Author: denis

VITA ANTIQUA Library                                                           ISBN 966-95597-1-5

One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture. Collection of scientific articles. K., 1999

(DE)

Das Erscheinen der Cernjachov-Bevölkerung am linken Dneperufer, 26-38

Andrej OBLOMSKIJ

 Das früheste Datum des Ankommens der Cernjachov-Bevölkerung ins Waldsteppengebiet des linken Dneperufers lässt sich nach zwei Fundkategorien, indirekten und direkten, bestimmen. Zu den erstgennanten gehören Fundkomplexe der Sejm-Kiever Variante der Kiever Kultur, in welchen die graue Drehscheibenkeramik und andere importierte Gegenstände aus dem Bereich der Cemjachov-Kultur. Die frühesten von ihnen sind Häuser des unteren Horizontes der Siedlung Boromlja-2, Häuser 1 und 2 der Siedlung Rodnoj Kraj-3, Haus 8 der Siedlung Bukreevka-2 und einige Funde aus der Siedlung Goöevo-3. In allen diesen Fundstellen wurden die Fibeln А. VII der von E. L. Gorochovskij ausgesonderten «südöstlichen Variante» entdeckt. In den Fundkomplexen kommen sie häufig mit Fragmenten von Amphoren des Typus D und F nach D. V. Selov (d.h. mit Amphoren von Typen Tanais und Inkerman) zusammen vor. Die Fibeln A.VII sind charakteristisch für die erste Phase der Cemjachov-Kultur nach E. L. Gorochovskij (230-270), obwohl einzelne Stücke noch bis zur Wende des 3./4. Jhs. fortlaufen. Die Amphoren des Typs D datieren vom Ende des 2. bis zur ersten Hälfte des 3. Jhs., aber sie können noch in der zweiten Hälfte des 3. Jhs. auftreten. Ins Gebiet des linken Dneperufers kommen sie, aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach, nicht später als um die Mitte des 3. Jhs, Dafür sprechen einige Komplexe mit den genannten Amphoren und denjenigen des Inkerman-Typus, deren grösste Verbreitung ins Ende des 3. Jhs. fällt. Alle oben erwähnten Fundstellen befinden sich im östlichen Teil des linken Dneperufergebietes und am Severskij Donjetz. Demnach erreicht der Einfluss der Cemjachov-Kultur diese Region in der zweiten Hälfte der ersten Phase nach E. L. Gorochovskij, d.h. um die Mitte und im dritten Viertel des 3. Jhs.

Die zweite Fundgruppe umfasst einige Gegenstände aus den Gräberfeldern der Cemjachov-Kultur. Die Leitfunde der ersten Phase in geschlossenen Grabkomplexen in den Cemjachov-Nekropolen sind bisher unbekannt. Die frühesten Funde stammen nur aus Siedlungen, u.z. eine Fibel А. VII, Fragmente von Amphoren von Typen D und F, ein Kupfertetrasarius von Tiras (238-253) aus Golovino-1, eine identische Fibel aus Novoselovka, Obi. Kursk ferner eine Fibel mit umgeschlagenem Fuss der Variante А 1 nach E. L. Gorochovskij aus Chochlovo-2 und Fragmente von Tanais- Amphoren aus Raduckovka und Pescany. Das früheste Datum der Fundstellen der Cemjachov-Kultur entspricht demnach der unteren chronologischen Grenze der Cemjachov-Importe aus dem östlichen Gebiet der Kiever Kultur. Die Bevölkerung der Cemjachov-Kultur erscheint am linken Dneperufer noch in der ersten Phase nach E. L. Gorochovskij und gleichzeitig verbreitet sich bis zum Severskij Donjetz-Gebiet, wo sich die Siedlungen Golovino-2 und Chochlovo-2 befinden.

Language: Russian

PDF

 Cite as:

Oblomskij, A. 1999. O vremeni poyavleniya chernyahovskogo naseleniya na territorii Dneprovskogo Levoberezh'ya (Das Erscheinen der Cernjachov-Bevölkerung am linken Dneperufer). In: Levada, M.E. (ed.). Sto let chernyahovskoy kulture (One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture). Collection of scientific articles. K.: VITA ANTIQUA Library, 26-38 (in Russian).

VITA ANTIQUA Library                                                           ISBN 966-95597-1-5

One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture. Collection of scientific articles. K., 1999

(DE)

Einige Bemerkungen über die Chronologie der Anfänge der Cernjachov-Kultur, 10-25

Mark Scukin

 In den letzten Jahren erschien eine Reihe von Studien, in denen versucht wurde, die Cernjachov-Kultur in mehrere Phasen zu gliedern und ihre früheste Entwicklungsetappe zu definieren (Бажан, Гей 1992; Гей 1993; Гей, Бажан 1997; Гороховский 1988; Шаров 1992; Щукин, Щербакова 1986). Dies vereinfacht die Aufgabe, die auch früher Forschungsgegenstand war (Щукин 1967; 1970; 1976; 1979). Bei allen Meinungesdifferenzen in Details, kamen die Forscher zum eindeutigen Schluss, dass die Herausbildung einer neuen Kultur im Schwarzmeergebiet in die Periode fällt, die im europäischen Chronologiesystem als Übergang von der Stufe Cla zur Clb bezeichnet wird. Es bleibt, das absolute Datum festzulegen. Es wurde in den letzten Jahren allgemein angenommen, dass dieser Übergang in den Jahren 230-240 erfolgte. Aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach, ist es eine korrekte Meinung, obwohl, ganz objektiv genommen, das Problem der absoluten Chronologie etwas komplizierter aussieht. Es geht darum, dass sich die absoluten Daten der relativen Chronologie relativ frei in den Rahmen, die absolut datierte Funde markieren, bewegen. Es kommt auch zu Gegensätzen, da sich die Phasen der relativen Chronologie, in den absoluten Daten ausgedrückt, oft überschneiden. Eine solche Erscheinung wurde von K. Godiowski in seiner letzten Studie im Jahre 1994 dargestellt. So müssen wir vom früher angenommenen, «quadratischen» System des chronologischen Denkens, zum «romboidalen» übergehen, welches das Überschneiden ermöglicht. Im gegebenem Fall benutzten wir dieselben Angaben, die K. Godiowski zum Definieren der absoluten Daten der Stufen B2/C1, Cla und Clb dienten, u.z. nur die Funde von terra sigillata mit Meisterstempeln.

