purpose of a future museumification. An exploration of the cultural layer of the dwelling unit revealed a number of interesting finds and field objects. The stratigraphic sections within this trench revealed several stages of functioning of this object and several layers of human activity.

Since 2018, the Dwelling 4 has been explored by an expedition involving organizations such as the Department of Archeology and Museum Studies at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (P. Shydlovskyi), National Museum of Natural History, France (S. Péan) with the involvement specialists in the field of zooarchaeology, geology, geomorphology, etc. As the current state of affairs requires a new description of the dwelling elements, one of the goals of the 2018-2019 study was to conduct stationary studies of the filling of the dwelling. This works have to be continue in order to obtain data on structural features and the degree of preservation of cultural remains inside the dwelling, and to carry out restoration work to provide a basis for future museuming of the object.

Key words: Upper Palaeolithic, Epigravettian, household unit, mammoth bone dwelling, lithic technology, mammoth hunters.

Language: English

PDF

Cite as:
Shydlovskyi, P.S., Tsvirkun, O.I., Péan, S., Chymyrys, M.V., Mamchur, B.V. 2019. New Study of Fourth Dwelling from Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic Campsite: the results of International Summer School activity. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 92-115.

References:
Adovasio, J., Lenz, B. 1996. Mikrostratigrafiya yamy 4 i zhilishcha 4. Appendix 2. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o raskopkakh pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1995 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1995/96, p. 43-47.
Gladkikh, M. 1977. Nekotoryye kriterii opredeleniya kul’turnoy prinadlezhnosti pozdnepaleoliticheskikh pamyatnikov. In: Problemy paleolita Vostochnoy i Tsentral’noy Yevropy. Leningrad: Nauka, p. 137-143.
Gladkikh, М. 1999. Drevneyshaya arkhitektura po arkheologicheskim istochnikam epokhi paleolita. VITA ANTIQUA, 1. Kiev, p. 29-33. http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/004VA01-gladkikh.pdf
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1979a. Nova sporuda z kistok mamonta v Mezhyrichi. Visnyk AN URSR, 9. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, p. 50-54.
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1979b. Otchet o raskopkakh Mezhirichskogo pozdnepaleoticheskogo poseleniya v 1978 godu. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1978/106, 44 p.
Gladkikh, M., Kornietz, N. 1982. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1979-1981 gg. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1979-81/143, 35 p.
Haesaerts, P., Péan, S., Valladas, H., Damblon, F., Nuzhnyi, D. 2015. Contribution à la stratigraphie du site paléolithique de Mezhyrich (Ukraine), L’anthropologie, 119 (4). Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérior en Ukraine: Mezhyrich, p. 364-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2015.07.002
Kornietz, N.L. 1995. Otchet o rabote pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1994 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #114.
Kornietz, N.L., Gladkikh, M.I., Velichko, A.A., Antonova, V.G., Gribchenko, Yu.N., Zelikson, Ye.M., Kurenkova, Ye.I., Khalcheva, T.A., Chepalyga, A.L. 1981. Mezhyrich. In: Arkheologiya i paleogeografiya pozdnego paleolita Russkoy ravniny. Moscow: Nauka, p. 106-119.
Kornietz N.L., Suntsov Yu.V., Soffer O. 1996. Otchet o raskopkakh pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Mezhirich v 1995 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE #1995/96.
Nuzhnyi, D. 2002. Verkhnʹopaleolitychni pamiyatky typu Mezhyrich ta yikh mistse sered epihravettsʹkykh kompleksiv Serednʹoho Dnipra. Kamiyana doba Ukraiyny, 1. Kyiv: Shlyakh, p. 57-81.
Nuzhnyi, D. 2008. The epigravettian variability of the middle Dnieper river basin. In: Doslidzhennya pervisnoyi arkheolohiyi v Ukrayini. Proceedings of the international conference. Kyiv: Korvin-Press, p. 96-134.
Nuzhnyi, D.Yu., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2015. Variabilité de l’industrie lithique entre les structures de l’ha bitation n° 1 de Mezhyrich, site du Paléolithique supérieur d’Ukraine. L’Anthropologie, 119 (4). Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérior en Ukraine: Mezhyrich, p. 394-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2015.07.003