Aus diesem Grund kommt man zu folgenden Schlüssen: die Stufe В 2 endet in den 70-er Jahren des 1. Jhs.; ihre grösste Entwicklung fällt in die Wende des 1./2. Jhs., der Anfang überschneidet sich mit der Stufe В lc in den Jahren 50-70. Der Anfang der Stufe В 2/C 1 liegt in den Jahren 140-150, ihre Blütezeit in 170-180, in der letzten Etappe der Markomannenkriege, das Ende an der Wende des 2./3. Jhs. Die Stufe Cla beginnt in den Jahren 150-160 und entwickelt sich parallel mit der Stufe B2/C1, erreicht den Höhepunkt um 200, als die vorangehende Stufe zu Ende neigt, und hört in den Jahren 220-230 auf, gleichzeitig mit der Blütezeit der Stufe Clb. Die Stufe Clb fängt in den Jahren 170-200 an, erreicht ihren Höhepunkt in den Jahren 220-240 und endet in den Jahren 240-260. Den Anfang der Stufe C2 muss man in die Jahre 230-250 einsetzen (aufgrund der terra sigillata aus Rheinzabern von Meistern Respectinus, Lupus Regilinus und Julianus). Ihre grösste Entwicklung fällt, nach den Münzen der gallischen Usurpatore, in die Jahre 260-270 oder noch später, bis zur constantinischen Periode zu Beginn des 4. Jhs.

Im Zusammenhang mit den genannten Daten, ist es möglich, dass sich der Zeitpunkt der Prozesse, die vor der Entstehung der Cernjachov- Kultur erfolgten, leicht ändert. So wäre der Übergang der Wielbark-Lubowidz-Stufe zur Cecele-Stufe, von R. Wolqgiewicz um 200 datiert, in die Jahre 170-180 einzusetzen möglich, ins Ende der Markomannenkriege also. Die Migrationswelle der Wielbark-Bevölkerung nach Osten (Brest- Triäin-Typ) mag demnach noch in die Jahre 160-200 zurückreichen. Das früheste Zeugnis der sog. Cernjachov-Kultur ist ihre charakteristische Drehscheibenkeramik. Die Analyse der Funde aus dem Gräberfeld in DanCeny und der Siedlung in Lepesovka lässt vermuten, dass die Herausbildung der Cernjachov-Kultur bereits in den ersten Jahrzehnten des 3. Jhs. erfolgte und in den Jahren 260-270 vollendete. Inwieweit diese archäologischen Daten mit den historischen Angaben übereinstimmen, wird das Thema einer anderen Studie. Trotzdem wird hier eine Vergleichstabelle angeführt (Abb. 4).

Language: Russian

PDF

Cite as:

Scukin, M. 1999. Nekotoryie zamechaniya k hronologii nachala chernyahovskoy kulturyi (Einige Bemerkungen über die Chronologie der Anfänge der Cernjachov-Kultur). In: Levada, M.E. (ed.). Sto let chernyahovskoy kulture (One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture). Collection of scientific articles. K.: VITA ANTIQUA Library, 10-25 (in Russian).

VITA ANTIQUA Library                                                           ISBN 966-95597-1-5

One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture. Collection of scientific articles. K., 1999

(DE)

Die Ausgrabungen von Vikentij Chvojka in Romaschki, 6-9

Natalia ABASCHINA

 Es wurde die Forschungsgeschichte des erstentdeckten Gräberfeldes der Cemjachov-Kultur in der Ukraine vorgerstellt. Die Fundstelle Romaschki wurde von V. Chvojka in den Jahren 1899 und 1901 ausgegraben. Zum erstenmal werden hier der Plan von Romaschki, Ujezd Vasilkov, Gouv. Kiev mit der Grabunsgstelle sowie die Grabpläne publiziert, die V. Chvojka im Jahre 1901 angefertift hatte.

Language: Russian

PDF

 Cite as:

Abaschina, N. 1999. Raskopki V.V. Hvoyki v Romashkah (Die Ausgrabungen von Vikentij Chvojka in Romaschki). In: Levada, M.E. (ed.). Sto let chernyahovskoy kulture (One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture). Collection of scientific articles. K.: VITA ANTIQUA Library, 6-9 (in Russian).

VITA ANTIQUA Library                                                           ISBN 966-95597-1-5

One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture. Collection of scientific articles. K., 1999

100 let chernyahovskoj kul'ture. Ot sostavitelya, 4-5

Oryol A.K., Levada M.E.

 Language: Russian

PDF

 Cite as:

Oryol, A., Levada M. 1999. 100 let chernyahovskoj kul'ture. Ot sostavitelya. In: Levada, M.E. (ed.). Sto let chernyahovskoy kulture (One hundred years of Chernyakhov culture). Collection of scientific articles. K.: VITA ANTIQUA Library, 4-5 (in Russian).

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019);                                                                      ISSN 2522-9419  (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects
The Department of Archaeology and Museology of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv at the beginning of XXI Century, 22-38

Terpylovskyi R.V.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-22-38
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-22-38
UDK: [902:069:378](477.411)”20”

ABSTRACT

The first Department of Archaeology in Ukraine was founded by corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR L.M. Slavin in 1944. During the 75 years of its existence, nearly one thousand staff members of the Institute of Archaeology of NASU, museums, universities and heritage protection institutions have been trained. Seven full-time teachers are working at the department (The head prof. R.V. Terpylovskyi, associate professors I.A. Kravchenko, S.M. Ryzhov, P.S. Shydlovskyi, Ye.V. Synytsia, K.O. Tretiak and PhD S.I. Ivanysko) and two support workers – L.G. Salata and M.V. Chymyrys. The Archaeological Museum of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv headed by L.G. Samoilenko, and the inter-departmental educational laboratory “Center for Underwater Archaeology, Archaeological and Ethnological Researches” headed by Ya.I Morozova work in close cooperation with the Department.

The department provides an adequate level of teaching of normative and special courses, and prepare bachelors of the Archaeology and Prehistory educational program and masters of the Archaeology educational program (specialty 032 “History and Archaeology”), and from 2018 – students of Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees of the new specialty 027 “Museum Studies, Monument Studies”. Archaeological and museum trainings allow students to consolidate theoretical knowledge. During 2004-2019, the geography of archaeological trainings was quite wide – from Transcarpathia to Middle Dnieper and Crimea.

The scientific achievements of the department, in particular, are related to the results of the study of archaeological sites, which belong to Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, Early Slavic and medieval times. Together with scientists from France, Germany and Switzerland, joint expeditions, archaeological material processing, mutual exchange of teachers, scientists and students were carried out, and scientific conferences were held. Scientific work has been embodied, in particular, in a series of publications, including the annual edition of VITA ANTIQUA, a number of monographs and textbooks. Now the Department is facing a number of complex issues, the solution of which will require our joint efforts.

Key words: Department of Archaeology and Museology, education, institution of higher education, archaeology, museology.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Terpylovskyi, P.S. 2019. The Department of Archaeology and Museology of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv at the beginning of XXI Century. VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies : educational and research aspects, p. 22-38.

References:
Abashyna, N.S., Kozak, D.N., Synytsia, Ye.V., Teprpylovskyi, R.V. 2012. Davni slov’iany. Arkheolohiia ta istoriia. Navch. posibnyk. K.: IA NAS of Ukraine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 364 s. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/ukr0000012538 .
Androshchuk, F.O. 1999. The Northmen and Slavs in the Desna River Area (The models of cultural interaction in the period of Early Middle Ages). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, TAA (Vita Antiqua Library), 143 p. (in Ukrainian). http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/949.
Videiko, M.Yu., Terpylovskyi, R.V., Petrashenko, V.O., 2005. Davni poselennia Ukrainy. K.: IA NAS of Ukraine, 190 s. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0000093 .
Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2016. Istoriia (Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History), 4 (131). K.: VPTs Kyivskyi universytet. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/host/10.23.10.100/db/ftp/visnyk/istoriya_131_2016.pdf .
Gladkikh, M.I. 1999. Drevnejshaya arkhitektura po arkheologicheskim istochnikam epohi paleolita, VITA ANTIQUA, 1, s. 29-33. http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/004VA01-gladkikh.pdf .
Gladkikh, M.I. (ed.). 2003. The Ukrainian Museum. The collection of scientific articles. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, TAA (Vita Antiqua Library), 221 p. (in Ukrainian). http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/685 .
Gladkikh, M.I., Morozova Y.I. (ed.). 2012. Ten Centuries of Byzantine Trade (the 5th – 15th centuries). Collection of scientific papers. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, TAA (Vita Antiqua Library), 216 p. http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/793#more-793 .
Gladkikh, M.I., Ryzhov, S.M. 2004. Ekolohichni chynnyky rozvytku pervisnoho suspilstva. Nauk. zapysky KNU, T. VI: Istorychnyi fakultet. s. 31-42.
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu». 2014. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady, 2014, №37-38. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 .
Zalizniak, L.L., Zubar, V.M., Terpylovskyi, R.V. ta in. 2005. Arkheolohiia Ukrainy. Kurs lektsii. Navch. posibnyk. K.: Lybid, 504 s. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0001708 .
Zelenko, S. 2001. Korablekrusheniya IX-XIII vv. v Sudakskoj bukhte. V: Morskaya torgovlya v Severnom Prichernomor`e. Kiev: Stilos, s. 83-92.
Zelenko, S. 2008. Podvodnaya arkheologiya Kryma. Kiev: Stilos.
Ivanysko, S.I. 2017. Etnichni protsesy za arkheolohichnymy dzherelamy (za materialamy z terytorii Ukrainy). Navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv spetsialnosti «Istoriia ta arkheolohiia». Kyiv, 90 s.
Orlova, T.V. (ed.). 2014. B. Honchar, I Zabolotna, Ya. Kalakura, Yu. Latysh, V. Mordvintsev, T. Orlova, S. Pavlenko, S. Pyvovar, V. Rubel, V. Rud, Ye. Synytsia, P. Shydlovskyi ta in. Istoriia v terminakh i poniattiakh: dovidnyk. Vyshhorod, 732 s. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2629639 .
Karsym, I.A. 2007. Naukovo-fondova robota muzeiv. Navchalnyi posibnyk. K.: AlIur, 92 s.
Karsym, I.A. 2007. Kulturno-osvitnia diialnist muzeiv. Navchalnyi posibnyk. K.: AlIur, 111 s.
Kolesnyk, V.F., Kotsur A.P., Teres, N.V. (ed.). 2005. Istoriia Kyiva: vid kniazhoi doby do suchasnosti. Zbirnyk dokumentiv i materialiv. Navchalnyi posibnyk. K.: Knyhy – XXI, 735 s.
Kravchenko, I.A. 2019. Osnovy muzeieznavstva. Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv zakladiv vyshchoi osvity. K.: Vydavets Oleh Filiuk, 287 s.
Kulatova, I.M., Suprunenko, O.B., Terpylovskyi, R.V. 2005. Piznoskifski ta piznozarubynetski starozhytnosti Poltavshchyny. Kyiv-Poltava, 100 s.
Mahortyh, S.V. 2005. Kimmerijtsi Severnogo Prichernomor’ya. Kiev: Shlyah, 380 s.
Postanova Kabinetu ministriv Ukrainy «Pro zatverdzhennia pereliku haluzei znan i spetsialnostei, za yakymy zdiisniuietsia pidhotovka zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity». 2015. K.: Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/266-2015-%D0%BF .
Pustovalov, S.Zh. 2005. Sotsialnyi lad katakombnoho suspilstva Pivnichnoho Prychornomor’ia. K.: Shliakh, 412 s.
Ryzhov, S.M. 2002. Metodychni porady do vyvchennia kursu Osnovy antropolohii dlia studentiv istorychnoho fakultetu. Kyiv: Stylos, 98 s.
Samoilenko, L.H. 2006. Muzei Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka: istoriia, dosvid roboty, perspektyvy rozvytku. Visnyk Odeskoho istoryko-kraieznavchoho muzeiu, 3, Lypen 2006. Odesa, s. 61-66. http://www.history.odessa.ua/publication3/stat11.htm .
Samoilenko, L.H. 2012. Sozdaniie kafedry arkheolohii i muzeievedenyia v Kievskom universitete. Arkheolohiia I davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 9. Istoriia arkheolohii: doslidnyky ta naukovi tsentry. K.: IA NANU, s. 228-234. http://www.vgosau.kiev.ua/load_period-sb/adiu_09.pdf .
Samoilenko, L.H. 2016. Education in Museum and Museum Education in the History of the University of Kyiv. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2016. Istoriia (Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History), 131 (4), p. 53-62. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/host/10.23.10.100/db/ftp/visnyk/istoriya_131_2016.pdf#page=53 .
Samoilenko, L.H., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2016. Mezhyrich Settlement: what will be the future of our past? Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2016. Istoriia (Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History), 131 (4), p. 62-69. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223 .
Sinitsa, E.V. 2009. Complex of Building 6 from Kaniv Settlement (excavations of 2006). VITA ANTIQUA, 7-8. Kyiv, 250-260 (in Ukrainian). http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/028VA09-synytsia-1.pdf .
Sinitsa, E.V., Terpylovsky, R.V. 2010. Archeological Research on the Territory of Kaniv Natural Reservation: history, achievements, perspectives. Arkheolohiia ta davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 1. Kyiv, s. 226-237 (in Ukrainian). http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.uaihome/images/pdf_doc/syn_16.pdf .
Stepanchuk, V.M., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Karmazynenko, S.P. 2013. Davnia liudyna. Paleoheohrafiia ta arkheolohiia. K.: Naukova dumka, 208 s.
Stepanchuk, V.M., Ryzhov, S.M., Pohorilets, O.H. 2012. Medzhybizh: nyzhnopaleolitychna pam’iatka na skhid vid Karpat. Arkheolohiia, 2012, №4, s. 5–13.