Péan, S., Prat, S., Nuzhnyi, D. (eds). 2015a. Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérieur en Ukraine: Mezhyrich. L’Anthropologie, 119 (4).
Pidoplichko, I. 1969. Pozdnepaleoliticheskiye zhilishcha iz kostey mamonta na Ukraine. Kiev: Naukova dumka.
Pidoplichko, I. 1976. Mezhirichskiye zhilishcha iz kostey mamonta. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 239 p.
Samoilenko, L.H., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2016. Mezhyrich settlement: What will be future of our past? Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, History, 131 (4), p. 62-69. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223
Shydlovskyi, P. 2013. Doslidzhennya ta problemy zberezhennya Mezhyritsʹkoho poselennya myslyvtsiv na mamontiv. Pratsi Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu pamyatkookhoronnykh doslidzhenʹ,  8. Kyiv, p. 567-581. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1188708
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Priadko, D. 2012. Doslidzhennya pizniopaleolitychnoho poselennya Mezhyrich. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2011. Kyiv, p. 474-475. https://www.academia.edu/29957239/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Semenova, A. 2013. Doslidzhennya hospodarsʹkykh obyektiv Mezhyritsʹkoyi stoyanky. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2012. Kyiv, p. 368-370. https://www.academia.edu/19142872/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S. 2014. Doslidzhennya dilyanky na pivdenʹ vid pershoho mezhy ritsʹkoho zhytla. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2013. Kyiv, p. 268-270. https://www.academia.edu/30571251/
Shydlovskyi, P., Nuzhnyi, D., Péan, S., Lyzun, O. 2015. Doslidzhennya hospodarsʹkoyi yamy №6 na Mezhyritsʹkiy stoyantsi. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2014. Kyiv, p. 259-261. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1202444
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Haesaerts, P., Lyzun, O. 2016. Doslidzhennya zony aktyvnoyi hospodarsʹkoyi diyalʹnosti pershoho HPK Mezhyritsʹkoyi stoyanky. Archaeological researches in Ukraine – 2015. Kyiv, p. 210-213. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1205919
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Crépin, L., Tsvirkun, O. 2018. Investigating a Prehistoric mammoth bone dwelling: from field and lab research to education. Quaternary Perspectives, 25 (2), p. 18-19. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2631382
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Tsvirkun, O. 2019. Archaeological context of Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic settlement with mammoth bone dwelling structures. Quaternary Perspectives, 26 (1), p. 11-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333534353_
Snider, J. 1994. Restavratsionnaya rabota na stoyanke Mezhirich. Appendix 6. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1993 g. Kiev: Scientific Archive of Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE №129, p. 40-43.
Soffer, O. 1993. Vozrast stoyanki po dannym radiouglerodnogo analiza (C 14). Appendix 3. In: Kornietz, N.L. Otchet o rabote na pozdnepaleoliticheskoy stoyanke Mezhirich v 1992 godu. Kiev: Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine, FE, p. 25-27.
Soffer, O., Adovasio, J.M., Kornietz, N.L., Velichko, A.A., Gribchenko, Yu.N., Lenz, B.R., Suntsov, V.Yu. 1997. Cultural stratigraphy at Mezhirich, an Upper Palaeolithic site in Ukraine with multiple occupations. Antiquity, 71 (271), 48-62.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Experience in the Implementation of Experimental Studies in Stone Age Archaeology: education, science and museum studies, 78-91

Ryzhov S.M.¹, Stepanchuk V.M.², Vetrov V.S.³, Naumenko O.O.¹, Pogorilets O.H.^3
1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
²Institute of Archeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
³Mezhibizh State Historical and Cultural Reserve

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-78-91
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-78-91
UDK: [902:378].001.4

ABSTRACT

At the present stage, research in archaeology is inextricably linked with the testing and verification of various methods. One of these methods in archaeology include experiment. At the same time, in the process of research work there is a need to train young scientists who are able to master new methods of processing and interpretation of archaeological material.