Terpylovskyi, R.V. 2004. Slavs in the Dnieper Region in the first half of the first millennium A.D. Monumenta studia Gothica III, Lublin UMCS, 220 p. http://www.archaeology.univ.kiev.ua/home/images/pdf_doc/terpylovsky_slav_2004.pdf .
Terpylovskyi, R.V. (ed.). 2006. Goty i Rim. Sbornik nauchnykh statei. K.: KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, TAA (Biblioteka Vita Antiqua), 256 s. http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/725#more-725 .
Terpylovskyi, R., Shydlovskyi, P. (eds.). 2017. VITA ANTIQUA, 9. Human & Landscape: Prehistoric Archaeology of Eastern Europe. Kyiv: Center for Paleoethological Research, 282 p. https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2017-9 .
Terpylovskyi, R., Shydlovskyi, P. (eds.). 2019. International Scientific Conference «Archaeology and Museology in Education and Research» on the occasion of 75th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology (October 24 – 25, 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine): Abstracts. – Kyiv: Vita Antiqua Library, 85 p. https://doi.org/10.37098/LVA-2019-902:069 .
Tretyak, K.O. 2004. The Lost Buildings and Monuments of Kyiv. Reference Book. Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet, 248 p.
Tretyak, K.O. 2018. Minlyve oblychchia mista, abo dolia kyivskykh fasadiv. K.: Parlamentske vydavnytstvo, 536 s.
Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2013. Doslidzhennia ta problemy zberezhennia Mezhyritskoho poselennia myslyvtsiv na mamontiv. Pratsi Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu pam’iatkookhoronnykh doslidzhen, 8. Kyiv: Feniks, s. 567-581. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1188708 .
Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2014. Aktualni pytannia antropolohii (materialy do vyvchennia navchalnoi dystsypliny «Istorychna antropolohiia»). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Lohos, 75 s. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2628863 .
Shydlovsky, P.S. (ed.). 2016. International Scientific Conference “Human & Landscape : Geographical approach in the Prehistoric Archaeology” (February 3 – 5, 2016, Kyiv, Ukraine) : Abstracts. Kyiv, Vita Antiqua Library, 94 p. http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/200#more-200.
Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2017. Pryroda i suspilstvo v rannomu holotseni Skhidnoi Yevropy : navch. posib. K.: VPTs «Kyivskyi universytet», 111 s. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2549561 .
Shydlovskyi, P.S., Lysenko, S.D., Kyrylenko, O.S., Sorokun, A.A., Pichkur, Ye.V. Prehistoric Archaeology of the Lower Desna Region. Kyiv: Vita Antiqua Library, 344 p. (in Ukrainian). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1190152 .
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Demay, L., Crépin, L., Tsvirkun, O., Chymyrys, M., Mamchur, B. 2020. Ponovlennia doslidzhen chetvertoho Mezhyritskoho zhytla, Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2018. Kyiv: Institute of Archaeology, NAS of Ukraine, s. 244-247. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3751600 .
Hughes, R.E., Ryzhov, S. 2018. Trace element characterization of obsidian from the Transcarpathian Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, March 2018, Vol. 19, p. 618–624.
Morozova, Y. 2012. New Approaches and Challenges of the Ukrainian Underwater Archaeological Heritage. In: Beyond Boundaries. The 3rd International Congress on Underwater Archaeology. Kollektion Vor und Fruhgeschichte, 17, Bonn, p. 41-46.
Morozova, Y., Oniz, H. (eds.). 2013. SOMA 2010: Proceedings of 14th Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiev, Ukraine, 23-25 April 2010. BAR International Series 2555.
Morozova, Y., Shydlovskyi, P. (eds.). 2017. Wetland Archaeology and Prehistoric Networks in Europe / NEENAWA International Scientific Conference, September 15th-18th, 2017. Kyiv–Kaniv: Vita Antiqua Library, 78 p. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1188274 .
Morozova, Y., Shydlovskyi, P. 2018. Step Ahead : NEENAWA 2017 International Scientific Conference report. VITA ANTIQUA, 10. Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe, p. 192-211. https://doi.org/10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10-192-207 .
Morozova, Y., Zelenko, S. 2008. Education and training programmes in underwater archaeology at National Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev. In: Collaboration, Communication and Involvement: Maritime Archaeology and Education in the 21st century. Torun: Wyzawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikolaja Kopernika, p. 149-156.
Nuzhnyi, D.Yu., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2015. Variabilité de l’industrie lithique entre les structures de l’habitation n°1 de Mezhyrich, site du Paléolithique supérieur d’Ukraine. L’Anthropologie, 119, №4 (Septembre-Octobre 2015). Hommes et environnements au Paléolithique supérior en Ukraine : Mezhyrich, 394-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2015.07.003 .
Ryzhov, S. 2014. Obsidian outcrops in Ukrainian Transcarpathians and their use during the Paleolithic time. Eraul, Vol. 138, p. 117–133.
Ryzhov, S. 2018. Archaeological and geological studies of obsidians in Ukrainian Transcarpathia. Archeometriai Műhely, Vol. XV, No. 3, p. 225–230.
Ryzhov, S., Karmazinenko, S. 2015. Velykyj Sholes : Preliminary Results on a New Site of the Lower Palaeolithic in Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In: Yamada, M., Ryzhov, S. (eds.). Archaeology and Geology of Ukraine in Regional Context. Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Meiji University, p. 65–83.
Ryzhov, S., Stepanchuk, V., Sapozhnikov, I. 2005. Raw material provenance the Palaeolithic of Ukraine: state of problem. Current approaches and first results. Archeometriai Muhely, Vol. 4, p. 17–25.
Shydlovskyi, P. (ed.). 2018. VITA ANTIQUA, 10. Prehistoric Networks in Southern and Eastern Europe. Kyiv: Center for Paleoethnological Research, 212 p. https://doi.org/10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10 .
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Crépin, L., Tsvirkun, O. 2018. Investigating a Prehistoric mammoth bone dwelling: from field and lab research to education. Quaternary Perspectives. 25(2), p. 18-19. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2631382 .
Shydlovskyi, P., Péan, S., Tsvirkun, O. 2019. Archaeological context of Mezhyrich Upper Palaeolithic settlement with mammoth bone dwelling structures. Quaternary Perspectives, 26(1), p. 11-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333534353_ .
Shydlovskyi, P., Tsvirkun, O., Péan, S. 2019. Spatial analysis of objects attributed to the Mezhyrichian Epigravettian Culture: a model of mobility. In: Beyond Paradigms: 25th EAA Annual Meeting (Bern, 2019). Abstract Book, p. 405-406. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335757141_ .
Stepanchuk, V., Ryzhov, S., Rekovets, L., Matviishina, Zh. 2010. The Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine: Current evidence. Quaternary International, Vol. 223–224. p. 131–142.
Stepanchuk, V.N., Sapozhnikov, I.V., Gladkikh, M.I., Ryzhov, S. 2009. Ukrainian Upper Palaeolithic between 40/10.000 BP : current insights into environmental-climatic change and cultural development. Le concept de territoires dans le Paléolithique supérieur européen. BAR International Series 1938, p. 63-74.
Suda, Y., Yamada, M., Ryzhov, S., Stepanchuk, V. 2014. Preliminary report on obsidian petrography from the Transcarpathian region in Ukraine. In: Yamada, M. (ed.). International joint research project, report 2013. Archaeological and Geological Researches in Ukraine. Tokyo: Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Meiji University, p. 11–17.
Yamada, M., Ryzhov, S. (ed.). 2015. Archaeology and Geology of Ukraine in Regional Context. Nagano: Center for Obsidian and Lithic Studies, Tokyo: Meiji University, Taras Schevchenko National University of Kyiv, 169 р.
Zelenko, S. 2017. The maritime trade in the medieval Black Sea. In: C. Buchet & M. Balard (eds.). The Sea in History – The Medieval World. Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer, p. 449-464.

 External review: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
International Conference on Topical Issues of Archaeology and Museum Studies (Kyiv, 2019), 213-220

Chymyrys Marharyta V.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-213-220
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-213-220

ABSTRACT

The new issue of the VITA ANTIQUA journal includes some of the materials that were presented in the reports at the International Scientific Conference «ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEUM STUDIES IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH», which took place on 24-25th of October, 2019 at the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv on the occasion of 75-th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology. The conference was attended by representatives of domestic and foreign educational and research institutions, museums, reserves and NGOs.

During the conference, a number of important and topical issues facing universities and research institutions (institutes, research centers, museums, libraries) were discussed. Emphasis was placed on the actualization of innovations in the field of activity of these institutions: in the supply of educational material, in approaches to training; in changes in museum concepts and forms, which will contribute to the modernization of these institutions. An important point is the involvement of a wide range of young professionals and graduates in the educational and scientific discussion, which demonstrates the positive trends of change.

Among the results of the conference, the most important are the decisions to deepen cooperation between museums and institutions of higher education in research and educational activities, to implement innovative practices in the archaeological, museum and monument protection spheres into the educational process, to develop a system of information exchange in the field of cultural heritage preservation at the national and international levels.

Key words: archaeology, museology, cultural heritage, international conference, institutions of higher education

Language: English/Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Chymyrys, M.V. 2019. International Conference on Topical Issues of Archaeology and Museum Studies (Kyiv, 2019). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 213-220 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Terpylovskyi, R.V., Shydlovskyi, P.S. (eds.). 2019. International Scientific Conference “ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEOLOGY IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH” on 75-th anniversary of the Department of Archaeology and Museology (October 24 - 25, 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine): Abstracts. - Kyiv: 2019. (Vita Antiqua Library). – 85 p. https://doi.org/10.37098/LVA-2019-902:069

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Reconstruction of Architectural Monuments as a Campaign for the Historical Justice in Ukraine (on the example of Kyiv), 205-211

Tretiak Kyrylo O.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-205-211
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-205-211
UDK: [351.853:72](477.411)

ABSTRACT

The article is about the importance of restoring of the lost buildings of Kyiv, which were as landmarks in the history of the city and entire country. The author substantiates the need to revive historic buildings for the cultural, economical, and political progress of the city. The author analyzes and characterizes the process of renewing of Kyiv monuments in the context of similar processes in Europe.