For the last 5 years, experimental sites and an experimental laboratory have been established on the basis of the Department of Archaeology and Museum Studies at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv and the State Historical and Cultural Reserve “Mezhibizh” with the participation of the Institute of Archaeology of NAS of Ukraine. Experimental research methodology was developed and an electronic database was created using the latest technologies of material fixation, processing and visualization.

At this stage, an experimental program for the study and reconstruction of the ancient stone knapping methods and techniques in the Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine is being implemented.

The methodological aspects of carrying out the experimental program “The first techniques and technologies of the early prehistory of Ukraine” are presented in the paper.

Key words: experimental studies, experimental map, technique, technology of knapped stone, Lower Paleolithic.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Ryzhov, S.M., Stepanchuk, V.M., Vetrov, V.S., Naumenko, O.O., Pogorilets, O.H. 2019. Experience in the Implementation of Experimental Studies in Stone Age Archaeology: education, science and museum studies (Dosvid vprovadzhennia eksperymentalnykh doslidzhen v arkheolohii kamianoho viku: osvita, nauka ta muzeieznavstvo). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 66-77 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Bandrivskyi, M., Hnatiuk, R., Stepanchuk, V. 2018. Nove nyzhnopaleolitychne mistseznakhodzhennia Skhidnytsia II u pivnichno-skhidnii chastyni Beskydiv. Materialy i doslidzhennia z arkheolohii Prykarpattia i Volyni 22, s. 223–235. (in Ukrainian).
Hyria, E.Yu., 1997. Tekhnolohycheskyi analyz kamennykh industryi: metodyka mykro-makroanalyza drevnykh orudyi truda. Chast 2. Sankt-Peterburh. (in Russian).
Korobkova, H.F., Shchelynskyi, V.E., 1996. Metodyka mykro-makroanalyza drevnykh orudyi truda. Chast 1. Arkheolohycheskye yzyskanyia. Sankt-Peterburh. (in Russian).
Ryzhov, S.M., 2004. Kremiani vykhody Kanivskoho Prydniprovia. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, s. 112–119. (in Ukrainian).
Semenov, S.A., 1957. Pervobytnaia tekhnyka. Materyaly i issledovanyia po arkheolohyi SSSR. Lenynhrad. (in Russian).
Semenov, S.A., 1963. Razvitie tekhnyky v kamennom veke. Leninhrad: Nauka. (in Russian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Pohorilets, O.H., 2012. Medzhybizh: nyzhnopaleolitychna pamiatka na skhid vid Karpat. Arkheolhiia 4, s. 5–13. (in Ukrainian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Karmazynenko, S.P., 2013a. Davnia liudyna. Paleoheohrafiia ta arkheolohiia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian).
Stepanchuk, V.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Karmazynenko, S.P., Muan, A.-M., 2013b. Pervye itohy izuchenyia nizhnepaleoliticheskikh mestonakhozhdenyi Medzhybozha. Medzhybizh i problemy vyvchennia nyzhnoho paleolitu Skhidnoievropeiskoi rivnyny, s. 22–48. (in Russian).
Stepanchuk V.M., Vetrov V.S., Skorikov V.A. 2017. Doslidzhennia nyzhnoho paleolitu rivnynnoi Ukrainy, ohliad potochnykh danykh. Kamiana doba Ukrainy, vyp. 17—18, s. 48—65. (in Ukrainian).
Anderson, P.C. 1980. A testimony of prehistoric tasks: Diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges. World Archaeology 12, pp. 181–194. doi:10.1080/00438243.1980.9979791
Andrefsky Jr., W. 2008. Lithic technology, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Andrefsky, W. 2005. Macroscopic approaches to analysis. doi:10.2307/2694821
Andrefsky, W. 2008. Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499661
Ascher, R. 1961. Experimental Archeology. American Anthropologist 63, pp. 793–816. doi:10.1525/aa.1961.63.4.02a00070
Audouze, F., Bodu, P., Karlin, C., Julien, M., Pelegrin, J., Perlès, C. 2017. Leroi-Gourhan and the chaîne opératoire: a response to Delage. World Archaeology 49, pp. 718–723. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1416012
Balme, J., Paterson, A. 2006. Archaeology in practice: a student guide to archaeological analyses. Blackwell Pub.
Boëda, E., 2005. Paléo-technologie ou anthropologie des Techniques? Noûs 1, pp. 46–64.
Bril, B., Smaers, J., Steele, J., Rein, R., Nonaka, T., Dietrich, G., Biryukova, E., Hirata, S., Roux, V. 2012. Functional mastery of percussive technology in nut-cracking and stone-flaking actions: Experimental comparison and implications for the evolution of the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, pp. 59–74. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0147