The issue of reconstruction of lost architectural heritage is very crucial for Kyiv. The main city architectural landmarks which represented and embodied Ukrainian identity as well as European traditions in the national culture were destroyed by the Russian Empire and the Bolsheviks during 19^th and 20^th centuries. Thus in 1811 the building of the City hall suffered from the fire and was destroyed although the project of its restoration was ready. In such a way Kyiv had lost an important evidence of the developed self-government with deep roots of Magdeburg law.

The ruined in 1930-1934th monuments such as Church of Pyrohoshcha, St. Michael’s Golden-Domed and Assumption Cathedrals in Lavra played an exceptional role in the history not only of Kyiv but also of the whole country. St. Michael’s and Assumption Cathedrals were unique examples of Ukrainian Baroque – a symbol of the flowering of Ukrainian culture and art of the 17-18th centuries. The reconstruction of St. Michael’s Golden-Domed Cathedral and its bell tower has improved the town-planning problem very much.

As a result of the tragic events in the twentieth century Kyiv has lost a large number of unique architectural, historical and cultural monuments. Each of the lost buildings witnessed a certain historical stage in the development of Kyiv and Ukraine as a whole. The situation was aggravated by the fact that the places of destroyed monuments remained empty or they were built up with new and alien to Ukrainian culture – architecture. That is why the restoration of the lost architectural monuments of Kyiv is such an important matter today.

Key words: architectural monument, historical and cultural heritage, historical buildings, reconstruction.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Tretiak, K.O. 2019. Reconstruction of Architectural Monuments as a Campaign for the Historical Justice in Ukraine (on the example of Kyiv) (Vidtvorennia arkhitekturnykh pamiatok yak borotba za istorychnu spravedlyvist Ukrainy (na prykladi Kyieva)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 205-211 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Asieiev, Yu. 1989. Bohorodytsia Pyrohoshcha. Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 1989, №2.
Kalnytskyi, M.B. 2012. Zruinovani sviatyni Kyieva: vtraty ta vidrodzhennia, K.: VD Dmytra Buraho, 224 s.
Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 1991, №5.
Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 1992, №2-3.
Plamenytska, O. 1999. Yan Zakhvatovych, slava i nedolia maistra, Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 1999, №1, s. 126.
Ryzka khartiia. Pro avtentychnist ta istorychnu rekonstruktsiiu kulturnoi spadshchyny. 2001. Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 2001, №4.
Rozporiadzhennia KMU «Pro zatverdzhennia pereliku obsiahiv ta etapiv vykonannia budivelnykh i remontnorestavratsiinykh robit na obiektakh Natsionalnoho universytetu «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia». 1995. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/731-95-р
Stovel, H. 2001. Pro Ryzku khartiiu. Pam’iatky Ukrainy, 2001, №4, s. 74.
Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy «Pro nevidkladni zakhody shchodo rozvytku mista Kyieva». 2008. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/157/2008
Tsapenko, M.P. 1967. Arkhitektura Levoberezhnoj Ukrainy XVII-XVIII vekov. M., 233 s.
Shevchenko, V. 1996. Reheneratsiia Kontraktovoi ploshchi na Podoli u Kyievi. Z istorii ukrainskoi restavratsii. K.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Protection and Museuming of Chinese Historical Objects, 200-204

Shuan Li, Peng Chan, Ivashko Julia V.
Kyiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-200-204
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-200-204
UDK: [069:351.853](510)

ABSTRACT

The article raises the problem of museuming objects of European heritage of North (German) National Romanticism in China. The example of the former Governor's residence, and later the China’s Government House of Guest, shows how the historic site has been transformed into a monument of national importance and at the same time a museum object. The specifics of the preservation of historical sites in Qingdao are characterized.

In Art Nouveau in China the international tendencies of European Art Nouveau interlaced with traditional Chinese architecture and gave the birth to the original Art Nouveau in China.

It is necessary to mark that the A.N. from one part of China to another differed so considerable. For example, the A.N. objects in German colony Qingdao differ from such objects at Russian settlement in Harbin, Shenyang and Dalyan. In Qingdao A.N. arose the original appearance in representative buildings – the original Chinese interpretation of North (German) National Romanticism. These objects are similar to the objects of National Romanticism in Northern Europe but they included the combination of European and Chinese traditions.

The most famous architects of German National Romanticism who worked in Qingdao were Lazarowicz Werner (the author of the Gouverneur House, built in 1907) and Curt Rothkegel (the author of the Christian Gospel church, built in 1908-1910). President Mao lived in the Governor's house in 1957, and since 1999 the building has been granted the status of a museum and monument of national importance, while fully preserving the authenticity of architecture and furniture.

Key words: preservation, museum, historical sites, Qingdao, governor's residence.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Shuan, L., Peng, Ch., Ivashko, Y.V. 2019. Protection and Museuming of Chinese Historical Objects (Zberezhennia i muzeiefikatsiia istorychnykh obiektiv v Kytai). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 200-204 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Levoshko S.S. 2000. Russkaya architektura I gradostroitelstwo v Severo-Vostochnoj Azii v XX vieke: vektory vzaimovlijanij. Rossija, Kitai, Japonia v Severo-Vostochnoj Azii: problem regionalnogo vzaimodeistvija v XXI veke. Мaterialy mezdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii 18–19 sentiabria 2000 g. Vladivostok. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://nature.web.ru/db/msg.html?mid=1185858
Levoshko, S.S. 2001. Russkaya architektura v kulturnom pogranichie Dalnego Vostoka. Manchzurija, 1900–1940-e gody. Vtoryje Kryshanovskiye chtenija: materialy mezdynarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Vladivostok: 2001. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://lib.rin.ru/doc/i/73319p.html
Linke, D. 2005. Tsingtau — Deutsche Stadt am Gelben Meer 1897–1914. Ein Kapitel deutscher Kolonialgeschichte in China. Kolme K Verlag: Auflage.
Sadowski, L. 2008. Architektura europejska w Chinach od połowy XIX wieku do 1937 roku. Sztuka Dalekiego Wschodu. Studia, Warszawa. S.145–154.
Sadowski, L. 2009. Architektura koncesji zachodnich w Szanghaju w latach 1860–1914. Sztuka Chin, Warszawa. S. 43–51.
Sadowski L. 2010. Architektura miast Kolei Południowo-Mandżurskiej w latach 1898–1945. Łódź (tekst w internecie).
Sadowski, L. 2011. The Japanes “overseas” architecture in North-East China 1905–1945. Art of Japan, Japanism and Polish-Japanese Art Relations, Kraków. S. 277–284.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Makau — ośrodek jezuickiej aktywności na Dalekim Wschodzie w latach 1565–1762. Architektura znaczeń, Warszawa. S. 102–113.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Zbiory Muzeum Wojskowego w Pekinie. Non Sensistis Gladios, Łódź. S. 335–348.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Harbin. The Center of Civilisation at the Northern Part of Manchzurija. Poland-China: Art and Cultural Heritage, Kraków. S. 171–183.
Sadowski, L. 2011. Zachodnie dzielnice w miastach Dalekiego Wschodu. Lublin, 2011.
Sadowski, L. 2013. Harbin. The Center of Civilisation at the Northern Part of Manczurija. Poland-China: Art and Cultural Heritage, Beijing (po chińsku). S. 156–164.
Sadowski, L. 2014. Polish Architects in China in the beginning of 20th Century. The Second International Conference of Polish and Chinese Art. China-Poland, Art and Cultural Heritage, Tainan. S. 131–142.
Warner, T. 1994. Deutsche Architektur in China. Architekturtransfer. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Quingdao. Quingdao: Quingdao Publishing House.
Yuan, Binjiu 2009. German architecture in Qingdao. Quingdao: China Architecture and Building Press.
Sun, Wei, Qing, Jun 2011. Qingdao German Governor’s House Museum (Qingdao Guest House). Quingdao: China book press.

External reviews: [DOWNLOAD – завантажити ПДФ]

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                        ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
The Modern Methodological and Scientific Concepts of Exhibition Planning on the Example of the Museums of a Historical Profile in China, 190-199

Markina Lisa A.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-190-199
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-190-199
UDK: 069.5(510)

ABSTRACT

The modern methodological and scientific concepts of exposition planning in the museums of а historical profile on the territory of China are a certain nationalist influence on the Society of China, which is built on the multicultural concept, which formulates globalizing, sociocultural, socio-pedagogical, and most importantly historical vision in the museum audience.

The modern methodological and scientific concepts an exhibition in the museums of а historical profile in China are a certain nationalist influence on Chinese society, built on a multicultural concept that formulates globalization, sociocultural, socio-pedagogical, and most importantly, historical audiences.

The notion of «museum exhibition», in Chinese, is called «博物馆的陈列品» («Bówùguǎn de chénliè pǐn») and has the meaning of a scientific combination of cultural relics, examples and auxiliary exhibits that reflect the processes of development and the laws of society, natural history, science and the technique or value of a particular subject, and the combination of science, art, and technology that can be observed by people.

The relevance of the article is the vision of historians, museum historians, and designers of modern tendencies, aimed at showing methodological and scientific basis, about planning of exposition on the example of а historical profile museums on the territory of China.

In the history of the Modern Chinese Museum of China, this problem is presented by scientific research – Zhou Shiki, Wang Yun, Zhang Len, Chen Duanyzhi, Lucy Pei, Gow Hujfen and others.

The aim is to highlight modern methodological and scientific concepts of exposition planning on the example of historical museums and to study innovative and innovative tendentions in the museums of historical profile in China.

Thus, the article presents an analysis of the study of modern methodological concepts of exposures planning in museums of а historical profile. Analyzing the development of research of methodological and scientific concepts, we show the relevance of these problems, among Chinese musealists, historians and designers. We can say that among the museums of а historical profile, there is a trend of nationalist, multicultural, socio-cultural, socio-pedagogical and historical vision. In addition, we can say that the data of methodological and scientific concepts combine the principle: «sence and forms»of the exposition and «vision of space» in the museum.

Key words: methodology, concepts, exposition, the museums of historical profile, China.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Markina, L.A. 2019. The Modern Methodological and Scientific Concepts of Exhibition Planning on the Example of the Museums of a Historical Profile in China (Suchasni metodolohichno-naukovi kontseptsii planuvannia ekspozytsii na prykladi muzeiv istorychnoho profiliu v Kytai). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 190-199 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Fùzhènlún. 1957. Bówùguǎn xué gàilùn. Běijîng: Shângwù yìn shűguǎn.
Wénhuà bù wénwù shìyè guǎnlǐ jú zhǔbiân. 1985. Zhôngguó bówùguǎn xué gàilùn. Běijîng: Wénwù chűbǎn shè.
Zhôushìqí. 2018. Kuà shíkông de lìshǐ wénhuà zàixiàn: Zhôngguó bówùguǎn chénliè yìshù 60 nián.
Lǐxuéqín, lǚwényù. 2006.20 Shìjì zhôngguó xuéshù dàdiǎn: Kǎogǔ xué, bówùguǎn xué.
Wánměi lùnwén wǎng. 2017. Bówùguǎn zhǎnpǐn chénliè zhǎnlǎn de shèjì qiǎn xî.
Wáng yún, dânwèi. 2016. Shânxî dàxué: Bówùguǎn chénliè zhǎnlǎn shèjì yìshù fçnxî.
Bówùguǎn chénliè zhǎnshì guì nèi shèjì yánjiű. 2015. Today China Forum (05): Nánjîng yìshù xuéyuàn xuébào (měishù yǔ shèjì).
Dài xiě shuòshì lùnwén. 2017. Bówùguǎn zhǎn chén shèjì de xíngshì yǔ kôngjiân bùjú yánjiű.
Haixin Jin, Shizhong Wu, Yijun Chen. 2015. Dângdài bówùguǎn chénliè shèjì de xùshì xìng yìshù tèzhçng.
Pân lì, shîguânghǎi. 2017. Zhìhuì wénbó: Gâoxiào bówùguǎnlǐlùn yǔ shíjiàn.
Mèngqìngjîn. 2011. Dàlián lǐgông dàxué: Xiàndài bówùguǎn gôngnéng yǎnbiàn yánjiű.
Bówùguǎn guǎn lǐ bànfǎ. 2015.
Laura Pozzi (University of Warsaw). Its Museum(s): Making the Shanghai History Museum / Shanghai Revolution Museum.
Hóng bó wǎng. 2019. Guânjiàn: Rúhé zài “yán” shàng zuò wénzhâng? Bówùguǎn yán xué rè xià de lěng sîkǎo.
Huìzhǎn huódòng cèhuà gôngsî dàxíng zhǎn shì shèjì chéngxù. 2018.
Wèilìshî. 2019. Chénliè bówùguǎn lùnwén. Shànghǎi zìrán bówùguǎn chénliè yìshù de yìngyòng.
Qúzhôu wǎnbào. 2019. Bówùguǎn chénliè shî: Ràng wénwù “dòng” qǐlái.
MuseumWeek. 2018. Bówùguǎn yǔ chéngshì: «Zhuânfǎng shànghǎi shì lìshǐ bówùguǎn guǎnzhǎng hú jiâng».