Clarkson, C., O’Connor, S. 2013. An Introduction to Stone Artefact Analysis. In: Archaeology in Practice: A Student Guide to Archaeological Analyses. pp. 151–206. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.015
Coles, J.M. 1979. Experimental archaeology. London: Academic Press.
Cotterell, B., Kamminga, J. 1987. The Formation of Flakes. American Antiquity 52, pp. 675–708. doi:10.2307/281378
Coupaye, L. 2015. Chaîne opératoire, transeCts et théories : quelques réflexions et suggestions sur le parcours d’une méthode Classique. In: André Leroi-Gourhan, L’homme Tout Simplement: Mémoires et Postérité d’André Leroi-Gourhan. pp. 69–84.
Crabtree, D.E. 1982. An Introduction to the Technology of Stone Tools. Occasional Papers of the Idaho Museum of Natural History 28. Pocatello.
Delage, C. 2017. Once upon a time…the (hi)story of the concept of the chaîne opératoire in French prehistory. World Archaeology 49, pp. 158–173. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1300104
Dibble, H.L., Rezek, Z. 2009. Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force. Journal of Archaeological Science 36, pp. 1945–1954. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.004
Dibble, H.L., Whittaker, J.C. 1981. New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation. Journal of Archaeological Science 8, pp. 283–296. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(81)90004-2
Eren, M.I., Lycett, S.J., Patten, R.J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J.,  O’Brien, M.J. 2016. Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology.  Ethnoarchaeology. doi:10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
Flores, J.R., Paardekooper, R. 2014. Experiments Past. Histories of Experimental Archaeology. Sidestone Pres.
Foulds, F.W.F. 2013. Experimental Archaeology and Theory: Recent Approaches to Archaeological Hypotheses. doi:10.13140/2.1.4272.7203
Frick, J.A., Herkert, K. 2014. Lithic Technology and Logic of Technicity, Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte.
Stone, P.G., Planel, P.G. 2004. The Constructed Past Experimental archaeology, education and the public, First Edit. ed, One World Archaeology. Routledge.
Geribàs, N., Mosquera, M., Vergès, J.M. 2010. What novice knappers have to learn to become expert stone toolmakers. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, pp. 2857–2870. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.026
Goodale, N., Andrefsky, W. 2015. Lithic Technological Systems and Evolutionary Theory. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139207775
Goodyear, A.C. 1993. Tool Kit Entropy and Bipolar Reduction: A Study of Interassemblage Lithic Variability among Paleo-Indian Sites in the Northeastern United States. North American Archaeologist 14, pp. 1–23. doi:10.2190/HN4D-3MNN-5NRX-QPC8
Grace, R. 1972. Interpreting the Function of Stone Tools, 1–33.
Hecht, E.E., Gutman, D.A., Khreisheh, N., Taylor, S. V., Kilner, J., Faisal, A.A., Bradley, B.A., Chaminade, T., Stout, D. 2015. Acquisition of Paleolithic toolmaking abilities involves structural remodeling to inferior frontoparietal regions. Brain Structure and Function 220, pp. 2315–2331. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0789-6
Herrygers, C. 2002. A Comparative Analysis of Wood Residues on Experimental Stone Tools and Early Stone Age Artifacts: A Koobi Fora Case Study A Comparative Analysis of Wood Residues on Experimental Stone Tools. McNair Scholars Journal 6, pp. 65–75.
Holmes, W.H. 1894. Natural history of flaked stone implements. In: Wake, C. S. (Ed.), Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, Schulte, Chicago. pp. 120–139.
Hranicky, W.J. 2002. Experimental Archaeology. In: Lithic Technology in the Middle Potomac River Valley of Maryland and Virginia. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 252–271. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0615-7_11
Hughes, R.E., Ryzhov, S. 2018. Trace element characterization of obsidian from the Transcarpathian Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 19, pp. 618–624. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.03.030
Hurcombe, L. 2014. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. doi:10.4324/9780203827536