External reviews:  DOWNLOAD

VITA ANTIQUA, 11 (2019)                                                                       ISSN 2522-9419 (Online), 2519-4542 (Print)
Center for Paleoethnological Research

VITA ANTIQUA 11, 2019, Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects
Living Museums of Prehistoric times in Ukraine (statement of a question), 185-189

Chymyrys Marharyta V.¹, Olenych Andrii M.^2 
1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
² Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37098/VA-2019-11-185-189
https://doi.org/10.37098/VA-2019-11-185-189
УДК: 069.5(477)”632/634”

ABSTRAT

The task of any science is to disseminate scientific knowledge in society. Archeology aims to cover various aspects of the material culture of the past in various ways. In this direction, it interacts closely with museum and educational institutions (museums, schools, festivals), interacting with other applied sciences. The task of which is to maximize the spread of scientific knowledge in society. Here are very relevant forms of filing: various institutions (open-air museums, highly specialized museums), complexes (museum complexes), and exhibitions (temporary). The museum is a traditional and effective platform for these tasks.

However, in recent centuries, the requirements for the museum have changed significantly. Traditionally, it was considered as a place of storage, provided for the availability of funds, storage facilities, restoration offices, etc. Exposure work is only an important component here. The challenges facing contemporary museums give rise to their other forms, the so-called living museums. The first living museum (Skansen Museum) was created in Sweden in the late 19th century. In fact, this museum, which was focused on the presentation of samples of folk architecture and gave impetus to the emergence of such institutions.

In Ukraine, the term “museum-scansen”, “living museum”, “open-air museum” is widely used to refer to such museums. However, these concepts functionally denote the same variety of museums, or in general the widest possible range of museum museums. It should be noted that such museums can still be distributed on a number of grounds.

One such feature is the distribution of museums over the periods they present, and this raises the big question: “Are there any museums that are aimed only at Stone Age and is it even possible and rational?”

Key words: open-air museum, Living museum, scansen, Stone Age.

Language: Ukrainian

PDF

Cite as:
Olenych, A.M, Chymyrys, M.V. 2019. Living Museums of Prehistoric times in Ukraine (statement of a question) (Zhyvi muzei pervisnoi doby v Ukraini (postanovka pytannia)). VITA ANTIQUA 11. Archaeology, Museum & Monument Studies: educational and research aspects, p. 180-184 (in Ukrainian).

References:
Abramova, Z.A. 1971. Liasko — pamiatnik paleoliticheskogo naskal'nogo iskusstva. V: Vasilevskyi, R.S. (red.). Pervobytnoe iskusstvo. Novosibirsk, s. 53-80.
Bashkatov, Yu.Yu., Terpylovskyi, R.V. 2011. Do istorii skanseniv u Yevropi. Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 5, s. 7-16.
Borysenko, Yu.S. 2017. Stanovlennia ta rozvytok muzeinykh zakladiv prosto neba na ukrainskykh zemliakh (kinets XIX – 80-ti rr. XX st.). Pytannia kulturolohii, 33, s. 119-130.
Kozii, H. 2009. Pershomu v Ukraini Muzeiu prosto neba – 45. Kraieznavstvo, 1-2, s. 128-134.
Petrauskas, A.V., Petrauskene, A.O., Koval, O.A. 2013. Stvorennia muzeiu-skansenu «Drevlianskyi Hrad». Arkheolohiia i davnia istoriia Ukrainy, 10, s. 124-132.
Pronenko, I.V. 2017. Suchasnyi rozvytok muzeiv-skanseniv v ukrainskii muzeinii strukturi. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi ta vsesvitnoi istorii, 20, s. 91-97.
Remeshylo-Rybchynska, O.I. 2017. Arkhitekturno-prostorova orhanizatsiia arkheolohichnykh muzeiv pid vidkrytym nebom (na prykladi Plisneskoho istoryko-kulturnoho zapovidnyka). Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika» (Seriia: Arkhitektura) 878. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, s. 30-39.
Samoilenko, L.H., Shydlovskyi, P.S. 2016. Mezhyrich settlement: What will be future of our past? (Mezhyritska stoianka: yake maibutnie v nashoho mynuloho?). Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Istoriia. 4 (131), s. 62-69. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1206223
Tikhonov, V.V. 2013. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po formirovaniyu i razvytiyu etnograficheskikh muzeev. Irkutsk.
Fedorova, L.D. 2010. Natsionalnyi Muzei Narodnoi Arkhitektury Ta Pobutu Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy, 7, 728 s.: il. [online]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Natsionalnyj_m_arkh
Shmelev, V.G. 1983. Muzej pod otkry`ty`m nebom: Ocherki istorii vozniknoveniya i razvitiya. Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka.

Pirogovo. Muzej pod otkry`ty`m nebom. 2019. Istoriya sozdaniya muzeya Pirogovo [online]. Rezhim dostupu: http://pirogovo.org.ua/history.html
EXARC.net. 2019. EXARC Members Archaeological (Open-Air) Museums [online]. Режим доступу: https://exarc.net/members/venues

External reviews: ЗАВАНТАЖИТИ