Inizan, M.-L., Roche, H., Tixier, J. 1992. Technology of knapped stone. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée 127.
Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., Tixier, J. 1999. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone, CREP, Nanterre.
Johnson, L. 1978. A history of flint-kinapping experimentation, 1838-1976. Current Anthropology 19, pp. 337–372.
Keeley, L.H. 1974. Technique and methodology in microwear studies: A critical review. World Archaeology 5, pp. 323–336. doi:10.1080/00438243.1974.9979577
Keeley, L.H. 1980. Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KimballKeeley, L.H., Toth, N. 1981. Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature 293, pp. 464–465. doi:10.1038/293464a0
Key, A., Dunmore, C.J., Hatala, K.G., Williams-Hatala, E.M. 2017. Flake morphology as a record of manual pressure during stone tool production. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 12, pp. 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.023
Key, A., Merritt, S.R., Kivell, T.L. 2018. Hand grip diversity and frequency during the use of Lower Palaeolithic stone cutting-tools. Journal of Human Evolution 125, pp. 137–158. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.006
Key, A.J.M., Lycett, S.J. 2011. Technology based evolution? A biometric test of the effects of handsize versus tool form on efficiency in an experimental cutting task. Journal of Archaeological Science 38, pp. 1663–1670. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.032
Kononenko, N., Torrence, R., White, P. 2015. Unexpected uses for obsidian: Experimental replication and use-wear/residue analyses of chopping tools. Technical Reports of the Australian Museum, Online 54, pp. 254–269. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.010
Korobkova, G.F. 2008. S.A. Semenov and new perspectives on the experimental-traceological method. In: British Archaeological Reports – International Series; 1783 / Proceedings of the International Congress, Verona (Italy), 20-23 April 2005. pp. 3–8.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1993. Gesture and Speech (October Books). The MIT Press.
Leroi-Gourhan, A.B.-A.M. 1964. Le Geste et la Parole, tome 1: Technique et Langage. Albin Michel.
Millson, D.C.E. 2011. Experimentation and interpretation: the use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past. Papers from a session held at the annual Theoretical Archaeology Group TAG Conference in Southampton England Dec 2008. Oxbow Books.
Moclán, A., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. 2018. An experimental study of the patterned nature of anthropogenic bone breakage and its impact on bone surface modification frequencies. Journal of Archaeological Science 96, pp. 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.007
Muller, A. 2017. The role of experimental knapping in empirically testing key themes in the evolution of lithic technology: reduction intensity, efficiency and behavioural complexity. School of Social Science.
Newcomer, M.H.H., Sieveking, G.D.G. 1980. Experimental Flake Scatter-Patterns: a New Interpretative Technique. Journal of Field Archaeology 7, pp. 345–352. doi:10.1179/009346980791505392
Nonaka, T., Bril, B., Rein, R. 2010. How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution 59, pp. 155–167.  doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006
Odell, G.H. 1996. Stone Tools. Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. doi: 10.1525/aa.1999.101.4.852
Odell, G.H. 2003. Lithic Analysis. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. doi:10.1080/2052546.2003.11949321
Odell, G.H. 2004. Tool Function. In: Lithic Analysis. pp. 135–245.
Outram, A.K., 2008. Introduction to experimental archaeology. World Archaeology 40, рр. 1–6. doi:10.1080/00438240801889456
Phillips, P. 1988. Traceology (microwear) studies in the USSR. World Archaeology 19, pp. 349–356. doi:10.1080/00438243.1988.9980045
Pitts, M., Keeley, L.H. 2006. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. Man 16, p. 480. doi:10.2307/2801305
Putt, S.S. 2015. The origins of stone tool reduction and the transition to knapping: An experimental approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2, pp. 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.01.004
Rosania, C.N., Boulanger, M.T., Biró, K.T., Ryzhov, S., Trnka, G., Glascock, M.D. 2008. Revisiting Carpathian obsidian. Antiquity 82, pp. 1986–1988.
Ryzhov, S. 2014. Obsidian outcrops in Ukrainian Transcarpathians and their use during the paleolitic time. Eraul 138, pp. 117–133.
Ryzhov, S. 2018. Archaeological and geological studies of obsidians in Ukrainian Transcarpathia. Archeometriai Műhely XV, pp. 225–230.
Ryzhov, S., Karmazinenko, S. 2015. Velykyj Sholes: Preliminary Results on a New Site of the Lower Palaeolithic in Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In: Yamada, M. and, Ryzhov, S. (Eds.), Archaeology and Geology of Ukraine in Regional Context. Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Meiji University, pp. 65–83.
Ryzhov, S., Stepanchuk, V., Sapozhnikov, I. 2005. Raw material provenance the Palaeolithic of Ukraine: state of problem. Current approaches and first results. Archeometriai Muhely 4, pp. 17–25.
Ryzhov, S.M., Karmazinenko, S., Bondar, K., Matviishyna, Z., Veklych, Y., Tymofeieva, Z. 2017. Preliminary results of geo-archaeological research in the new Lower Paleolithic site of Velykyj Sholes in Ukranian Transcarpathia. XІ International Scientific Conference “Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment” 11–14 October 2017, Kyiv, Ukraine. EAGE, pp. 168–173. doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201800092
Schiffer, M.B. 2013. Contributions of Experimental Archaeology. In: Experimental Laws and the Modern Era of Flint-knapping Experiments. pp. 43–52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00077-0_4
Schiffer, M.B., Skibo, J.M. 1987. Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28, pp. 595–622. doi:10.1086/203601
Semenov, S.A. 1964. Prehistoric technology an experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts fom traces of manufacture and wear. Adams and Dart, Bath.
Shea, J.J., Klenck, J.D. 1993. An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic microwear analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 20, pp. 175–194. doi:10.1006/jasc.1993.1013
Shinde, V. 2015. An experimental study of the technology of stone tool manufacture. Bulletin of deccan college post graguate and research indstitute, 47–48, pp. 311–320.
Shott, M.J. 2003. Chaîne Opératoire and Reduction Sequence. Lithic Technology 28, pp. 95–105. doi:10.1080/01977261.2003.11721005
Speth, J.D. 1972. Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking: Some Comments. American Antiquity 37, pp. 34–60. doi:10.2307/279229
Stemp, W.J., Watson, A.S., Evans, A.A. 2016. Surface analysis of stone and bone tools. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties 4, pp. 1-25. doi:10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/013001
Stepanchuk, V., Ryzhov, S., Rekovets, L., Matviishina, Z. 2010. The Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine: Current evidence. Quaternary International, 223–224, pp. 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2009.12.006
Stout, D., Hecht, E., Khreisheh, N., Bradley, B., Chaminade, T., Grafman, J. 2015. Cognitive Demands of Lower Paleolithic Toolmaking. PLoS ONE 10, pp. 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121804
Preliminary report on obsidian petrography from the Transcarpathian region in Ukraine. Natural Resource Environment and Humans, 4, pp. 21–37.
Swanson, E.H. 1975. Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools. Walter de Gruyter.
Toth, N. 1987. Behavioral inferences from Early Stone artifact assemblages: an experimental model. Journal of Human Evolution 16, pp. 763–787. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(87)90023-6
Venditti, F., Tirillò, J., Garcea, E.A. 2016. Identification and evaluation of post-depositional mechanical traces on quartz assemblages: An experimental investigation. Quaternary International 424, pp. 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.046
Venditti, F., Cristiani, E., Nunziante-Cesaro, S., Agam, A., Lemorini, C., Barkai, R. 2019. Animal residues found on tiny Lower Paleolithic tools reveal their use in butchery. Scientific Reports 9 (1), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49650-8
Whittaker, J.C. 1994. Flintknapping making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Words, K.E.Y., Audouze, F. 2002. Leroi-Gourhan, a philosopher of technique and evolution. Journal of Archaeological Research 10, pp. 277–306. doi:10.1023/A:1020599009172
Young, R.W. 2003. Evolution of the human hand: The role of throwing and clubbing. Journal of Anatomy, pp. 165–174. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00144.x

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]